Escobar
Shameless Musketeer
If he hd a right foot he could use it. Another big chance missed cause he can only shoot with left.
Just not good enough and I just dont see it with him
Just not good enough and I just dont see it with him
SouthamptonJust don't think he's anywhere near the level. As I asked in the matchday thread, who else in the league would take him as first choice?
Thank you for this—he really frustrated me today. He couldn’t finish his chances, struggled to hold onto the ball, and seemed to lose his balance at the slightest contact. He was second to every 50/50 ball, and his runs were so ineffective that they visibly annoyed his teammates. Both Martinez and Bruno were caught on camera giving him an earful, and I wouldn’t be surprised if others did the same off-camera, to be honest.
Yup, he's not getting passes because he's not putting himself in the right positions to receive themThat was my first thought when it happened.
This is how "no service" myth started. Guy makes a wrong move every time and players who make a pass take a blame for shit pass.
Edit: i just noticed that "snowflake obsessed". Whoever did that, nice job.![]()
Yeah my big thing with him is all top talents show flashes of potential, show the moments of class. He never really shows that much. He ranges from complete shit to decent at best, and I think that decent mid table level striker is where he'll top out at. He is still young and you never know, sometimes young players make big jumps. But he's a long way away.he simply looks basic to me. I've seen Aguero at 18 being great for Atletico and Tevez at 20 being equally ridiculous. Hojlund at 22 is nowhere near as talented and I can accept that.
but the question is, how much better he can actually get? for now let's ignore bad movement, underwhelming technique, being on the floor after every duel, average scoring stats and other stuff. let's just assume he will improve in all those areas by the time he's 24.
would you bet it will be worth the wait in the end? do we get new Ruud in 2 years? prime Dzeko at least? how much better do you see him at 24?
This is where I’m at. I don’t write him off for the future and am curious to see what he matures into, but for me, he needs a loan in a free-scoring league that hones his game and really makes him understand and appreciate his own game and strengths. Would love for him to spend a season in the Bundesliga, personally.We put in a very strong performance today, putting pressure on a great team, creating chances, and at times really controlling the game at Anfield. His teammates in attack played well, and it was a solid team effort, so we can't blame his team-mates for not creating anything for him. However, the fact that fans on here and platforms like Goal and MEN gave him the lowest ratings of all our players says a lot about his current form and qualities. He won't develop if we keep playing him in a league he isn't ready for.
It’s his biggest problem. He seems to make the wrong run most of the time and has a big problem shaking off defenders, almost running right into their arms instead.His movement is so frustrating.
Van Nistelrooy was playing for Heerenveen when he was Hojlund's age and didn't have a particularly amazing goalscoring record (around 1 in 3). That doesn't mean Hojlund is going to develop in the same way, but it's incredible to me that people are writing him off at 21. He's being asked to learn on the job in an incredbly difficult position in the toughest league for strikers in the world, and that's the fault of the club. Way too much is being asked of him right now. If he was at a serious club, they'd have a senior striker he could be rotated with and learn from. Maybe the freedom to go on loan to a pub league like the Eredivisie and bang in 20 goals to build his confidence. But that's not the case. Instead he seems bereft of it at the moment, to the point that he's doomscrolling social media and responding to negative comments.he simply looks basic to me. I've seen Aguero at 18 being great for Atletico and Tevez at 20 being equally ridiculous. Hojlund at 22 is nowhere near as talented and I can accept that.
but the question is, how much better he can actually get? for now let's ignore bad movement, underwhelming technique, being on the floor after every duel, average scoring stats and other stuff. let's just assume he will improve in all those areas by the time he's 24.
would you bet it will be worth the wait in the end? do we get new Ruud in 2 years? prime Dzeko at least? how much better do you see him at 24?
I just wanted to be fair, because in today's game he actually put himself in great positions a couple of times, creating passes, it's his overall set of skills combine with his urge to succeed what betrayed him.
Fair enough, just to be clear I'm mostly talking about this positioning within the box. He rarely seems to arrive at the right time to meet a cross or pass into the box.
This is where I’m at. I don’t write him off for the future and am curious to see what he matures into, but for me, he needs a loan in a free-scoring league that hones his game and really makes him understand and appreciate his own game and strengths. Would love for him to spend a season in the Bundesliga, personally.
He’s very clearly a weak link here and not ready for the demands and burden, and as you say, that’s just no way to develop, especially when you’re being scrutinised for every action and mistake. Mistakes are part and parcel of learning and he needs to be able to make them - a lot of - to develop. He won’t get that privilege afforded here.
It is, but usually - or better say in our storied past - it was about developing exceptional youngsters into world beaters or even all-time level talent. Our normal template is to take a Greenwood-level talent and nudge them on to world class for a career. In the here and now, Yoro is more akin to what our policy normally is, not Hojlund.It's not a question of League, it's more a question of that Price Tag over his head, the huge ammount of social media and press surrounding players nowadays and the team lacking playing as team what makes him so unstable.
This of coruse is in general.
Then it comes what he has as a footballer and he has to improve in such aspects, specially his hold up play and to be more dangerous from outside the area...of course Man Utd it's not a place for patience or developing, so he'll have to find his best self fast if the team from now on improves to gain his place.
Van Nistelrooy was playing for Heerenveen when he was Hojlund's age and didn't have a particularly amazing goalscoring record (around 1 in 3). That doesn't mean Hojlund is going to develop in the same way, but it's incredible to me that people are writing him off at 21. He's being asked to learn on the job in an incredbly difficult position in the toughest league for strikers in the world, and that's the fault of the club. Way too much is being asked of him right now. If he was at a serious club, they'd have a senior striker he could be rotated with and learn from. Maybe the freedom to go on loan to a pub league like the Eredivisie and bang in 20 goals to build his confidence. But that's not the case. Instead he seems bereft of it at the moment, to the point that he's doomscrolling social media and responding to negative comments.
He'll end up as another young player ruined by the clown show known as Manchester United if he doesn't get some help pronto.
It is, but usually - or better say in our storied past - it was about developing exceptional youngsters into world beaters or even all-time level talent. Our normal template is to take a Greenwood-level talent and nudge them on to world class for a career. In the here and now, Yoro is more akin to what our policy normally is, not Hojlund.
Suffice it to say what we're more known for is bringing in young players who have exceptional and easily identifiable aspects and attributes and then rounding out their game, so basically bringing other elements in line with what got them through the doors in the first place, as well as taking their initial selling point and making it elite in its own right.
Hojlund is a massive deviation from the template we're renowned for. In our true form, it is a player like a young Isak that would have come through the doors and be turned into the very best version of himself possible, not a Hojlund.
Whether you like what you see in Hojlund or not, there's no real consensus on the player he is or the player he might go on to be. There's a lot of hope based off not very much, but not much tangible elite ability, and that's a big departure from buying or promoting what would be classed as S tier talent.
A better way to say it might even be we're not used to developing players who are starting so far behind the starting line to becoming anything - usually, you have something really special about you for us to fork out eye-watering amounts of money. That policy has floundered a lot, the past few years, but it's still very foreign to the fanbase, which is why all the overpriced that have come through the doors of late have been getting a lot more stick: Antony, Mount, Hojlund, Zirkzee are a departure from: Pogba, Martial, Sancho, Amad and even Memphis Depay, so it's a question of what's coming through the doors in the first instance and where they're needing to be developed from rather than us not being familiar with putting the finishing touches to talent and making it something better than it was (historically).
Today his mates were better, but in other matches the crosses specially were pretty lame.
Anyway he is raw, he is extremely nervous to fit the bill and he is a kid.
He must do better, he could do better this game, yet when sometimes fans talk about things that actually didn't or did happen in a match and I feel it's not true, I ocassionaly give my view just to be fair for the player in question.
Yeah, no.In an ideal world we'd loan him to Leicester for the rest of the season.
Which league?Just don't think he's anywhere near the level. As I asked in the matchday thread, who else in the league would take him as first choice?
It is, but usually - or better say in our storied past - it was about developing exceptional youngsters into world beaters or even all-time level talent. Our normal template is to take a Greenwood-level talent and nudge them on to world class for a career. In the here and now, Yoro is more akin to what our policy normally is, not Hojlund.
Suffice it to say what we're more known for is bringing in young players who have exceptional and easily identifiable aspects and attributes and then rounding out their game, so basically bringing other elements in line with what got them through the doors in the first place, as well as taking their initial selling point and making it elite in its own right.
Hojlund is a massive deviation from the template we're renowned for. In our true form, it is a player like a young Isak that would have come through the doors and be turned into the very best version of himself possible, not a Hojlund.
Whether you like what you see in Hojlund or not, there's no real consensus on the player he is or the player he might go on to be. There's a lot of hope based off not very much, but not much tangible elite ability, and that's a big departure from buying or promoting what would be classed as S tier talent.
A better way to say it might even be we're not used to developing players who are starting so far behind the starting line to becoming anything - usually, you have something really special about you for us to fork out eye-watering amounts of money. That policy has floundered a lot, the past few years, but it's still very foreign to the fanbase, which is why all the overpriced that have come through the doors of late have been getting a lot more stick: Antony, Mount, Hojlund, Zirkzee are a departure from: Pogba, Martial, Sancho, Amad and even Memphis Depay, so it's a question of what's coming through the doors in the first instance and where they're needing to be developed from rather than us not being familiar with putting the finishing touches to talent and making it something better than it was (historically).