Sorry, that's absolutely not the case, and there's a whole transfer thread of proof that this signing carried a lot of uncertainty with it as well as a load of prescient posts about him not being ready to be the leading man at a club like ours, but as an understudy with potential for the future, the same posters were OK with him coming in.
Saying there was blanket excitement is a distortion of the reality that his thread prior to even getting here is riddled with. There was cautious optimism and obvious happiness that, apparently, we finally had recruiters we could trust - 'football men' - who could pick out supreme talent for the future. That's where euphoric leanings would come in; a blind hope that our new guys were so much better than the old ones that faith could be placed in their hands. You're always going to have a certain amount of delight at new signings/things coming in, but some carry a lot more doubt than others, even if that gets drowned out by the positivity of not seeing a player or recruitment team in action before cheerleading for them.
I'm not shitting on the player here, but there were so many posts warning against exactly what has materialised that it cannot be swept under the rug. Those posters voiced concern and were so spot on it makes those paid enormous sums of money to get our house in order look utterly inept. Those who are supposed to safeguard both the club and the player left him - and us - in the lurch by piling on responsibility and a role he was, evidently, nowhere near ready for. That a whole load of randoms on the internet could say they warned of exactly this beforehand is actually alarming because those that are supposed to be professionals should be light years ahead in assessment to the point they don't feck up and cost the club 10's of millions a pop, yet they've left us in the hole to the tune of well over half a billion pounds in godawful recruitment. That is objectively awful. Just awful. And it keeps happening - they keep making poor signings for the most part.
The stance with Hojlund rarely changes and most say he's raw and shouldn't have this kind of burden on him. Some want him sold, some want him to be understudy to a main man and others would be happy to see him loaned to round out and improve his game, but what we all know, even the majority who are behind him, is that he isn't ready to be the leading striker here and something needs to be done about that immediately.
There's been a rather massive swing of late because we're in a position precarious enough for relegation talk and threads to be pumped out with consistency. With that comes uptake in urgency for someone to come in and deliver "main man" performances that get us back to mid table mediocrity in the meantime and have us bemoan just being our usual level of bad and not this level where relegation talk has any legs whatsoever. If we're talking alarm bells, they're starting to rattle a bit now and people are getting antsy, frustrated and some are genuinely of the belief we could get relegated. You can see why, under such circumstances, watching a very raw and undercooked main man look questionable as a PL-level performer is going to amass posts of discontent.
It's really unprecedented in my lifetime that a United strikeforce can be compared directly to relegation fodder, and yet that's what we have right now. People are able to ask how the likes of Ipswich's main man are better than what we have. They have a #9 who looks better than our own. It can be fluffed up and talked around in many ways, but watching Liam Delap and then watching Hojlund, it is clear who is the superior PL-level talent at this precise moment in time. Without a hint of arrogance, questions have to be asked of how the winningest PL institution, who spend 100's of millions on players, is in a position where its strikeforce is in competition with relegation candidates for worst in the league. Hojlund, Zirkzee, Antony, Rashford and Garnacho have a sum total of goals between them that is alarming. Amad's position keeps getting dicked around with so it's debatable whether he should even be classed as a forward when so much has come from him dumped at wingback.
Anyway, I digress, and this post could continue to highlight our woes and legitimate concerns, but even with well meaning hope for the future Hojlund, there's simply no grounds to state what he's putting forth is adequate, whether the team is flailing as a unit or not. As an individual, a PL striker of any merit does a lot more. Liam Delap isn't even the benchmark of expectation for a PL striker that the likes of us would be eyeing up for the future, and yet there's no doubt there's a chasm between he and Hojlund right now, or are you saying we're even bereft compared to Ipswich? Cunha is another, who whilst not a striker, you see performance level in that you immediately understand has value to it, enough to interest top clubs in the division. If we offered a swap of our #9 for Delap or Cunha, do you think they'd take it? If Hojlund was in the predicament of either player, would he outdo them? This, and a plethora of other really obvious, and painfully clear questions can be asked that wouldn't come out favourably for our young Dane. We're in a SOS state for good reason.