HTG
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2011
- Messages
- 7,042
- Supports
- Bayern
14m Compensation for 6months
Great business for Rangnick.
14m Compensation for 6months
14m Compensation for 6months
These numbers don't really add up in my head. We were paying Rangnick 7 million a year for him to work as a part time consultant. Most managers in the PL don't get paid as much. Also, its not like he was a toxic presence like Jose in his last days. What was the harm in keeping him on than paying him 14 million for doing nothing? We could've kept him as a consultant and ignored his advice.
Our financial dealings are idiotic but this seems beyond belief.
He absolutely was.These numbers don't really add up in my head. We were paying Rangnick 7 million a year for him to work as a part time consultant. Most managers in the PL don't get paid as much. Also, its not like he was a toxic presence like Jose in his last days. What was the harm in keeping him on than paying him 14 million for doing nothing? We could've kept him as a consultant and ignored his advice.
Our financial dealings are idiotic but this seems beyond belief.
Incredible incompetence. Ralf will be laughing to the bank.Great business for Rangnick.
United could have used his talent for a DOF position and earn money in the same effective manner.Great business for Rangnick.
These numbers don't really add up in my head. We were paying Rangnick 7 million a year for him to work as a part time consultant. Most managers in the PL don't get paid as much. Also, its not like he was a toxic presence like Jose in his last days. What was the harm in keeping him on than paying him 14 million for doing nothing? We could've kept him as a consultant and ignored his advice.
Our financial dealings are idiotic but this seems beyond belief.
The club realised it would have been too expensive to bring in the wholesale changes that Ralf recommended and that they’ll need to get rid of too many players because he deemed it easier to just cut them off instead of rehabilitating them back to form.These numbers don't really add up in my head. We were paying Rangnick 7 million a year for him to work as a part time consultant. Most managers in the PL don't get paid as much. Also, its not like he was a toxic presence like Jose in his last days. What was the harm in keeping him on than paying him 14 million for doing nothing? We could've kept him as a consultant and ignored his advice.
Our financial dealings are idiotic but this seems beyond belief.
The club realised it would have been too expensive to bring in the wholesale changes that Ralf recommended and that they’ll need to get rid of too many players because he deemed it easier to just cut them off instead of rehabilitating them back to form.
As usual, the club realised a few months too late that the wholesale changes were needed anyway and proceeded to overspend in making late transfers rather than doing the early business.
Also, Ralf isn’t the kind of guy to build relationships and he’s more of a cut throat guy that needs people to do things his way or it’s out for them. Too many burnt bridges from his interim period, he probably recommended to sell the entire first team for downing tools.
That’s just the PR talk by the club. He was fine with a DOF at Ajax, no real reason to reject one when the rest of our setup is incompetent and filled with people doing on the job trainings.When ETH joined, i think it was reported that he didn't want Ralf upstairs. It's all one big clusterfeck.
I still wonder why we cancelled the second deal. He would have been a good voice to have for sureIncredible incompetence. Ralf will be laughing to the bank.
Because he had an existing job with some Russian club and we had to at least match that amount for him to break it and join us.Again, why would his salary be 7 million? Wasn't he supposed to work only 3-4 days a month?
These numbers don't really add up in my head. We were paying Rangnick 7 million a year for him to work as a part time consultant. Most managers in the PL don't get paid as much. Also, its not like he was a toxic presence like Jose in his last days. What was the harm in keeping him on than paying him 14 million for doing nothing? We could've kept him as a consultant and ignored his advice.
Our financial dealings are idiotic but this seems beyond belief.
Great at making money off dysfunctional football clubs though.One of the shittest managers ever
These numbers don't really add up in my head. We were paying Rangnick 7 million a year for him to work as a part time consultant. Most managers in the PL don't get paid as much. Also, its not like he was a toxic presence like Jose in his last days. What was the harm in keeping him on than paying him 14 million for doing nothing? We could've kept him as a consultant and ignored his advice.
Our financial dealings are idiotic but this seems beyond belief.
Because Rangnick and his disastrous spell at your club is just a small part of a greater issue you guys have. And in order to improve as a club, to get past all this dysfunctional nonsense, you need to form some sort of understanding about the greater and underlying issues. Simply moving on and hoping for the best might not be the best solution.I dont know why there is this constant focus on Rangnick still. Anyone by now will have to acknowledge his time with us with a catastrophic failure.
Yes he didnt get the backing from the board and the players clearly didnt buy in to his plans, full well knowing he would only be interim. But he also completely failed to implement anything and our team managed to look worse than under Ole.
Thankfully we now have Erik Ten Hag and things are already looking much better. I honestly dont care what happens to Rangnick in the future and I have also changed my stance on him as a consultant. Ten Hag didnt want him and with how much better we look under him, I am happy the board seems to listen to him.
Rangnick will go down as a complete disaster and rightfully so. I had high hopes for him but was proven wrong.
Because Rangnick and his disastrous spell at your club is just a small part of a greater issue you guys have. And in order to improve as a club, to get past all this dysfunctional nonsense, you need to form some sort of understanding about the greater and underlying issues. Simply moving on and hoping for the best might not be the best solution.
That’s just the PR talk by the club. He was fine with a DOF at Ajax, no real reason to reject one when the rest of our setup is incompetent and filled with people doing on the job trainings.
That’s just the PR talk by the club. He was fine with a DOF at Ajax, no real reason to reject one when the rest of our setup is incompetent and filled with people doing on the job trainings.
That's true. But generally speaking, it should be in your interest to learn as much as possible about all these disastrous spells of all those failed coaches/managers.But a comment everytime Rangnicks new team under- or overperforms doesnt really add anything to that understanding. Its simply noise about a failed manager.
Most likely the report hasn’t got the figures right. United always overpay, I think Ole ended up about £9m a year, but it does seem disproportionate for a part time job even by our standards.Again, why would his salary be 7 million? Wasn't he supposed to work only 3-4 days a month?
And I'm sure he is fine working with the current DOF Murtagh but that doesn't necessarily mean he wanted to work with Rangnick.
The rumour is the club wanted Ralf to advise on recruitment, and in their first conversation allegedly it became clear to Erik pretty quickly that Ralf was advising the club to steer completely clear of Eredivisie players which obviously wouldn't have worked for ETH.
These numbers don't really add up in my head. We were paying Rangnick 7 million a year for him to work as a part time consultant. Most managers in the PL don't get paid as much. Also, its not like he was a toxic presence like Jose in his last days. What was the harm in keeping him on than paying him 14 million for doing nothing? We could've kept him as a consultant and ignored his advice.
Our financial dealings are idiotic but this seems beyond belief.
France haven't been playing well for a while, and Croatia and Denmark aren't powerhouses.they have been playing well for the most parts but against much better opponents.
He got his contract extended after the EL Final loss, which also gave him a bump in salary too.Ole on 9M per year?
I thought he's a cheap yes man?
France haven't been playing well for a while, and Croatia and Denmark aren't powerhouses.
There aren't really worse teams in the Nations League Group A.
That's true. But generally speaking, it should be in your interest to learn as much as possible about all these disastrous spells of all those failed coaches/managers.
You are joking right? France and Croatia are WC finalists from 2018 and Denmark are semi finalists from the last EC.France haven't been playing well for a while, and Croatia and Denmark aren't powerhouses.
There aren't really worse teams in the Nations League Group A.
France haven't been playing well for a while, and Croatia and Denmark aren't powerhouses.
There aren't really worse teams in the Nations League Group A.
Not sure where you got that from. I said the teams in Group A are not particularly worse than those. They are all decent teams.So you think Austria is the same level as Croatia and Denmark????
Rangnick would lose week in week out and then spend his press conferences basically telling the world our players had herpes and they were all wankers. He was very toxic.These numbers don't really add up in my head. We were paying Rangnick 7 million a year for him to work as a part time consultant. Most managers in the PL don't get paid as much. Also, its not like he was a toxic presence like Jose in his last days. What was the harm in keeping him on than paying him 14 million for doing nothing? We could've kept him as a consultant and ignored his advice.
Our financial dealings are idiotic but this seems beyond belief.
Before anyone says I am an RR fan boy, I am not, I value his ability upstairs in a club in terms of organizing structure, scouting & recruitment etc but I would like to point out Austria in the past 5 games have played Denmark and France twice and Croatia, all 3 of those teams are definitely better and Austria would expect to lose but they managed to draw against France - Not quite sure what people were expectingWondered why this thread went quiet.