I mean, Sterling, for all his lack of end product, will win this debate if we go by stats -- quite comfortably. But, I've seen Chamberlain play against big sides, in big games, and he's been immensely impressive. Sterling has never really impressed me in the same way. He's a great talent, I wouldn't deny that for a second, and still young -- and in fact, due to the Ox's injury problems, will more than likely have the better career. But if I had to watch one playing at their best, it would be Chamberlain. Just from a technical point of few. His close control is better imo, he can dribble his way out of areas you wouldn't expect him to. It's a personal choice, and really just a hunch, but I do think Chamberlain is naturally the more talented of the two. So miles may be stretching it, but yeah, I think Chamberlain has the potential to be better.