Rafael da Silva | 2010-14 Performances

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yep. For a while there seems to be this attitude that if a player doesnt move up to a bigger club, they lack ambition. Or that if a bigger club just waves money around the lesser club will just fold and sell. An attitude I've never really been a fan of. Dont think fans of top clubs realise how condescending it can be. If they do, they probably don't care.

Seeing a similar thing with Southampton and their players. Hope you lot can keep the team together and build something.

Agreed!

Too often do we hear that players need to progress to the bigger clubs if they want to improve their career or status as footballers. Think of what Southampton would look like if they weren't forced to sell their players once they become good - Bale, Walcott and now Shaw - a left side of Shaw-Bale wouldn't be shabby.

A lot of players improve as they join a bigger club as the training facilities are better, as are often the players they train and play with. However, it would be interesting to see how Premier League would look like if players remained more loyal to their clubs they grew up with. In Norway, Rosenborg more or less ruined Norwegian football as they bought everyone who looked like a proper prospect, thus robbing the lesser clubs of real talent and the talents withered on the bench.

Think only of a club like Villa if players like Young, Milner, Dawson, Barry, had stayed at the club and were content with being very good for a small club instead of becoming average for a big club(ish).
 
The claims that Varela is ready to step up and immediately cover for Rafael are hilarious. All the more so coming from people who probably have barely watched him kick a ball. Against journey-men and kids in the U-21 league

Best of all is moany nick from london trying to have a go at moyes for the fact varela hasn't played for the first team already. Classic.
 
The claims that Varela is ready to step up and immediately cover for Rafael are hilarious. All the more so coming from people who probably have barely watched him kick a ball. Against journey-men and kids in the U-21 league

Best of all is moany nick from london trying to have a go at moyes for the fact varela hasn't played for the first team already. Classic.

I'd like to see him get a shot, to be honest. Right now, what have we got to lose by playing him there? Playing Smalling there is doing nothing for his very own football or confidence at the moment. Plus, I like the little I've seen of Varela. He appears to be tidy on the ball and generally quite efficient. Again, why not?
 
Because he's not ready?

He hasn't even been at the club for the whole season so far. He had to go back home around christmas when his parents were in a car crash.

We've had dozens of tidy, efficient young fullbacks at the club over years, playing reserve and underage football. Only one or two were good enough for the first team and they were head and shoulders better than their peers. Far too soon to know if Varela really is ready to step up. Whatever your opinion on moyes he's brought through and/or signed some decent fullbacks and united has a great team of coaches working with our u-21s. If Varela is ready, he'll get a shot. Meanwhile, people are just finding yet another way to have a moan.
 
Last edited:
So that means, in a season which is over, of which there is just over 10 games left, we shouldn't give our reserve right back a shot there just see if he may or may not actually be ready?

There is nothing to lose. Well, there is, we can continue to shred Smalling's confidence. If Varela isn't good enough then that's fine, but if we're talking about a simple possibility of yes or no then there's no reason at all we can't throw him a game and gain some perspective for the transfer window ahead.
 
Didn't Varela go back to his home country because of a family berevement? Making this whole discussing a bit of a moot point, as he's not even in the country anymore?
 
Didn't Varela go back to his home country because of a family berevement? Making this whole discussing a bit of a moot point, as he's not even in the country anymore?

He's been back in the fold for a few weeks or so now.
 
Because he's not ready?

He hasn't even been at the club for the whole season so far. He had to go back home around christmas when his parents were in a car crash.

We've had dozens of tidy, efficient young fullbacks at the club over years, playing reserve and underage football. Only one or two were good enough for the first team and they were head and shoulders better than their peers. Far too soon to know if Varela really is ready to step up. Whatever your opinion on moyes he's brought through and/or signed some decent fullbacks and united has a great team of coaches working with our u-21s. If Varela is ready, he'll get a shot. Meanwhile, people are just finding yet another way to have a moan.

Not having a dig; do you watch a lot of U21 matches? Didn't Janko actually keep Varela out of the first team for a while? He certainly has physique on his side...

Is Varela good enough to be back up for Rafael? I don't think many people argue that he should be Rafael's replacement.
 
Not having a dig; do you watch a lot he's U21 matches? Didn't Janko actually keep Varela out of the first team for a while? He certainly has physique on his side...

Is Varela good enough to be back up for Rafael? I don't think many people argue that he should be Rafael's replacement.
No jankos pretty much played all his under 21 football as a right midfielder. When hes been fit and available varelas been first choice right back
 
Agreed!

Too often do we hear that players need to progress to the bigger clubs if they want to improve their career or status as footballers. Think of what Southampton would look like if they weren't forced to sell their players once they become good - Bale, Walcott and now Shaw - a left side of Shaw-Bale wouldn't be shabby.

A lot of players improve as they join a bigger club as the training facilities are better, as are often the players they train and play with. However, it would be interesting to see how Premier League would look like if players remained more loyal to their clubs they grew up with. In Norway, Rosenborg more or less ruined Norwegian football as they bought everyone who looked like a proper prospect, thus robbing the lesser clubs of real talent and the talents withered on the bench.

Think only of a club like Villa if players like Young, Milner, Dawson, Barry, had stayed at the club and were content with being very good for a small club instead of becoming average for a big club(ish).
yeah thats exactly what i mean. good to know you feel similarly rossa :) It just doesnt make sense to me that in the UK fans will talk about the EPL as the most competitive league in the world but then implicitly want their club to weaken the competition by buying up some of the players from lesser clubs. How exactly does that maintain the level of competitiveness which is so often branded about.
 
The claims that Varela is ready to step up and immediately cover for Rafael are hilarious. All the more so coming from people who probably have barely watched him kick a ball. Against journey-men and kids in the U-21 league

Best of all is moany nick from london trying to have a go at moyes for the fact varela hasn't played for the first team already. Classic.
Playing Varela in a defense which is absolutely shattered off confidence would be one of the most stupid thing to do imo. These guys can't look after themselves, the last thing you'd want is a young kid thrown into the shit. I'd maybe give him a few minutes here and there but we've not really been in a position where we could do that in most of our games.
As for Rafael, I hope to god we don't get rid of him. His injury concerns are frustrating but he's still young and should be given time.
 
For all the talk of him revamping our scouting department, would be a bit underwhelming if he tried to nab one of his former players again.
Well not really as Coleman has been one of the best right bands backs this season. I'd hate it if he was a replacement for Rafael though.
 
yeah thats exactly what i mean. good to know you feel similarly rossa :) It just doesnt make sense to me that in the UK fans will talk about the EPL as the most competitive league in the world but then implicitly want their club to weaken the competition by buying up some of the players from lesser clubs. How exactly does that maintain the level of competitiveness which is so often branded about.

There's definitely a question of competitiveness in the EPL. There's a huge gap between the best six or seven teams and the rest. However, unlike the Bundesliga and La Liga, the lesser teams seem to have the ability to compete with the top teams from time to time. Especially in the cups the lesser teams seem to compete quite well. In the Bundesliga, Bayern are notorious for buying the top talents and the lesser clubs struggle at keeping their best players - even a top club like Dortmund struggles at that. In La Liga, only Barca and Real Madrid seem capable of holding onto their top players. In the EPL, there seems to be at least four or five teams capable of that - City, Chelsea, United, Liverpool and aguably Arsenal. Tottenham and Everton might be contenders for that as well.

So yes, I agree that the EPL isn't as competitive as people make out. There is an elite of four or five teams; no other teams seem capable of winning the title for the forseeable future. Whenever an upcoming team like Southampton does well, they don't really stand a chance of keeping their talents that brought them thus far. What often happens is that if you get into the radar of the top teams, you get robbed of players and thus struggle a lot the following season(s).
 
Then why not replace him with Coleman?

Because Coleman must still prove more to show that he's of a higher quality than Rafael. Last year's Rafael was at least as good as this year's Coleman. People must stop confusing class with form. Also, Coleman would be an expensive buy. Furthermore, Moyes must stop looking at his former club for talent. They are an average club - United need more than that. Playing well for an average club, where teams play with a different tactic than against teams like United.
 
Because Coleman must still prove more to show that he's of a higher quality than Rafael. Last year's Rafael was at least as good as this year's Coleman. People must stop confusing class with form. Also, Coleman would be an expensive buy. Furthermore, Moyes must stop looking at his former club for talent. They are an average club - United need more than that. Playing well for an average club, where teams play with a different tactic than against teams like United.

I'm not sure where to start here.... Firstly, you believe Coleman is currently inferior to Rafael? Also, I'm not confusing talent with form in the slightest, Coleman is very talented, not just hitting a purple patch that he'll fail to re-match after this. Furthermore, how do you measure an average club out of interest? And even if ignore your silly statement as your stuck in the past mate, people don't come to OT and change their game anymore, I appreciate we want to get back to the fulcrum of the elites, but to say we shouldn't go for a player "because he plays for an average team" is blind.
 
First of all - I didn't say Coleman was inferior; I said he has yet to prove that he is of a higher calibre than Rafael. People, like you, dismiss our own players far too easily after one poor season. Last year, Rafael was superb; imo, he was at least as good as what I've seen from Coleman this season. I know Coleman is talented, but so is Rafael. Replacing Rafael with Coleman is to me like replacing DDG with Courtois - some may argue that it is a slight upgrade based on this season, but I doubt the quality is much better, at least not to the extent that it is where the money is best spent.

I measure an average club as one who usually sits between tenth and fifth place - European league is within reach, but it's a level up to CL. Do you define it differently? Again, United may not qualify, will not qualify, for the CL this season, but the club is still a bigger club and of higher quality than Everton, for instance - we will bounce back, just like Rafael will bounce back as the talent is there for all to see.

I didn't say we shouldn't go for a player from an average team; however, players from average teams rarely improve the top teams instantly. There are many players from average teams who were great in their average teams who failed to deliver for the top teams as it is quite a step up.

Coleman is quality, but so is Rafael; it is not the position we need to strengthen at all. We need back up for him, and Coleman is too good to be back up. It would instead be interesting to see if Varela or Janko could step up.
 
I'm not sure where to start here.... Firstly, you believe Coleman is currently inferior to Rafael? Also, I'm not confusing talent with form in the slightest, Coleman is very talented, not just hitting a purple patch that he'll fail to re-match after this. Furthermore, how do you measure an average club out of interest? And even if ignore your silly statement as your stuck in the past mate, people don't come to OT and change their game anymore, I appreciate we want to get back to the fulcrum of the elites, but to say we shouldn't go for a player "because he plays for an average team" is blind.
Rossa is making a good point though. The jump from a team like Everton to Man United is huge. Doesnt seem like it now because we are in a poor position but it's a different level in terms of expectation,pressure and demands. Fellaini is a good player but will be a United class sort of player at United? He did really well for Everton but has yet shown the same kind of form here. This is the risk you take when you players from average teams. They will either sink or swim. People see a player do well for a lesser club and assume that same form will translate over to when they arrive to the big club. However, this isn't always the case and it's certainly possible that said player underwhelms.

At the top it's more cutthroat. That's why Lukaku is on loan. Because he still needs to learn how to be a striker at a top club. Fans will look at his goal count and say it was ridiculous for Mourinho to let him go on loan. But Lukaku at this moment in time doesnt really get involved in the build-up, is a bit rash in his decision-making, low average of aerial duels won for a player his size and is inconsistent with his hold-up play. These are things which are quickly shown up at a bigger club that is easier to get away with a lesser one. THat's why at West Brom he was simply a battering ram and it worked for him but that wont necessarily work at Chelsea when the demands are higher.
 
Well not really as Coleman has been one of the best right bands backs this season. I'd hate it if he was a replacement for Rafael though.
He's doing really well but it'd still be underwhelming to me because of the fact that Moyes is going back to his old club instead of looking elsewhere. Let them be dave.
 
I agree with Rossa. Given the amount of work that needs to be done with this squad, I just dont think a new right back is a priority. A couple of midfielders, a new centre half and a left back would be the priority, Id rather we concentrated our efforts on those positions, filled them with real quality, and not spread ourselves too thinly. Obviously we lack cover for Rafael and there is a very strong case to be made for getting someone in as cover but I would rather look at someone cheaper who can do a job there, rather than looking for a new first-team-level RB. As much as people talk about getting 5 or 6 top quality players in, that just isnt going to happen, and if we are going to get 3 or 4 (and even that is a bit optimistic IMO) such players, I dont think one of them should be a right back. Everyone has dips in form but we should trust Rafael to come back a better player, the player he was last year. I am sure he will.
 
There's definitely a question of competitiveness in the EPL. There's a huge gap between the best six or seven teams and the rest. However, unlike the Bundesliga and La Liga, the lesser teams seem to have the ability to compete with the top teams from time to time. Especially in the cups the lesser teams seem to compete quite well. In the Bundesliga, Bayern are notorious for buying the top talents and the lesser clubs struggle at keeping their best players - even a top club like Dortmund struggles at that. In La Liga, only Barca and Real Madrid seem capable of holding onto their top players. In the EPL, there seems to be at least four or five teams capable of that - City, Chelsea, United, Liverpool and aguably Arsenal. Tottenham and Everton might be contenders for that as well.

So yes, I agree that the EPL isn't as competitive as people make out. There is an elite of four or five teams; no other teams seem capable of winning the title for the forseeable future. Whenever an upcoming team like Southampton does well, they don't really stand a chance of keeping their talents that brought them thus far. What often happens is that if you get into the radar of the top teams, you get robbed of players and thus struggle a lot the following season(s).
I would say in the bundesliga, the lower teams do have ability to compete with the top teams. But Bayern is just at a completely different level right now who can compete with them? haha. Dortmund is still retooling but they have had some poor results at the hand of lower teams. I'd say Bundesliga is quite competitive but less so at the top.

If you have time this piece by Honigstein I think gives some insight on that http://www.theguardian.com/football...liga-moose-jens-keller-sami-hyypia?CMP=twt_gu
 
I agree with Rossa. Given the amount of work that needs to be done with this squad, I just dont think a new right back is a priority. A couple of midfielders, a new centre half and a left back would be the priority, Id rather we concentrated our efforts on those positions, filled them with real quality, and not spread ourselves too thinly. Obviously we lack cover for Rafael and there is a very strong case to be made for getting someone in as cover but I would rather look at someone cheaper who can do a job there, rather than looking for a new first-team-level RB. As much as people talk about getting 5 or 6 top quality players in, that just isnt going to happen, and if we are going to get 3 or 4 (and even that is a bit optimistic IMO) such players, I dont think one of them should be a right back. Everyone has dips in form but we should trust Rafael to come back a better player, the player he was last year. I am sure he will.
Agreeed and I dont want 5 or 6 players coming in one window. That's too much change imo. Because there you have the issue of integrating these players into the team and the puzzle doesnt always just come together as quickly as you had hoped.
 
First of all - I didn't say Coleman was inferior; I said he has yet to prove that he is of a higher calibre than Rafael. People, like you, dismiss our own players far too easily after one poor season. Last year, Rafael was superb; imo, he was at least as good as what I've seen from Coleman this season. I know Coleman is talented, but so is Rafael. Replacing Rafael with Coleman is to me like replacing DDG with Courtois - some may argue that it is a slight upgrade based on this season, but I doubt the quality is much better, at least not to the extent that it is where the money is best spent.

Show me where I mentioned anything bad in regards to Rafael, that's a lack of reading on your part. Also, as for "I didn't say Coleman was inferior", nor did I claim you to, so I'm not sure why your bringing that up, I asked IF you thought he was, not WHY, very different. FWIW, I rate both players quite similarly, both very good young RB's, neither world class level yet consistently, which is fine considering their age, however Rafael does get injured a lot.
I didn't say we shouldn't go for a player from an average team; however, players from average teams rarely improve the top teams instantly. There are many players from average teams who were great in their average teams who failed to deliver for the top teams as it is quite a step up. Coleman is quality, but so is Rafael; it is not the position we need to strengthen at all. We need back up for him, and Coleman is too good to be back up. It would instead be interesting to see if Varela or Janko could step up.
I'm not sure why you are again claiming you didn't do something you did, when you say "I didn't say we shouldn't go for a player from an average team", what is this?
They are an average club - United need more than that.
... I've not claimed you've said anything you haven't, it seems to be me who has been misquoted by you. However, stupidness aside, I'd hate to see us go for Coleman, but not because he's from Everton was my bottom point, which I think is what you meant anyway.
Rossa is making a good point though. The jump from a team like Everton to Man United is huge. Doesnt seem like it now because we are in a poor position but it's a different level in terms of expectation,pressure and demands. Fellaini is a good player but will be a United class sort of player at United? He did really well for Everton but has yet shown the same kind of form here. This is the risk you take when you players from average teams. They will either sink or swim. People see a player do well for a lesser club and assume that same form will translate over to when they arrive to the big club. However, this isn't always the case and it's certainly possible that said player underwhelms.At the top it's more cutthroat. That's why Lukaku is on loan. Because he still needs to learn how to be a striker at a top club. Fans will look at his goal count and say it was ridiculous for Mourinho to let him go on loan. But Lukaku at this moment in time doesnt really get involved in the build-up, is a bit rash in his decision-making, low average of aerial duels won for a player his size and is inconsistent with his hold-up play. These are things which are quickly shown up at a bigger club that is easier to get away with a lesser one. THat's why at West Brom he was simply a battering ram and it worked for him but that wont necessarily work at Chelsea when the demands are higher.

It is a big jump up, yes. However saying
They are an average club - United need more than that
, is quite different from saying that it's a big step, so he doesn't really have a point in that. In respect of your comments on Lukaku, fully understood but it's moot, I don't mean to be rude, but Lukaku before last season hadn't even played in the EPL, and a striker is a completely different position and requirements, COleman has had over 100 first team appearances already, there's a slight bit of difference despite the ages between PL experience. You overall point in that it's a big jump up to the first, I'd have to obviously agree with, but I'm not sure why it's worth mentioning as for every lower club signing (that a larger club makes) that fails, I can easily show you one that works... So I don't buy into personally, if your good enough, you'll catch up. But the point was, being "good enough" isn't defined by the level of club you play for currently.[/quote][/quote]
 
He's doing really well but it'd still be underwhelming to me because of the fact that Moyes is going back to his old club instead of looking elsewhere. Let them be dave.

That's some seriously flawed point of view though. If Everton have players that are good enough then I doubt we'd worry too much about the fact that he plays at Everton. There would be questions as to whether they'd sell him to us, but that's about it.
 
It is a big jump up, yes. However saying , is quite different from saying that it's a big step, so he doesn't really have a point in that. In respect of your comments on Lukaku, fully understood but it's moot, I don't mean to be rude, but Lukaku before last season hadn't even played in the EPL, and a striker is a completely different position and requirements, COleman has had over 100 first team appearances already, there's a slight bit of difference despite the ages between PL experience. You overall point in that it's a big jump up to the first, I'd have to obviously agree with, but I'm not sure why it's worth mentioning as for every lower club signing (that a larger club makes) that fails, I can easily show you one that works... So I don't buy into personally, if your good enough, you'll catch up. But the point was, being "good enough" isn't defined by the level of club you play for currently

I know that players from lower teams can make the jump up but what I was highlighting was the risk in just plucking these players from lesser clubs and expecting them to deliver right away. That's why i made the point about the expectation of fans thinking a player's form will directly translate from a lesser club to a top one when sometimes it just doesnt work out like that.

In terms of what rossa said, i'd have to look back through the posts to try and see where you two precisely arent seeing eye to eye but what I gleaned from what Rossa said is that bringing Coleman in from Everton may not be so great because he's coming from an average club where the demands, expectations and pressure is much less than here.
 
That's some seriously flawed point of view though. If Everton have players that are good enough then I doubt we'd worry too much about the fact that he plays at Everton. There would be questions as to whether they'd sell him to us, but that's about it.
meh it probably is flawed. it's just a point of principle for me. In this scenario I just feel it's unnecessary and some sort of fallback option more than "We need this player!!!"
 
I think there is something slightly more to it than that. He has literally the whole world to choose from, going back to his former club for a second time (third if you include the unsuccessful raid for Baines) smacks of not casting his net broadly enough. Perception does matter.
 
@Adebesi yeah that's part of what i'm getting at. Everton have good players but there's got to be other players out there just as good
 
Show me where I mentioned anything bad in regards to Rafael, that's a lack of reading on your part. Also, as for "I didn't say Coleman was inferior", nor did I claim you to, so I'm not sure why your bringing that up, I asked IF you thought he was, not WHY, very different. FWIW, I rate both players quite similarly, both very good young RB's, neither world class level yet consistently, which is fine considering their age, however Rafael does get injured a lot.

I'm not sure why you are again claiming you didn't do something you did, when you say "I didn't say we shouldn't go for a player from an average team", what is this? ... I've not claimed you've said anything you haven't, it seems to be me who has been misquoted by you. However, stupidness aside, I'd hate to see us go for Coleman, but not because he's from Everton was my bottom point, which I think is what you meant anyway.

Whenever people start discussing semantics, I'm lost for words in a forum like this. My argument was that there is no guarantee that a player who comes from an average club like Everton will take the step up to a club like United; therefore, as I see Rafael as certainly not inferior to Coleman, I see little point in going for Coleman. Does that clarify the whole "average club" part for you? Don't replace our own younger players of equal or greater talent to older players at lesser clubs that we cannot know for certain will deliver at a greater club - do you disagree with that?

It's a pointless discussion though as you also said that you didn't want us to go for Coleman, although you did ask someone else why we shouldn't...
 
I would say in the bundesliga, the lower teams do have ability to compete with the top teams. But Bayern is just at a completely different level right now who can compete with them? haha. Dortmund is still retooling but they have had some poor results at the hand of lower teams. I'd say Bundesliga is quite competitive but less so at the top.

If you have time this piece by Honigstein I think gives some insight on that http://www.theguardian.com/football...liga-moose-jens-keller-sami-hyypia?CMP=twt_gu

I'll look into that piece tomorrow I think.

You are probably much more knowledgeable about German football than I am, as I hardly watch it. Therefore, I'll take your word for it. When I do watch the Bundesliga, however, I'm amazed at how entertaining it is to watch. From being a very cynical footballing nation, Germany has really turned on the charm, footballing wise at least ;)

Agree with your and Abdebsi's post about not finding players just at Everton. When Meulensteen picked players from the United academy, it was all very understandable as he knew the players and knew their potential. Managing a club like Fulham, picking players from a top team is seen as progressive. For a manager who comes from an average club to only continue fixating on players from his former club is a little worrisome. I therefore hope the rumors are false, and that Moyes has his eyes on other players in positions we need strengthening.
 
Agree with your and Abdebsi's post about not finding players just at Everton. When Meulensteen picked players from the United academy, it was all very understandable as he knew the players and knew their potential. Managing a club like Fulham, picking players from a top team is seen as progressive. For a manager who comes from an average club to only continue fixating on players from his former club is a little worrisome. I therefore hope the rumors are false, and that Moyes has his eyes on other players in positions we need strengthening.
That is awful logic though as both Cole and Tunnicliffe were reserve players who have instantly been shipped out when the new manager came in. From Everton we've been linked with Baines, the best LB in the league and we were linked with him under Fergie too and now Coleman arguably up there as best right back in the league. Picking a player from a top team who has never made a first team appearance isn't progressive at all. Picking up the best player in the league in a certain position is progressive.
 
That is awful logic though as both Cole and Tunnicliffe were reserve players who have instantly been shipped out when the new manager came in. From Everton we've been linked with Baines, the best LB in the league and we were linked with him under Fergie too and now Coleman arguably up there as best right back in the league. Picking a player from a top team who has never made a first team appearance isn't progressive at all. Picking up the best player in the league in a certain position is progressive.
Correct.
 
That is awful logic though as both Cole and Tunnicliffe were reserve players who have instantly been shipped out when the new manager came in. From Everton we've been linked with Baines, the best LB in the league and we were linked with him under Fergie too and now Coleman arguably up there as best right back in the league. Picking a player from a top team who has never made a first team appearance isn't progressive at all. Picking up the best player in the league in a certain position is progressive.

Baines has arguably been the best fullback - personally I think he would be too slow for United and that would be telling. Coleman has been very good this season, but Rafael was better last season. Playing well for an average club does not always equal playing well for a better club. Keane was great for Tottenham for a spell but absolutely rubbish for Liverpool - the pressure. Fellaini was arguably the best CM alongside Carrick last season. He has hardly looked that this season.

Picking young talents from the top clubs who hasn't made it into the first eleven can be a good move if you know the players and their talents, especially if you think long term. Meulensteen wasn't awarded a long term project exactly.
 
Baines has arguably been the best fullback - personally I think he would be too slow for United and that would be telling. Coleman has been very good this season, but Rafael was better last season. Playing well for an average club does not always equal playing well for a better club. Keane was great for Tottenham for a spell but absolutely rubbish for Liverpool - the pressure. Fellaini was arguably the best CM alongside Carrick last season. He has hardly looked that this season.

Picking young talents from the top clubs who hasn't made it into the first eleven can be a good move if you know the players and their talents, especially if you think long term. Meulensteen wasn't awarded a long term project exactly.
Maybe they aren't the perfect signings and we shouldn't sign them but it isn't because they are at Everton. Playing well for an average club can also mean playing even better at a bigger club. Playing well at a big club also doesn't mean playing well at an average club. It works all ways. Fellaini has been hampered with injuries and being used in a different position and style so you can't really use him as an example yet.

It can be a good move but it can also be a bad move. Just like picking up the best players from a lower side. All of your points can equally be said the opposite way. There are some players who don't make the step-up to a bigger club but there are those that do. Just as you say if you know the player and their talents the club they are currently playing for should mean practically nothing. A manager tries to envisage what that player will be like in their set-up not at what club they play for. A large percentage of top players started off at average clubs and moved to bigger clubs.
 
That is awful logic though as both Cole and Tunnicliffe were reserve players who have instantly been shipped out when the new manager came in. From Everton we've been linked with Baines, the best LB in the league and we were linked with him under Fergie too and now Coleman arguably up there as best right back in the league. Picking a player from a top team who has never made a first team appearance isn't progressive at all. Picking up the best player in the league in a certain position is progressive.
Is coleman the best rb in the league outright or are you using your opinion of him to suit what you're trying to say?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.