Radamel Falcao | Ducker: Medical passed!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Might be his flight,
Falcaoplane.png

shit its going to hit Dymchurch!!!!
 
Could not believe this when I saw it this morning. Turned on SSN expecting to hear about a few players leaving and the first thing I saw was them discussing a £65 million move. Obviously we now know it's a loan, but still unbelievable. Still not quite sure what to make of it all. The muppet in me(it's in everyone, don't lie!) is obviously excited at the prospect of one of the worlds top strikers at the club.... not that we lack them anyway.Still my head obviously wonders where he'll play and what it means for the team. I guess Van Gaal has some plan if he okay'd it. Certainly sends a message that we aren't fecking about, especially since this comes after Di Maria.
 
£5-6m for the year + his wages. feck it. Thats a good deal! We are getting Falcao :drool:. Still can't believe it.
 
Few on here would have seen his career progression as you mate. Do you think he'll be back to his flying best?
I think that's a question of fitness. If he's fully fit I'm pretty sure he'll be immense. He's a player that relies more on wits and finishing technique than pure physique so I'm pretty sure he has room for some great years if he can stay free of injury.
 
We are definitely expanding our market in South America with this summer's signings and we could yet get Cuardado next summer.

A right sided winger would be a godsend IMO.

Still, as far as I know South America isn't a huge market in the sense that places like the US, the far East or to a lesser extent (due to population) Scandinavia are. Simply because they have decent teams to support back home for the most part. No one's gonna ditch a club like Boca Juniors for a European team. Which is why we never go to South America on pre-season tours.

Read some article about this recently and to me it sounds like it makes sense.
 
feck the defense. Our plan is to outscore our opponents. If that means the score line is 7-6.
 
Muppet dream until a year ago, not sure what to think now with the lack of scoring opportunities we create for the strikers.
 
No club in the world has three strikers of that calibre because it's nonsensical to leave a world class player on the bench. The closest thing to it is Barcelona but all three of their "strikers" can play out wide. Having three central strikers of that class is like having three centre backs of that class - all three can only play one position so inevitably one will be on the bench at all times. It's a colossal waste of money and a potential dressing room disaster.



:confused:

Do you really believe that? Neither Chelsea or City have any world class players on the bench. Perhaps Jovetic if he kicks into gear but then if that happens he'll likely relegate Dzeko/Negredo - players who are clearly nowhere near being world class - to the bench and we're back to square one.

Exactly. Plus, all three of them are similar except that Falcao is quicker and stronger than Rooney and van Persie. In terms of play style, they're almost identical. None of them will add a different dimension if things aren't working out. Welbeck is the only one who can do this, and he may leave the club...

Plus, with Falcao, we have yet another short-term solution whilst losing out on the long term with Welbeck looking likely to leave. Wilson himself won't be enough to replace Rooney, Falcao, and van Persie in 2-3 years.
 
he is on citation 9H-ALL due in Manchester at 17:05
Where and how do I look that up mate?

I think that's a question of fitness. If he's fully fit I'm pretty sure he'll be immense. He's a player that relies more on wits and finishing technique than pure physique so I'm pretty sure he has room for some great years if he can stay free of injury.
Thanks for your opinion!
 
Shaw, Herrera, Blind, Rojo, DI MARIA AND FALCAO. We will never experience such a muppet dream in our lifetime. :(

Unless Woodward wants to turn us into the Real Madrid of England. :lol:
 
Irrespective of age, all those players you mention would walk into the first XI of "lesser" clubs and cost a fortune to sign. Well and good assuming that they're happy sitting on their heels in case, one day, their time will come but they will also be acutely aware of players who wasted years sitting on the bench at those clubs and never got that first XI slot they're holding out for. Don't think it's any more difficult to manage young egos than it is to manage those of players who are a bit longer in the tooth. The opposite if anything.

I'm sure we are aiming to have a squad as balanced as City and Chelsea's. Be foolish not to. Of course, Mourinho/Pellegrini didn't create those squads in a single transfer window, so what makes you think that Van Gaal should be able to do what they couldn't?

My only point was that no-one has a world class player on the bench despite all the rhetoric by managers/directors of football at the top clubs. It just doesn't happen. Turns out you can maybe argue that's true of Bayern/Gotze but then he can play in any of 6 positions - and that's something he did last year to get the necessary game time. I don't think anyone would argue any of the others are "world class" by any definition and that includes those at City.

For the most part the reason they have expensive benches is mainly because of the players' age, potential and long-term contribution to the squad. They're brought in as squad players with the potential to challenge for the first team. City are different, they buy the likes of Navas, Negredo and Fernando - squad players capable of becoming first team players, but none of them would have expected to walk straight into the team. That's different to what's going on here. We've just bought another world class player, in his prime, to either stick on the bench or bench one of the few world class players we have in the squad.

Basically, the Falcao/Rooney/van Persie issue is something unique to our club and I personally think it's an absurd signing. I don't think it's a van Gaal signing and don't expect him to work miracles at all. The club has brought in some very good players which will bolster the squad considerably and I'm more than happy with how things have went on the whole. I just think this particular signing is the wrong one.
 
My only point was that no-one has a world class player on the bench despite all the rhetoric by managers/directors of football at the top clubs. It just doesn't happen. Turns out you can maybe argue that's true of Bayern/Gotze but then he can play in any of 6 positions - and that's something he did last year to get the necessary game time. I don't think anyone would argue any of the others are "world class" by any definition and that includes those at City.

For the most part the reason they have expensive benches is mainly because of the players' age, potential and long-term contribution to the squad. They're brought in as squad players with the potential to challenge for the first team. That's not really the case here. We just bought another world class player, in his prime, to either stick on the bench or bench one of the few world class players we have in the squad.

Basically, the Falcao/Rooney/van Persie issue is something unique to our club and I personally think it's an absurd signing. I don't think it's a van Gaal signing and don't expect him to work miracles at all. The club has brought in some very good players which will bolster the squad considerably and I'm more than happy with how things have went on the whole. I just think this particular signing is the wrong one.
it's possible he thinks RvP is no longer in the 'world-class' bracket though, and he is 31 now, and supposedly requires surgery too. Hardly outlandish, is it?
 
If someone said to us lot a couple of years ago that in two years time we'd have Van Persie, Mata, Di Maria and Falcao at our club you'd probably tell them to put the glue down. This whole thing is a bit surreal.
 
Basically, the Falcao/Rooney/van Persie issue is something unique to our club and I personally think it's an absurd signing.

If we continue to play two strikers and an AM then I don't think it's too much at all. There is plenty of room for rotation there.
 
My only point was that no-one has a world class player on the bench despite all the rhetoric by managers/directors of football at the top clubs. It just doesn't happen. Turns out you can maybe argue that's true of Bayern/Gotze but then he can play in any of 6 positions - and that's something he did last year to get the necessary game time. I don't think anyone would argue any of the others are "world class" by any definition and that includes those at City.

For the most part the reason they have expensive benches is mainly because of the players' age, potential and long-term contribution to the squad. They're brought in as squad players with the potential to challenge for the first team. That's not really the case here. We just bought another world class player, in his prime, to either stick on the bench or bench one of the few world class players we have in the squad.

Basically, the Falcao/Rooney/van Persie issue is something unique to our club and I personally think it's an absurd signing. I don't think it's a van Gaal signing and don't expect him to work miracles at all. The club has brought in some very good players which will bolster the squad considerably and I'm more than happy with how things have went on the whole. I just think this particular signing is the wrong one.
Well you could say that Barca had Fabregas on the bench, so their midfield situation was like our striker situation. Or Muller at Bayern last season, though he obviously played loads.

I agree with you that this makes no sense, but if the Van Persie needing surgery story is true then maybe we do need one. Surgery at his age would probably make him decline loads, though the question then would be why not just give welbeck games. Maybe van Gaal decided he's not deadly enough or doesn't get in good positions enough and just decided he doesn't have what it required, or maybe (more likely) welbeck just wants to leave. That would leave us with Rooney and Wilson as fit forwards so a loan deal with falcao makes sense. Only in that rather unlikely scenario thoughm
 
Well he'll be 32 this time next year. Why wait on a world class striker if one comes available, then it's all "Why weren't win in for Falcao when he was available!?".
This. I think we have missed out on some class strikers before and we want to make sure we don't make that same mistake.
 
If someone said to us lot a couple of years ago that in two years time we'd have Van Persie, Mata, Di Maria and Falcao at our club you'd probably tell them to put the glue down. This whole thing is a bit surreal.

True, but if they told us we weren't guaranteed champions league despite having those players you'd try and have them sectioned.
 
I'm listening RMC, and they are humbled by this one.
 
Still can't make much sense of it after I've got over the shock/excitement.

Can't help but feel Jorge Mendes has talked us into this and it raises questions about our long term plan if there is one.

At the same time I'm more confident than I should be about QPR at OT next time out.
 
Ahh just woke up to this wonderful news. Loan deal makes total sense now. We use the Hernandez/Welbeck/Cleverley money to sign him on loan, and give RVP a year to prove his fitness. If he's done, we'll sign Falcao if he sets the world alight. Can't fecking wait to see what LVG can do with him.
 
:lol: SSN host is still he saying the loan deal is from Real Madrid to Man Utd? Why the feck is no one correcting him?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.