Radamel Falcao image 9

Radamel Falcao Colombia flag

2014-15 Performances


View full 2014-15 profile

5.4 Season Average Rating
Appearances
29
Goals
4
Assists
5
Yellow cards
2
Status
Not open for further replies.
Falcao is tremendous player when fit. I'm hoping he's being eased in. We need his goals.
 
The Mail article also says that we are keen to recruit a world class goal scorer next season, but if that isn't Falcao then I don't have a clue as to who it might be. Maybe Madrid might want to take a punt on Falcao and then Benzema would be available but I highly doubt that. There aren't many top class strikers available, are there?
 
If we don't sign Falcao, who is out there we could go for?

If (!) Van Gaal doesn’t believe in Falcao’s fitness, a typical move would be… not signing anyone but bringing back Ángelo Henríquez from Dinamo Zagreb; and as far as we know that is exactly what he wants to do. Of course Henríquez is still young and he hasn’t played on the big stage yet, but that is how Van Gaal is working as far as I have understood his way of coaching.

(Remember the situation at Bayern a few years ago, when the bosses wanted to spend big money for a new player and Van Gaal said: “No, I have seen this young guy called Alaba in our own youth team. I will try with him.”) With Rooney and Van Persie around – and Van Gaal seems to have unbelievable trust in Van Persie –Henríquez could grow in the “shadow”.

However, the case of Falcao becomes weird. Yesterday, his return date was 8th Nov, wasn’t it? And now it says no return date? If he is not playing against Crystal, let’s hope it’s only a precautionary measure.
 
I think he just has to get fit, if he isn't ready for Palace then I will be a little worried.

If we don't sign Falcao, who is out there we could go for?

Saido Berahino. Fast, two footed, natural finisher, young, English.

Also he would cost around half of what Falcao would cost...and then there's the wages.
 
Saido Berahino. Fast, two footed, natural finisher, young, English.

Also he would cost around half of what Falcao would cost...and then there's the wages.

Have to be aware of the one season wonder syndrome that seems to strike young English players with alarming regularity. I do like him, however, from what I've seen.
 
Here's a link to an article explaining the process. In principle there are sanctions if teams provide inaccurate information. Nonetheless, there's some gamemenship. But, introducing such a system would be an improvement over what we have now.

http://www.ehow.com/list_6714978_nfl-injury-report-rules.html

If you ask me, I'm all for the implementation of such system. Personally, I wouldn't mind the authorities striking at United with such sanctions for not providing information to their own fans about a player's recovery update.

When I think of the Falcao situation, it is fecking depressing that we don't get more news about his injury. He should be playing as our lone striker instead of Van Persie, end of.
 
No Falcao again this weekend according to Mark Ogden.
 
Bloody hell. Fcuking frustrating. He won't be "match-fit" until January at this rate.

Thanks to bloody Phil Jones.
 
Who knows whether or not this might relate to his cruciate ligament injury? If it does, he could be out a lot longer yet.
 
Who knows whether or not this might relate to his cruciate ligament injury? If it does, he could be out a lot longer yet.

This is the kind of post that leads to, 2 or 3 pages later:

"Can't believe his knee is fecked again"
 
Bloody hell. Fcuking frustrating. He won't be "match-fit" until January at this rate.

Thanks to bloody Phil Jones.

It's got nothing to do with Phil Jones.

My mind goes back to that bizarrely lengthy medical and the now infamous 'covered knee' photo...

I'm cynical and probably being paranoid, but I'm starting to get a bad feeling about Falcao, and indeed for Falcao - the guy seems like such a nice fella who was overjoyed to be here.

When strikers don't hit the ground running at a new club their chances of success are lower, especially at United, and especially in those approaching 30.

It's embarrassing for the club if he's turned up here crocked and we're basically just paying his wages for a season so he can sit in the treatment room.
 
Based on Ogden's reporting, the "knock" story is becoming less plausible.



By Mark Ogden

11:51AM GMT 06 Nov 2014

comments.gif
11 Comments


It appears nonsensical now, as Radamel Falcao battles for form and fitness at Manchester United, but the Colombian forward harboured genuine hopes of appearing at the World Cup this summer, just five months after suffering a cruciate knee ligament injury.

Falcao tore the anterior cruciate ligament in his left knee while playing in Monaco’s French Cup tie against Monts d'or Azergues on January 22.

Yet having performed surgery on the player three days later, surgeon Jose Carlos Noronha raised the prospect of a swift return in time for Brazil by claiming the operation, ‘went well and the light at the end of the tunnel isn’t small’.

Jose Pekerman, the Colombia coach, even included Falcao in his provisional 30-man squad for the tournament before reluctantly cutting the country’s most iconic player from his final 23-man selection on June 9.

Now contrast Falcao’s unwinnable race against time with the road to recovery taken by Arsenal winger Theo Walcott, who suffered the same injury as the United striker – a torn anterior cruciate ligament – on January 4.

Related Articles
Walcott missed the World Cup – he was never given a hope of making Roy Hodgson’s squad once the injury was confirmed – and only returned to action for his club at the weekend, with a ten-minute substitute appearance against Burnley at the Emirates.

The 25-year-old is regarded by Arsene Wenger as still being some distance from full fitness, with the Arsenal manager determined to ease Walcott back into action gently.

Falcao has not been afford the luxury of similar patience, however, and the player and United are both losing out as a result of that.

With Monaco’s finances dictating that Falcao’s £335,000-a-week wages had to be offloaded this summer, just 12 months after his £53m arrival from Atletico Madrid, the forward found himself back in action at the beginning of August when he played and scored against Arsenal in the Emirates Cup in London

His move to United followed at the end of the month, but to date, Falcao has made just five appearances – three starts and two from the bench – and scored one goal.

He has missed the last two games with a calf injury and will not be fit to face Crystal Palace at Old Trafford on Saturday.

Three months into his loan move, which is costing United a £6m loan fee and £265,000-a-week in wages, Falcao is beginning to resemble an expensive gamble, particularly with Danny Welbeck giving Arsenal plenty of value for money following his £16 million arrival from Manchester.

United have already agreed a fee with Monaco and personal terms with Falcao over a permanent move to Old Trafford next summer, but the question now is how long it will take him to return to his best – if, indeed, he can.

Hindsight suggests that he was rushed back far too early by Monaco, especially when his rehabilitation period is measured against Walcott’s.

The risk every player faces when returning from a long-term injury are the minor setbacks which are beginning to afflict Falcao.

He is suffering from being in a Catch-22 situation.

If his appearances are sporadic, he will take longer to rediscover form and fitness, yet if he pushes his body beyond what it is currently capable of, he will sustain new injuries.

The 28-year-old is a popular figure within the dressing-room at United, with club staff also remarking how surprisingly humble and amenable the player is.

Despite his status as a global superstar, Falcao’s down-to-earth personality has proved disarming, as has his determination to overcome his fitness problems.

There is hope that, by missing the visit of Palace this weekend, Falcao will sit out Colombia’s friendly against the United States at Craven Cottage next Friday and also the trip to Ljubljana to face Slovenia four days later, in order to fine tune his fitness at United’s Aon Training Centre.

Louis van Gaal remains convinced that Falcao will succeed at United and become a prolific goalscorer in the Premier League, but so far the gamble has yet to pay off.

United are prepared to be patient, though, simply because they believe the rewards could be spectacular if Falcao regains the form that made him the most sought-after forward in world football prior to his injury.

- Falcao one of 16 Man Utd players struck down by injury curse
 
Rushed back indeed. And 4 years younger than Walcott so you can generally assume he'd need at least as long to fully heal.

It does sound like a case of he costs too much to not be playing.
 
It's not worth keeping him if he can't stay fit. I love Falcao, but that's the harsh reality. I really hope he is back after the international break.
 
The question is whether he will ever be able to play to the level he did before. He's been one of the best strikers in Europe for years now and I'd love to see him reproduce that form for us, but................
 
So basically, who is the bastard we should blame for rushing him back too early? Monaco?

Even so, the lack of transparency from United in this case is not excusable.
 
So basically, who is the bastard we should blame for rushing him back too early? Monaco?

Even so, the lack of transparency from United in this case is not excusable.
There's no obligations to be transparent, as far as I know. And that's assuming the club hasn't been transparent
 
A 'knock' eh? A 'knock' that keeps you out for 3 weeks? I smell bullshit.

As for his recovery period, I thought the general consensus was that he didn't rush back?
 
So basically, who is the bastard we should blame for rushing him back too early? Monaco?

Even so, the lack of transparency from United in this case is not excusable.

I think the blame lies with our medical team who evaluated him before we signed off on the deal, and if they didn't drop the ball then whoever overruled them and signed him anyway.

A fully fit Falcao with a run of games under his belt is one of the best strikers in world football. However, there is a big question whether he can get to that stage before the end of the season with us. If not, signing him was a catastrophe because we paid nearly £20m (including fees to agents etc...) for him on loan and £265,000 a week for a player who we should really have known couldn't perform at his best during his time with us.
 
It's not worth keeping him if he can't stay fit. I love Falcao, but that's the harsh reality. I really hope he is back after the international break.

In all seriousness we are paying whatever wages, there comes a time no where we can send him back to have his treatment back at his 'parent' club. Or because we have this option to sign does that change things (obviously you would only do this if you were not planning on signing him).

If it gets to Xmas / new yr, and he's still on similar number of appearances then what?

I want him to be a success but it all seems odd to me
 
So basically, who is the bastard we should blame for rushing him back too early? Monaco?

Even so, the lack of transparency from United in this case is not excusable.

Huh? What do you want United to tell you?
 
He needs to skip the two Colombia friendlies. Draw a line under the Arsenal game, that is when his season starts proper hopefully,
 
So basically, who is the bastard we should blame for rushing him back too early? Monaco?

Even so, the lack of transparency from United in this case is not excusable.
Did you not get the phone call? You clearly aren't a top red then, tut tut.
 
I think the blame lies with our medical team who evaluated him before we signed off on the deal, and if they didn't drop the ball then whoever overruled them and signed him anyway.

A fully fit Falcao with a run of games under his belt is one of the best strikers in world football. However, there is a big question whether he can get to that stage before the end of the season with us. If not, signing him was a catastrophe because we paid nearly £20m (including fees to agents etc...) for him on loan and £265,000 a week for a player who we should really have known couldn't perform at his best during his time with us.

I would put a big part of the blame on our medical staff too considering how shit they have been for more than 6 years. Sometimes, I feel we are fecking worse than Real Madrid when it comes to injury woes. It's not even a compliment when I compare our medical staff with Madrid's; they were/are both awful with injury management.

This whole thing is a disaster so far. I would come nowhere near buying the player from Monaco unless he can really fire all cylinders.

Huh? What do you want United to tell you?

Say bluntly that he is injured to *insert part of the body here* and that he is not expected to come back until *x amount of time*.

I'm all with KeninDC when it comes to implement a system/protocol where it becomes even more difficult for the club to hide anything or lie to the public.
 
Last edited:
I don''t mind it. You can put rough estimates on recovery times but why tell millions of people so and so will be back on this date, only to have to make another announcement when he has a setback. Cue the twitter/facebook crowd: "But you said..." Etc etc. Also, on a less important note, it's not very smart to go round letting your opponents know exactly who will and will not be available. Look at the thing we had with Diego Costa recently. Aguero was rumoured to be out too, turned out to be false for an example on the other side of the coin.

Would rather the club dealt with it and left us to support the ones who are on the field.
 
Say bluntly that he is injured to *insert part of the body here* and that he is not expected to come back until *x amount of time.

I'm all with KeninDC when it comes to implement a system/protocol where it becomes even more difficult for the club to hide anything or lie to the public.

That won't happen, because this principal is not for anxious fans but for the league, who in the case of the NFL wanted to avoid fixed games.
And in Europe (England included) you will not see a club divulge 'bluntly' medical reports to the press, the league, the uefa or fifa maybe but not the press.
 
This is starting to get more concerning by the day. This will be his third game missed with a 'knock.'
 
Wow, the Walcott injury really does put things into perspective. Rushed back and I think the "niggles" will persist for a while.
 
I'm sure we won't be giving a single penny for him if he continues he's injury or scoring form so I'm not worried, however spending the apparent 300k wages for someone who isn't playing is worrying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.