wr8_utd
Ripped :'(
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2008
- Messages
- 39,042
He left around half hour after the game with Anderson apparently. So the rumors of him storming out appear to be nonsense.
Players reputations go up by not playing, he was absolutely shocking against a league one side last week so Wilson deserved the spot on the bench.
Well... for his price tag he should scoring at least 2/3 goals per game.
Players reputations go up by not playing, he was absolutely shocking against a league one side last week so Wilson deserved the spot on the bench.
Even Messi and Ronaldo don't do that!
Wilson wasn't any better. He's only had a few cameos but he's looked like a headless chicken most of the time. Falcao is more likely to get you a goal so should've been on the bench IMO. Baffling to be honest.Players reputations go up by not playing, he was absolutely shocking against a league one side last week so Wilson deserved the spot on the bench.
Wilson wasn't any better. He's only had a few cameos but he's looked like a headless chicken most of the time. Falcao is more likely to get you a goal so should've been on the bench IMO. Baffling to be honest.
Even Messi and Ronaldo don't do that!
Wut? Ronaldo has 33/28 goals per game this season. Much more than 2/3 I said about Falcao's possibilities.
Ronaldo is averaging just over a goal a game, in your post you said 2 or 3 goals a game or do you mean two thirds of a goal a game?
Wut? Ronaldo has 33/28 goals per game this season. Much more than 2/3 I said about Falcao's possibilities.
He means that they should score a goal every two out of three games.
Eh no he said PER game. It's pretty clear what he meant.
If they were scoring 2/3 goals per game they wo
Eh no he said PER game. It's pretty clear what he meant.
Of course it's pretty clear that I meant 0.(6) goals per game...
No it wasn't. If you had said 0.6 goals per game it would have been obvious but 2/3 goals per game is a shorthand way of saying 2 or 3 goals per game. Someone else thought you meant 2 or 3 goals per game too. As the poster below me says you worded it incorrectly so how could it be clear what you meant?After reading some peoples expectations for Falcao on here it wouldn't surprise me if some people actually expected that sort of return from him which is why I thought that's what you meant.
Why did Wilson "deserve" it?
Well, Wilson was better than him against Yeovil..
He's got the wrong manager to work with from his individual perspective.
Fergie would have fitted him in whenever he can. Other managers would do so because they probably think Falcao can be played into form. LVG's philosophy doesn't subscribe to playing someone into form (except his beloved RVP). If you've been out of the side for injury you have to earn your way back in, or wait for someone else to get injured it seems. Right or wrong Van Gaal is known for his autocratic rule of players and not surprising he's had many bust ups in short spells at clubs.
Ah, then in that case he should start every game over him now.
What 35 m?Why did we spend so much on him? He's fit and he ought to be starting. Leaving a £35m+ out of the squad seems to be a decision only a loony would make.
He's on loan.Why did we spend so much on him? He's fit and he ought to be starting. Leaving a £35m+ out of the squad seems to be a decision only a loony would make.
Nope.So, if you had to decide now, do you cough up the 30 odd million plus a few years of hefty wages for him?
So, if you had to decide now, do you cough up the 30 odd million plus a few years of hefty wages for him?
So, if you had to decide now, do you cough up the 30 odd million plus a few years of hefty wages for him?
Whatever Falcao does for the rest of the season I don't see a scenario which ends with us buying him. van Gaal has repeatedly stated he prefers multi-functional players and this guy just isn't that. We'd be better of investing the money in wide players.
Yep.So, if you had to decide now, do you cough up the 30 odd million plus a few years of hefty wages for him?