Ramos
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2019
- Messages
- 787
Thought about this too. Blackface is bound to happen at some point.Just waiting for their national team to show up in blackface, to "show support".
Thought about this too. Blackface is bound to happen at some point.Just waiting for their national team to show up in blackface, to "show support".
There has to be someone that only draws/paints bananas?
If you say so. I’d get my head kicked in if I referred to a black person as coloured.I don't have to ask extended family, last time I looked in the mirror I was 'coloured'..
If you say so. I’d get my head kicked in if I referred to a black person as coloured.
UKWhere are you from?
Not sure it requires a change in legislation, it is more a change of a process. Then again I am no legal expert. As for redefining the definition of racism, I think you are just digging.I believe that would require change in legislation and redefinition of racism and hate crime. Never going to happen.
Perpetrators get a slap on the wrist, essentially, and released. So a few hundred quid, a handful of pints and some encouragement would likely be enough for a teenage dilinquent with racist tendencies.
UK
I don’t need to get into this. I just can’t see where you are coming from.
Not sure it requires a change in legislation, it is more a change of a process. Then again I am no legal expert. As for redefining the definition of racism, I think you are just digging.
My point is saying a slap on the wrist is not enough, I may not have the solution but whatever the rules are now is clearly not working. If we continue the way we are now we will never progress. Up to the governing boards to do something because campaigns by Sterling etc really have no effect.
At a news conference on Monday, artist Simone Fugazzotto, who always uses monkeys in his work, said: "For an artist there is nothing more important than trying to change the perception of things through his own work.
"I've always been painting monkeys for five to six years, so I thought I'd make this work to teach that we're all apes, I made the western monkey with blue and white eyes, the Asian monkey with almond-shaped eyes and the black monkey positioned in the centre, where everything comes from. The monkey becomes the spark to teach everyone that there is no difference, there is no man or monkey, we are all alike. If anything we are all monkeys."
If you say so. I’d get my head kicked in if I referred to a black person as coloured.
No lets leave it. You have no true understanding of the topic if you think calling somebody 'coloured' would get your head kicked in.
I think the first monkey is supposed to be Asian because the eyes are slanted, the second monkey black because the eyes are dark and the third monkey white because the eyes are blue.
Even the artists far too subtle messaging is based on racial stereotypes.
If you'll take points or disqualify a whole country because of it, the only reaction you'll get from them would be denial and anger (at you, not at racism).If a fan of United did that and we got docked 10 points because of it, you create a culture that it is wrong. I would be pissed that we have lost 10 points but happy to see something of more substance is being done to embed governance.
Now wait until Inter fans tell Lukaku that the fans that call him a monkey are actually using monkeys as a metaphor for human beingsI decided to portray monkeys to talk about racism because they are the metaphor for human beings. Last year I was at the stadium to see Inter v Napoli [a match in which Napoli defender Kalidou Koulibaly was racially abused] and I felt humiliated, everyone was shouting 'monkey' at Koulibaly, a player I respect.
Yeah that is the initial reaction of a child too to throw the toys out the pram. Eventually they learn right and wrong when it is enforced enough times.If you'll take points or disqualify a whole country because of it, the only reaction you'll get from them would be denial and anger (at you, not at racism).
If you'll take points or disqualify a whole country because of it, the only reaction you'll get from them would be denial and anger (at you, not at racism).
The original campaign
OMG you're right; hadn't looked that closely before.I think the first monkey is supposed to be Asian because the eyes are slanted, the second monkey black because the eyes are dark and the third monkey white because the eyes are blue.
Even the artists far too subtle messaging is based on racial stereotypes.
One has to wonder how many sets of internal eyeballs saw this, yet still signed off on it? This was incredible.Unbelievable really how on earth did that get from idea to execution without anyone thinking "maybe not the greatest idea"?
Reminded me of this classic PR disaster:
Bump
Bump
The tweet or the woman posing? Or both?The thing is I don’t believe for a second it’s malicious. It’s just pure ignorance. Whoever it responsible for that, is just completely oblivious to how offensive they are.