Queen Elizabeth II | 1926-2022 | Rest in Peace

As a Non British and non English I can say that this is a lot of bollocks on the thread and the article mentioned in some newspaper. If anyone thinks the Monarch rules then he or she is an idiot. The Monarch is just a puppet. Maybe if the Monarch has some powers it may be a good thing as they will be able to stop these imbeciles in power wrecking the whole country and the world.
The monarch is a puppet of who? The democratically elected government?
 
As a Non British and non English I can say that this is a lot of bollocks on the thread and the article mentioned in some newspaper. If anyone thinks the Monarch rules then he or she is an idiot. The Monarch is just a puppet. Maybe if the Monarch has some powers it may be a good thing as they will be able to stop these imbeciles in power wrecking the whole country and the world.
Outstanding
 
Ruffled a few feathers?

I don’t give a toss. You've got some weird Kent stating Kim Jong would do over prince Charles in a fight.

You think I'm actually arsed about the monarchy? I'm laughing at you while you're laughing at me.

Yesterday was a funeral and I hope to feck someone turns up at one of your loved ones and pisses in all your drinks.
:lol: :lol:
tagline material right there
 
Ruffled a few feathers?

I don’t give a toss. You've got some weird Kent stating Kim Jong would do over prince Charles in a fight.

You think I'm actually arsed about the monarchy? I'm laughing at you while you're laughing at me.

Yesterday was a funeral and I hope to feck someone turns up at one of your loved ones and pisses in all your drinks.
Banned surely?
 
Why focus on the real problems in society when you can just hate on the Windsors.

Wealth inequality and a lack of social mobility is one of the real problems in society and a monarchy is basically that turned into a parade.
 
Wealth inequality and a lack of social mobility is one of the real problems in society and a monarchy is basically that turned into a parade.

But they’re not the cause. It’s our poor excuse for a government who lead the way on that one.
 
Holly Willoughby is beautiful and provides excellent early day television entertainment, yet gets slaughtered for acting like she's above others, and we also don't let her be Queen
Queen wasn't beautiful, didn't provide early day television entertainment, yet we as a society lift her above others and let her be Queen.
Hmmm
 
But they’re not the cause. It’s our poor excuse for a government who lead the way on that one.

They are definitely not the cause. Nor really are your current government, its a long term systemic problem overseen by consecutive governments and crystallised by reverence of idiots in gold hats.
 
Can't really blame them. They probably thought using their powerful influence to get something they don't deserve was fitting for the occasion.

Sorry I was having a bit of fun because the nation's darlings are now public enemy number 1 over queue etiquette. I even quoted the Eric Cantona kung Fu kick commentary. I thought it would have been obvious what I was at.
 
Sorry I was having a bit of fun because the nation's darlings are now public enemy number 1 over queue etiquette. I even quoted the Eric Cantona kung Fu kick commentary. I thought it would have been obvious what I was at.

Don't worry, me and the other intellectuals picked up on it
 
Holly Willoughby is beautiful and provides excellent early day television entertainment, yet gets slaughtered for acting like she's above others, and we also don't let her be Queen
Queen wasn't beautiful, didn't provide early day television entertainment, yet we as a society lift her above others and let her be Queen.
Hmmm
Wtf?

are you trying to be funny? “We also don’t let her be queen”, that doesn’t make any sense at all
 
Wtf?

are you trying to be funny? “We also don’t let her be queen”, that doesn’t make any sense at all

I'm 100% serious. I think there a few valid reasons as to why we could switch to her. I'm open to arguments though

Edit: If you don’t like Holly, I have other suggestions!
If you’re a fan of early daytime television then I think you’ll be pleasantly surprised
 
Last edited:
They are definitely not the cause. Nor really are your current government, its a long term systemic problem overseen by consecutive governments and crystallised by reverence of idiots in gold hats.

It’s a long term problem caused by consecutive governments which hold the same values, goals, and ambitions. So yes, the root problem is the government. The so-called reverence for idiots in pointy hats actually has nothing to do with it. If people like the royal family then they’re very much entitled to.
 
They are definitely not the cause. Nor really are your current government, its a long term systemic problem overseen by consecutive governments and crystallised by reverence of idiots in gold hats.
I don't blame the Tory governments. Tories are gonna Tory. I blame the millions of working people who vote for them and can't see what they are doing.
 
It’s a long term problem caused by consecutive governments which hold the same values, goals, and ambitions. So yes, the root problem is the government. The so-called reverence for idiots in pointy hats actually has nothing to do with it. If people like the royal family then they’re very much entitled to.


Yes of course but your issue was with people disliking them for whatever reason, as tenuous as you think it is or not , which they're also very much entitled to.
 
Holly Willoughby is beautiful and provides excellent early day television entertainment, yet gets slaughtered for acting like she's above others, and we also don't let her be Queen
Queen wasn't beautiful, didn't provide early day television entertainment, yet we as a society lift her above others and let her be Queen.
Hmmm
The Queen was very pretty when she was Holly Willoughby's age, by the beauty standards of the time. Let's see what kind of a 96-year-old Holly makes.

Can't argue about the breakfast TV thing.
 
Yes of course but your issue was with people disliking them for whatever reason, as tenuous as you think it is or not , which they're also very much entitled to.

No it wasn’t. My issue is those who seem to think the monarchy still rule the country and are the root cause of all inequality.
 
No it wasn’t. My issue is those who seem to think the monarchy still rule the country and are the root cause of all inequality.

Nobody thinks that, but they are a nice distillation for the wealth concentration and lack of social mobility that is the issue in society.

They are a very powerful symbol too, even during the parliament run empire it was all done in the name of the crown, so the monarchy's association with power works both ways..

I was reading today that they are exempt from 106 laws that the rest of you need to obey.

Also in the same article it said Charlie officially met with the government 36 times from. 2010 to 2013.
 
The wealth gap has grown massively over the past 12 years there is no getting away from that. I'm not a fan of New Labour but there is a definite difference between Tories and even them.


That is a wider issue than just Britain, and I'm not defending the Tories. I despise them.
 
Nobody thinks that, but they are a nice distillation for the wealth concentration and lack of social mobility that is the issue in society.

They are a very powerful symbol too, even during the parliament run empire it was all done in the name of the crown, so the monarchy's association with power works both ways..

I was reading today that they are exempt from 106 laws that the rest of you need to obey.

Also in the same article it said Charlie officially met with the government 36 times from. 2010 to 2013.

They’re mascots paraded in gilded cages to suit the needs of the government. No power, no control. I’m sure they do their share of lobbying but there are far more unscrupulous people who do the same, with bigger clout.

If they disappeared off the face of the Earth and all their wealth absorbed by the state it wouldn’t make the slightest bit of difference to me, or to those who are struggling, homeless etc. The nation wouldn’t be better off, the people wouldn’t be better off. That money would be spunked on a private NHS contract for Boris’ mate or corporate tax cuts.
 
They’re mascots paraded in gilded cages to suit the needs of the government. No power, no control. I’m sure they do their share of lobbying but there are far more unscrupulous people who do the same, with bigger clout.

If they disappeared off the face of the Earth and all their wealth absorbed by the state it wouldn’t make the slightest bit of difference to me, or to those who are struggling, homeless etc. The nation wouldn’t be better off, the people wouldn’t be better off. That money would be spunked on a private NHS contract for Boris’ mate or corporate tax cuts.


Grand, people are entitled to dislike them for whatever reason they want to, even if it is symbollic, because symbolism is extremely powerful. The argument that the government are worse is not any endorsement for the monarchy in my mind.

And as for the people who should be getting it, it doesn't matter to them whether it's Boris or Charlie that is buying crowns or places on management boards. Just despise them both is my solution
 
Grand, people are entitled to dislike them for whatever reason they want to, even if it is symbollic, because symbolism is extremely powerful. The argument that the government are worse is not any endorsement for the monarchy in my mind.

It’s not a case of who’s worse as there’s not really any comparison between the two. Blaming the monarchy for the shit state of this country is like blaming Fred The Red for the sad state of the club in recent years. And there’s a few in this thread who have been doing that.