Do you mean that managers shouldn't be racists or that you want to talk about football without societial issues getting into the conversation?Keep the race stuffs out of football, please.
Do you mean that managers shouldn't be racists or that you want to talk about football without societial issues getting into the conversation?Keep the race stuffs out of football, please.
At which point is it important that teams actually represent the racial composition of the country/city that they play for? Because at the moment, it seems like a very, very obvious double standard that no-one is allowed to comment on.
I'm no expert, but i don't think many muslim women are allowed to play football. That's definitely a factor.
Just reading the quotes, I don't think he's saying anything outrageous. It depends how the person take it. It's reasonable to ask if they can skip fasting as it does affecting performance if you don't eat well and have to do intense sport.
Plenty of time I was asked to do field inspection/work on Sunday when it supposed to be a sacred day for Christian. I don't feel in anyway offended. So yeah, it depends on how a person takes it. And also the way they were asked.
I don't think there are many Muslim men in the England team either. I was talking about the lack of black or any non-white players.
Unless you have a condition you wouldn't be able to, it's compulsory for most muslim sects as far as I'm aware.
I don't think it's that similar tbh. I know so many people who identify as Christian but Sunday is just another day to them. Even the ones that go to church sometimes skip it if they have other plans.
I would imagine Muslim footballers are quite aware that fasting may have an impact on performance, it's not going to be news to them, so the fact that they fast regardless shows that they have made their decision on the matter (the decision being that observing their faith is worth the impact on football performance, which is absolutely their right to do so). It is - at the least - very tone-deaf of a non-Muslim to ask if they would stop fasting in order to perform better on the football pitch.
So how did he know if someone overly religious without asking?? I don't know how he posed the question or request though.
With fasting, you can "skip" any days, then "pay" (do the fasting days they skip) them later when the fasting month is over.
It was an ignorant and borderline bigoted thing to say by that poster.I don't think there are many Muslim men in the England team either. I was talking about the lack of black or any non-white players.
My point is it's not necessary or appropriate to even ask the question. Either the answer is yes, I practice, and therefore I will be fasting, or the answer is no, I don't practice. Either way, the player himself has made their decision and doesn't need to be asked about it.
I managed an ESL school for many years, plenty of students would observe Ramadan and come to class tired as a result. It would never occur to me to ask if they could stop fasting so that they might be more engaged in class, because it's not my place and the students themselves are clearly already aware that their energy levels are different when they are fasting, so it would be completely tone-deaf to bring it up.
As others pointed out playing a football match isn't a valid exemption to allow for a fidya payment to make it up.I don't know. This is paid work related and in competition that massively rely on physical condition. Unless there's a threat behind it, I think it's a fair question to ask, whether they'll refuse or not is not the issue.
As others pointed out playing a football match isn't a valid exemption to allow for a fidya payment to make it up.
Majority of Muslims take Ramadan seriously and that should be respected. At the top level I haven't seen many players lose significant form over Ramadan, in some cases the players carry on like normal or sometimes perform better (e.g Benzema, Salah).
But it's a personal choice imo, it's not something that should be imposed, so if a player doesn't want to fast that's OK too.
Please go back to your BNP meeting, thanksIts weird because when the England Lionesses don't have any black players, everyone cries that their team "doesn't represent the racial diversity of England : https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/lionesses-euro-2022-women-football-b2135633.html
And yet when France (literally a white European country) men's team has a squad that is around 80% black/Arab which is not even remotely close to the actual racial composition of France, you are called a racist if you even notice that its strange that France has a team that contains pretty much no white players: https://footballarroyo.co.uk/wp-con...joins-Mbappe-Benzema-and-Dembele-in-Qatar.jpg
At which point is it important that teams actually represent the racial composition of the country/city that they play for? Because at the moment, it seems like a very, very obvious double standard that no-one is allowed to comment on.
Exactly. The coach made a reasonable request, and it was rejected. And it seems like there's no repercussion by refusing.
I don't know what's in their contract or PSG policy, though.
It's nice of you not to think of yourself as bigoted. Ramadan isn't a random thing, it's a very big part of the Islamic religion and you know that your players who are Muslim (Which a manager should) will be taking part in this. It comes across as very ignorant to expect them to not take part in this just because of football when Muslims around the world have been playing football while fasting without issue for years.
That's where you're wrong, if you don't fast when you can, then you're defo 10000% not a Muslim. It's one of the pillars of the religion.I could be wrong on this, but I'd imagine that not all Muslims fast for Ramadan. Just like not all Christians observe Lent. So in that case, he might not have assumed that a player would be fasting just because he is Muslim.
In response to the bolded, I doubt that playing without eating/drinking during daylight hours is optimal. So obviously it is untrue that they have been doing it without issue.
The country of France may not have such diversity yet they will have a lot of players qualify due to colonialism. A lot of Frances best ever players could have played for other nations.
This is something I’m surprised England doesn’t have more of and not just because of colonialism but also because of free movement of people in Europe.
While this issue in general isn’t offensive as it appears to be a genuine fact, how it is highlighted and for what purpose could be considered nefarious. The way it has been reported the manager approached the subject definitely appears to be racially motivated.
With comments like that has he thought to join the Conservative Party?
He was already gone at PSG and this will just exopodite it.
But I don't think that's what has happened here, the quote says the following:
“The weeks leading up to Ramadan were a time for CG to continually complain that we had 'too many Muslim players' in the squad. »
That's the bigoted part of it.
I think the point they are making is that apparently it is problematic socially when teams from a predominantly white European country don’t have much representation of other races in said team - but that when a team from a predominantly white European country has majority other race and not white then it’s not considered a problem.It isn't important in the slightest. Why would it be? This is a weird and to be honest worrying post.
If the leaked email is to be believed, it's more than just about fasting, it's straight up racism and islamophobia.True. I'd assume he complained not because the players are having Muslim as religion, but most likely because of those fasting period that he has problem with.
But then, I could be wrong. The sentence does sound bigotry.
I stand corrected then.
People (including managers) shouldn't be racist, and that would help us to talk about football without racism issues getting into the conversation.Do you mean that managers shouldn't be racists or that you want to talk about football without societial issues getting into the conversation?
That's where you're wrong, if you don't fast when you can, then you're defo 10000% not a Muslim. It's one of the pillars of the religion.
No matter what one's name sounds like, his upbringing, if one doesn't fast when nothing prevents it, then he's or she's not a Muslim.
So all Muslims fast in essence
Fidyah or fidya (Arabic: الفدية) and kaffara or kaffarah (Arabic: كفارة) are religious donations made in Islam when a fast (notably in Ramadan) is missed or broken. The donations can be of food, or money, and it is used to feed those in need. They are mentioned in the Qur'an. Some organizations have online fidyah and kaffara options.
If the leaked email is to be believed, it's more than just about fasting, it's straight up racism and islamophobia.
We are talking about different things. What you posted doesn't fall under the category of what I said about people not fasting when they can.Are you sure about that? 5 minutes on google and I‘ve found this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fidyah_and_kaffara
And this
https://islamic-relief.org/kaffarah/
Astonishing takeJust reading the quotes, I don't think he's saying anything outrageous. It depends how the person take it. It's reasonable to ask if they can skip fasting as it does affecting performance if you don't eat well and have to do intense sport.
Plenty of time I was asked to do field inspection/work on Sunday when it supposed to be a sacred day for Christian. I don't feel in anyway offended. So yeah, it depends on how a person takes it. And also the way they were asked.
This is a much more intelligent post than the one that was being replied to.What a facepalm of a post. If no-one is allowed to comment on this then how did you?
As for your "literally a white European country" (JFC) here's what you can do: build a time machine, go back to 1534 and convince Cartier not to start claiming other parts of the world for France. If you can't do that, don't complain that the people descended from the French colonies now make up the vast majority of the best footballers in that country. Unless you think France should be picking worse white players over more talented ones of Arab/African/Caribbean descent.
And the Lionesses have few minority players because there are few minority women in the game at grassroots level.
This is if you're unable to fast for a specific reason (if you're ill or something).Are you sure about that? 5 minutes on google and I‘ve found this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fidyah_and_kaffara
And this
https://islamic-relief.org/kaffarah/
We are talking about different things. What you posted doesn't fall under the category of what I said about people not fasting when they can.
I meant that if someone purposely doesn't fast, when all the conditions are perfect for him to do so then that person isn't a Muslim.
Strict meritocracy is awesome when
1. Structural inequalities don't exist
2. You pretend structural inequalities don't exist
3. Your method for evaluating merit is 100% objective
I literally know a guy who describes and considers himself a Muslim (his parents' faith) but since he lived in Western Europe all his life he's really not the strictest when it comes to pillars, yet again it doesn't mean he ignores them all and the religion still plays a big role in his life. Not to mention scores of other Muslim lads I'd have met who'd enjoy an occasional drink or other stuff not necessarily allowed by the religion. This approach "you're either a fully devoted worshipper or you're not one of us" strikes me a bit as gatekeeping. In all honesty, I'm sure that in my home country there are quite a few of hardlines that'd also go "oh if you don't go to church every Sunday, don't respect lent, don't do the X, Y, Z, you're not a real Catholic". I'm not buying it - I'm not religious at all, but vast majority of the religious people I know (and from different religions too) are relatively big hypocritesI meant that if someone purposely doesn't fast, when all the conditions are perfect for him to do so then that person isn't a Muslim.