Volumiza
The alright "V", B-Boy cypher cat
Because, based on specs, the PSVR2 looks to be a big step forward from the Quest.Why?
Twice the resolution, eye tracking and I’m really looking forward to what the sensory things will add.
Because, based on specs, the PSVR2 looks to be a big step forward from the Quest.Why?
Because, based on specs, the PSVR2 looks to be a big step forward from the Quest.
Twice the resolution, eye tracking and I’m really looking forward to what the sensory things will add.
Because you have a PS5, and depending on your expectations Quest 2 might leave you underwhelmed. Depends on what you're looking for I guess. Quest is based on a mobile phone chipset, its great but PSVR2 and PS5 will show it up and with the recent news its reasonable to expect it this year. Wait and then make your mind up...
Cost and comfort, and wireless is not 100% reliable yet. They will probably release a wireless version in the future. Personally, I don't see the big deal, no cables would be better but just one is fine.Not into VR at all so somehow it passed me by…but why is the new psvr not wireless? Seems like a major oversight by Sony
Well don't say I didn't warn ya.Is it wireless? Will it have support for as many games as Quest?
I have a Quest 1 which I was bored of within a week, but the Quest 2 seems to be a huge step up on that and has a ton of games. As Lambs said earlier, you have the option of hooking it up to a PC to play some of the more demanding games. There's the Quest 3 coming too which seems a good option.
Cost and comfort, and wireless is not 100% reliable yet. They will probably release a wireless version in the future. Personally, I don't see the big deal, no cables would be better but just one is fine.
Well don't say I didn't warn ya.
Yes it's wireless but all the best games will be on the one made by the gaming company with decades of experience. You won't be getting anything like Astrobot or the new Horizon VR. Hell you'll be lucky to get anything like Half Life Alyx again judging by the imminent death of PCVR in favour of mobile/Quest style gaming. You have most of the PCVR people saying they're day one on PSVR2, and you already have a PS5 but no PCVR capable PC? Any big PC games will get ported over as they do now (but easier due to specs and hardware), and how expensive is a good VR capable GPU nowadays anyway? No brainer right? Seriously look into it!
To me this is really one of those situations where you could be gutted that you got a Quest instead of a PSVR2, but as it's you, the bitterness would be somewhat entertaining. So go for whatever one...
PratmanPrat.
Ehhh.....So...
Couldn't give a shit when MS bought Zenimax. Kind of don't care about the current Activision Blizzard acquisition, but if they can turn current Blizzard back into a good game developer again, that will be massive.
I think they'd have to make the games console exclusives at the minimum to force people over on xbox platform, but that is definitely a move that has potential.
It was inevitable they would go down that road at some point, the revenue streams are too obvious to leave on the table. As long as it's not detrimental to the big single player studios, as in, they keep the usual content coming and don't find a way to shoehorn live services into that, it's all good.Been so much talk in here around Gamepass model encourages live service and multiplayer games which is a route PS owners had no interest in, and now Sony have said they plan to launch 10 live service games in the next 4 years.. love it.
Agree with this. If the platforms offer more stuff that isn't really an issue. I might not care for destiny, halo and the likes but a lot of people do, as long as I keep getting final fantasy, the witcher, hollow knight, God of war etc, I won't be talking down others getting entertainment.It was inevitable they would go down that road at some point, the revenue streams are too obvious to leave on the table. As long as it's not detrimental to the big single player studios, as in, they keep the usual content coming and don't find a way to shoehorn live services into that, it's all good.
On the contrary, it is always a concern.Yeah, I had a feeling it wouldn't be a concern anymore
It’s possible to have both. Xbox doesn’t have any, or rather very few, single player, story driven games. I expect that to change in the coming years, however (which is good!).Been so much talk in here around Gamepass model encourages live service and multiplayer games which is a route PS owners had no interest in, and now Sony have said they plan to launch 10 live service games in the next 4 years.. love it.
It’s possible to have both. Xbox doesn’t have any, or rather very few, single player, story driven games. I expect that to change in the coming years, however (which is good!).
Been inevitable since before PS5 launched unfortunately with the partnerships announced - and it is something we as a fanbase have acknowledged the past few years so it isn't like it is unexpected. Bright side is the majority of those 10 are from deals with third party studios or first party studios with multiple teams so though there'll be a number of live service games, we will still have the more platform traditional single player story driven games like Ragnarok, Forbidden Dawn, Spider-Man 2 and Wolverine.Been so much talk in here around Gamepass model encourages live service and multiplayer games which is a route PS owners had no interest in, and now Sony have said they plan to launch 10 live service games in the next 4 years.. love it.
Been inevitable since before PS5 launched unfortunately with the partnerships announced - and it is something we as a fanbase have acknowledged the past few years so it isn't like it is unexpected. Bright side is the majority of those 10 are from deals with third party studios or first party studios with multiple teams so though there'll be a number of live service games, we will still have the more platform traditional single player story driven games like Ragnarok, Forbidden Dawn, Spider-Man 2 and Wolverine.
The live service games are also likely to be more spread in terms of genre. We've already got Dreams as one and MM are rumoured to be making another, Gran Turismo for the racing crowd.
Dreams is an interesting game to mention. It looked really good and I heard some great things but it never seemed to get the recognition it deserved.
Though I suppose it came out at an awkward time late in the PS4's lifespan.
MM have given it a lot of support with free DLC but yeah, so far it hasn't got that recognition. There have been suggestions that they should put it on Spartacus or PC but live service games usually have a revenue stream and that is a difficult thing to do with Dreams as it is especially with the various IP infringement going on in games made. Don't have it myself but seen videos of some amazing experiences.Dreams is an interesting game to mention. It looked really good and I heard some great things but it never seemed to get the recognition it deserved.
Though I suppose it came out at an awkward time late in the PS4's lifespan.
Been so much talk in here around Gamepass model encourages live service and multiplayer games which is a route PS owners had no interest in, and now Sony have said they plan to launch 10 live service games in the next 4 years.. love it.
They have to justify their shitty console with half released games somehow. Leave them to it I say.Just because Sony may be pursuing more GaaS titles that doesn't mean the users are happy.
I can't see me ever playing a GaaS title, no matter who produces and publishes it.
Just because Sony may be pursuing more GaaS titles that doesn't mean the users are happy.
I can't see me ever playing a GaaS title, no matter who produces and publishes it.
Good to see some consistency. Nice one b8.
Feel like games are getting an easy ride on the review front lately. Not sure if it's because we've been starved for games or because so many are sequels and the reviewers are typically the people who love that/those games.
Only lately?
Though I think you are right to question it, of late it's gotten more...coordinated. The two that I've mentioned elsewhere are Sifu with the difficulty and Elden Ring with the ludicrous BOTW comparisons and 10/10 scores. Isn't it just a little weird that they are all basically saying the same things at the same time, whilst arguably being wrong? Dunno, it's off to me.
Elden ring is nothing like BoTW.Only lately?
Though I think you are right to question it, of late it's gotten more...coordinated. The two that I've mentioned elsewhere are Sifu with the difficulty and Elden Ring with the ludicrous BOTW comparisons and 10/10 scores. Isn't it just a little weird that they are all basically saying the same things at the same time, whilst arguably being wrong? Dunno, it's off to me.
I actually think Horizon is fairly accurate yet probably underrated compared to some of the others, if that makes sense. It’s a far more polished, better looking game than Elden Ring with an actual story and life like characters and a crazy amount of combat mechanics and a far more vibrant world. But it’s also not nearly as difficult and full of nasty bosses and oh you can explore here and look at this and do this and bla bla.I'd add Halo too, and potentially Horizon (though I need to play more)
Yeah, probably isn't a new thing. And let's be honest if a game averaged a low 8 then people would think it was mediocre as feck.
That's the problem. A solid 7 is bad now rather than good. A 5 is terrible rather than average. Goes for everything not just game reviews.