DavidDeSchmikes
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2013
- Messages
- 17,995
We’ll decide when you will playIts scheduled to play Tuesday.
Will play tomorrow.
Yes,I would think marching in Manchester with thousands of people protesting the Glazers would do more than today. But, I for sure understand what the supporters did today, I just hope some good comes out if it.
Is this a stock exchange tv channel?
How would disrupting the streets of manchester city centre effect the Glazers? People outside the UK wouldnt careYes,
a massive crowd doing a peaceful protest march through Manchester would have been a far more palatable effort. With respect to some good coming from todays efforts, well thats already happened. Its a main topic among football fans all over the world. Lots of debate over it. That in itself is a huge amount of good to have come from it.
This will go down as a great day in the history of the club.
I'd be interested to learn how many people got hurt before the police started to force people away from the protest. I don't mean the ones who removed people from the stadium, but the lines of officers in riot gear we saw in videos, who started pushing crowds away from where they were gathered outside.
I've never once seen those tactics employed on protests without things ending violently. That said, I'm sure 99% of police officers out there were just doing their job to the best of their ability, and just like the 99% of fans who did a great job protesting, we shouldn't let the 1% wrong 'uns dictate the story of the day.
Who do you think put Eddie in charge of United and left him in that position for 8 years? How are people so blind to something so obvious?United have invested adequately for a club of its stature. The reason for our decline is 3 successive poor managers and 3 successive conflicting and wrong recruitment strategies. There was no clear vision or direction the club was taking post-Ferguson. Things seem like they are slowly changing under Solskjaer. To me this seems like the fault of whoever is/was in an executive position (Woodward) rather than the owners, who have interfered minimally.
Things could truly be a lot worse.
That's true and a very valid point. But I see so many fans critcising a lack of investment, which is patently untrue. We've spent a huge amount of money over the past decade, the bulk of it has just been spent on a disastrous clash of transfer strategies and ideologies.Who do you think put Eddie in charge of United and left him in that position for 8 years? How are people so blind to something so obvious?
They've kept us ticking but we're in an obvious decline and in another 10 years, it'll be worse, not better.
Your point about 'investment' is completely wrong but I've addressed that in a lot of my posts today and feel tired repeating it.That's true and a very valid point. But I see so many fans critcising a lack of investment, which is patently untrue. We've spent a huge amount of money over the past decade, the bulk of it has just been spent on a disastrous clash of transfer strategies and ideologies.
United have spent United's money while continuing to be saddled by Glazer's debt.That's true and a very valid point. But I see so many fans critcising a lack of investment, which is patently untrue. We've spent a huge amount of money over the past decade, the bulk of it has just been spent on a disastrous clash of transfer strategies and ideologies.
United have spent United's money while continuing to be saddled by Glazer's debt.
That people still don't seem to understand this is pretty wild - thinking all the money comes from the Glazer's pockets.
Yet any new owners will have to pay vastly more for the club than Malcolm did, so the fans will resent them for wanting a return on said investment?
Yet any new owners will have to pay vastly more for the club than Malcolm did, so the fans will resent them for wanting a return on said investment?
What investment?
Yet any new owners will have to pay vastly more for the club than Malcolm did, so the fans will resent them for wanting a return on said investment?
Who is “we”?That's true and a very valid point. But I see so many fans critcising a lack of investment, which is patently untrue. We've spent a huge amount of money over the past decade, the bulk of it has just been spent on a disastrous clash of transfer strategies and ideologies.
That's true and a very valid point. But I see so many fans critcising a lack of investment, which is patently untrue. We've spent a huge amount of money over the past decade, the bulk of it has just been spent on a disastrous clash of transfer strategies and ideologies.
We’ve spent our own money, part of what’s left once you deduct their dividends and the massive debt they’ve saddled us with. We shouldn’t thank them for that.That's true and a very valid point. But I see so many fans critcising a lack of investment, which is patently untrue. We've spent a huge amount of money over the past decade, the bulk of it has just been spent on a disastrous clash of transfer strategies and ideologies.
99% of those in attendance today are generational United fans who fill terraces up and down the land - and further afield - wherever and whenever United play. Yet we have bleeding hearts here condemning their actions, the same people who have never set foot in Manchester before, let alone the ground. Go figure.
We have the best supporters in Britain, bar none. If any fanbase can eradicate a parasite, it’s ours. Well in, lads.
Utterly pathetic behavior, shades of angry republicans entering Congress. If we needed proof why governments around the world imposed strict rules during the pandemic, look at Liverpool, Glasgow and Manchester after each episode over the last year. It’s just football, there are other ways to make a point, this is just people needing to break the law.
What investment?
I don't think you follow
Seriously?How would disrupting the streets of manchester city centre effect the Glazers? People outside the UK wouldnt care
It was on ESPN, our main sports channel. But people here don’t really get it. While we’re very passionate about sports, the main purpose for sports owners is to make a profit. The only other reason is for ego/status, say like a Jerry Jones.There much coverage in the states about this?
Would be nice for their leaching ways to be highlighted over there, if nothing more than to embarrass them on the golf course in front of their business buds.
That's true and a very valid point. But I see so many fans critcising a lack of investment, which is patently untrue. We've spent a huge amount of money over the past decade, the bulk of it has just been spent on a disastrous clash of transfer strategies and ideologies.
please check this out. ESPN in USA, their guy was starting to defend United fans and speak truth about glazers and was taken down OH SO FAST
It was done at OT by 4:30ish yeah. Stormed the barriers and a few got into the ground obviously but it did die down quickly because police got their batons out. Would not say it was peaceful protests today, to be fair, but feck itI have the rough impression this protest was relatively short and sweet? They got in, made their point and left?
Is that accurate ?