RedFish
Full Member
Looks like he's going to be very important contender in a few years. Will be interesting to see if sky build around him.
Question of when not if.
Looks like he's going to be very important contender in a few years. Will be interesting to see if sky build around him.
Kristoff?!! Not sure who got that.
Dumoulin as gracious in defeat as he is in victory, with nice comments and giving respect to GT saying he was the strongest rider these past 3 wks and that he could never put him in trouble.
Team Sky are dodgy as f*ck it won't be long until their house of cards falls.
It's true though - US Postal 2.0 and anyone who doesn't see that is naive or refuses to admit the truth. Thomas is talented and always has been, but there's something in the water at Sky that other teams haven't discovered yet.
The riding obviously, I don't really care about internal team drama. That's not the kind of drama I want to see (nor do I think we'll get it, fortunately). It has been like this for years, that's true, but now more than ever the competition comes from near identical riders to those in the Sky team, i.e. Dumoulin and Roglic. They all ride at a steady pace and lack any sort of attacking instinct. I don't necessarily mind a specific team or even rider dominating for several years, as long as there's an interesting battle at the top. This wasn't a battle, it was a procession where everyone seemed comfortable with their own position. The competition just seems to lack ambition.Was this tour a disappointment for some because of the riding(which it's been like for years now....) or simply because Froome/Thomas didn't turn into Hinault/LeMond or Contador/Lance v3?
You may get that drama next year if both stick to Sky.....which I guess they will. But I reckon Thomas goes Giro-Vuelta in 2019. Froome goes for the fifth.
The interesting thing about Sky is how they are achieving their ill-gotten victories, not necessarily the fact they’ve won them. Five Tour de France wins now in six years for them, through three different cyclists, none of which are your classic GT-styled riders. Winning a GT is monumentally difficult yet Sky achieve it nonchalantly with riders with no GT pedigree in their past. Countries with storied histories in cycling have programmes in place to develop world-class cyclists and even they miss the mark quite often but Sky, in the last 6-8 years, have a conveyor belt of talent and a ‘next man up’ policy when it comes to collecting GT victories. It’s preposterous.
Are they blood doping? Mechanical doping? Doping in the knowledge it’s undetectable so they’ve got practically nil chance of getting caught? That, for me, is the intriguing thing about Sky, not the fact they are winning.
Is that the name of their PEDs?You missed the obvious policy of buying the GTs by hoovering up the best talent, team leaders in their own right, by offering them massive wages. There are a number of riders from the other WT teams that would easily win a GT if they rode with the super Doms that Sky employ. It really is that simple.
Is that the name of their PEDs?
3 Words.Is that the name of their PEDs?
You missed the obvious policy of buying the GTs by hoovering up the best talent, team leaders in their own right, by offering them massive wages. There are a number of riders from the other WT teams that would easily win a GT if they rode with the super Doms that Sky employ. It really is that simple.
The main reason I suspect they fail at other teams is they don't have people like themselves as domestiques. Some of them may not even be cut out for grand tours at all, as even the best domestiques are allowed an off-day; it's up to another domestique to step in. When you're the main man, that off-day ruins your GC. I suspect most of them could thrive in the shorter races though, such as Paris-Nice, Tirreno or Dauphiné. For example Richie Porte won PN twice for Sky and I believe Sergio Henao won it once as well.How come these ‘super doms’, as you call them, only really amount to anything when with Sky and flop when they get too big for their boots and try challenge as the leaders of rival teams? It’s all rather convenient.
Meanwhile, Sky, littered with track-cyclists-and-time-triallists-cum-Grand-Tour-legends, win a Tour de France with a modest-pedigree operator like Thomas, who’d never had a top 10 finish in a GT before. It’s almost like we, as spectators, are expected to suspend disbelief and swallow everything Brailsford throws at us. It’s absolutely obscene.
Thomas winning the Tour de France is just ...
He was never, ever a Grand Tour possibility. He was a talented cyclist but not a climber who would win on the big mountains for feck's sake. Sky might have gotten Cavendish a Tour win if they'd wanted to .
This is just ridiculous. So, you belittle his achievement as cyclist just for sake of it.
Thomas still a talented cyclist. He won at Alpe de Huez, a big mountain stage. I doubt you watch it tbh.
You didn't understand me, the fact that he did win at the Alpe de Huez is what is hilarious. I remember Thomas when he was 21 racing for Barloworld. A classics rider, good on a hilly stage and can help out a teammate climber when called upon, but never a GT guy in a million years. Sky have made a mockery of the sport.
You'd have to be new to the sport or have your whole being buried in the sand at this point not to see it.
Some nice names already (apparently) confirmed for Vuelta...
Sunweb: Kelderman
Lotto Soudal: Benoot, Lambrecht (only first half of the race)
BMC: Porte, Teuns
Lotto Jumbo: Bennett, Kruijswijk, van Poppel
Astana: López
Mitchelton-Scott: S. Yates, Caleb Ewan
Bahrain: I. Izagirre, V. Nibali(*)
Cofidis: N. Bouhanni
Quick-Step: Mas, Viviani(?)
FDJ: Pinot
BORA: P. Sagan, Buchmann
Katusha: Zakarin
Team Sky: Kwiatkowski
Movistar: Valverde, Landa, N. Quintana
EF Education: Uran
UAE: Aru
People would've said exactly the same about riders like Dumoulin or Roglic several years ago. It didn't just happen overnight with Thomas either, he steadily improved as an all round rider over the years. Somewhere around 2014 he started truly contesting the classics and then in 2016 he went on to win Paris-Nice. At that point it became clear that if he fully applied himself to climbing he could be a major force in this discipline. The next year he won the Tour of the Alps, which used to be the Giro del Trentino, a real climber's race. He was co-leader for Sky in the Giro and looked a strong candidate before crashing out of the race due to a parked motorcycle. This year he opened strongly with a decent Tirreno finish, winning the Dauphiné and maintaining that form in the Tour.You didn't understand me, the fact that he did win at the Alpe de Huez is what is hilarious. I remember Thomas when he was 21 racing for Barloworld. A classics rider, good on a hilly stage and can help out a teammate climber when called upon, but never a GT guy in a million years. Sky have made a mockery of the sport.
You'd have to be new to the sport or have your whole being buried in the sand at this point not to see it.
Sorry for me not being as smart as you do.
Oh you come from holyland after all milord.
What is a this GT guy for you? super climber like Quintana? or rider like Dumoulin? I remember him from Barloworld. Same as Froome. He maybe not as highly talented as Froome but he is a talented cyclist on his own. He has the same strengh as Froome.
What mockery Sky did to the sport? Salbutamol case? Jiffy bag Wiggins? Winning Tour multiple times?
Seriously, they method surely not pleasing in the eyes but it effective. Nowadays, you just cant win a Tour solely on mountain except you build healthy lead over 5mins buffer for a ITT stages. Many rider in that mould like Roglic, Tom, Froome, Thomas come around. No wonder pure climber tend to struggles
People would've said exactly the same about riders like Dumoulin or Roglic several years ago. It didn't just happen overnight with Thomas either, he steadily improved as an all round rider over the years. Somewhere around 2014 he started truly contesting the classics and then in 2016 he went on to win Paris-Nice. At that point it became clear that if he fully applied himself to climbing he could be a major force in this discipline. The next year he won the Tour of the Alps, which used to be the Giro del Trentino, a real climber's race. He was co-leader for Sky in the Giro and looked a strong candidate before crashing out of the race due to a parked motorcycle. This year he opened strongly with a decent Tirreno finish, winning the Dauphiné and maintaining that form in the Tour.
His credentials in a 3 week grand tour were in doubt due to the endurance required but there weren't really any questions about his ability. He proved that he could last the distance, just as Dumoulin did last year at the Giro. Both grand tour wins are characterised by a relative lack of explosive attacks by their competitors. Dumoulin had to suffer slightly more of those for his Giro win but had more TT kilometers to compensate for that. This year, Thomas barely ever had to react to any attacks so he could so what he does best, riding at a very steady tempo and finishing strongly.
When you look at his journey as a rider and how his Tour was won, it makes a lot more sense than when you just consider "OMG track racer Geraint Thomas won a Tour!!!" without context. There were no heroics or super-human performances involved, just an excellent rider getting to contest a Tour under ideal circumstances.
I never said I was smarter than anyone. You were questioning whether I watched cycling so I was just saying that I've been watching for many years. I'm British so I would have lots of reasons to support Sky if I wanted to, but I'm just not buying it. All of the major cycling forums think the same, it's way, way too good to be true. Whatever it is that they're doing, will surely come out some day.
This guy sums it up pretty succinctly:
"This is a guy who is 32 years old, who prior to this Tour never finished better then 15th in a GT, afaik never managed to have more then 1 decent mountain stage result (6th in 10th stage 2015), who out of the blue became the best rider and climber in the Tour who happens to win Sky's 5th TDF win in 6 years with 3 riders each one having a unique transformation into GC cyclist."
Thomas by winning also smashed a previous record of worst GC finish by a future Tour winner. He had finished 139/140 in his first tour, before joining Sky. Way worse than any other future winner. Coincidentally (or not) the previous record holder in that regard was Wiggins. Froome is also in the top 5.
Those ‘worst GC finish by a future Tour winner’ stats, featuring our three Sky heroes, were obviously due to them not having fluffy pillows or something in previous years.