No foul on Krull. Shoulda involve VAR (why wasn't it anyway?).
Premier League Gameweek 3
- Thread starter Samid
- Start date
They both jumped for the ball fairly, goalie caught it then dropped it. I don't think there was a foul.
He touched him for sure but touching another player is not a foul.
VAR allows stamps. fecking ludicrous.
It is on SoftCafe, they'd call everything!
You are not happy today.
Why are they letting clowns like mariner be In charge of VAR? They should have independent people reviewing it.
You are not happy today.
It's just so ridiculous. I actually like VAR but the clowns using it are being, well, clowns.
I'd throw 40m at Norwich for Godrey and Cantwell.
Apparently Atkinson allowed the goal and it was VAR who overturned the goal for the foul on the goalie.
Well apparently they did and it's VAR that disallowed the goal. But as usual they are doing the poorest job of communicating what actually happened.
He's moved out of his mum's, pays his taxes. What's wrong with him?
I am inclined to agree, people who are not friends of the referees involved. Also some of the referees operating VAR are incompetent themselves.
Norwich are kinda awesome to watch. No fear and suck defensively.
That is the point, they need to communicate what is happening to the fans. It is like some sort of secret society.
Play on you twats! Not a head injury anyway...
We kicked the ball out so he could get seen to and they just threw it back in and played on!
More clubs should be like Bristol City.
Perennial underachievers?
Yes, but also who won't throw the ball out in case of non-head injuries.
Chelsea time wasting big time
Max Aarons isn’t very good. Shows you what the cafe knows about judging footballers.
Chelsea's first win.
Massive win for Chelsea.
City vs Tottenham, guy in front of monitor didnt want to correct wrong decision of best referee in the land (lol) and he didnt even watch a bloody thing. Today Marriner didnt correct his buddy.
Funny how they cant do this shit so obv. when rule is more clear cut (regardless of how dumb the rule is) but push more on subjective side and they so far covering their brothers.
Oh and this is a guy operating VAR on Norwich game.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/man-utd-marriner-arsenal-news-15512875
Funny how they cant do this shit so obv. when rule is more clear cut (regardless of how dumb the rule is) but push more on subjective side and they so far covering their brothers.
Oh and this is a guy operating VAR on Norwich game.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/man-utd-marriner-arsenal-news-15512875
Massive 3 points for their relegation battle.
Same number of points as you lot!
They're doing just that in the Eredivisie this season. Ref communicates (reasoning behind) his decision via stadium speaker after watching the video at the sidelines (I believe). Probably will be adopted by the other leagues if it works well.
Needed win and good goals for Abraham and Mount. We're incredibly open though. Going to be entertaining this season that's for sure.
He is English. Any opinion on him on here can be ignored.
That would be good.
Norwich will finish top 10 this season, they're a very fecking good side. Pukki is a top striker, I like him a lot.
That threatened to be a Chris Foy level stitch up, thankfully we got it done. We were miles better second half, created enough for more goals.
VAR can do one, all my fears summed up in one game.
VAR can do one, all my fears summed up in one game.
The PL wants to avoid at all costs having the ref checking a monitor so i doubt it. But the VAR team should display a clear message for everyone to see as soon as the decision is made.
I think it was the right decision in the end, did you see how clueless the ref was when it happened, he had no idea what to call, he didn't really allow the goal, he was just floating about hoping VAR would save him.
Barging into the keeper in the small box is a foul. Barging into the keeper in general is a foul, but in the small box it's automatic
Mason Mount is going to be a hell of a player.
In the UK they see those fouls on the keeper very differently. There isn’t actually any rule that says the keeper has more protection inside the small box although I know refs here in Portugal and other countries apply it regardless
Sure, depends on what you consider a "barge" though. If two players go for a high ball, they're going to clash on the way down without a foul being committed.
Having said that, I fully expected the goal to be disallowed (I thought it had been instantly) as goalies are more protected than white rhinos.
There isn't? Thought it was. Always heard it explained that if you touch the keeper in the small box, unless you have position and either don't move or jump straight up vertically, it's automatically a foul
I like this Norwich manager.