RedRocket9908
Full Member
Aye cause the prospect of the scousers potentially equalling our 20 league titles is a great alternative.
Is that when we start praying for some of City's to be stripped and awarded to us?
Aye cause the prospect of the scousers potentially equalling our 20 league titles is a great alternative.
This account's model to calculate xG is often different than Opta who is considered reliable for stats collection.I'd love to know how that's calculated since Son in that 1v1 position for the first goal to me was nailed on. He can shoot off either foot and is pretty reliable as you get in that position.
Cause they are not nearly as nailed on as oeople think, The truth is most people feck up that Son chance 9 times outta 10. Ederson should even have saved it today, wasn't a good finish. They don't result in a goal nearly as often as people think.
City will probably still go on to win the league but it’s a lot closer this year. Scousers are better than last year though. Last season city had players like Gundogan chipping in with important goals. He’s been replaced by Kovacic who is a completely different player and hasn’t score yet. So they’ve lost players and not really replaced them. The only one who’s better than the player they lost is probably doku. He’s better than Mahrez.You're just nitpicking a few points here and there and ignore the context. Arsenal is not as good as themselves last season, too. Context is the low form.
I said last few seasons. Mind checking where they were in 2020 2021 after 14 games?
Club Played Won Drawn Lost GF GA GD Points
MCI 14 7 5 2 21 12 9 26
Spurs are luckiest cnuts in the league, how the feck did they draw here, City destroyed them more than Newcastle did to us yesterday.
That doesn't matter because Liverpool will also get 2 more titles.Is that when we start praying for some of City's to be stripped and awarded to us?
I mean I obviously would prefer you guys to win over Liverpool or Arsenal but it's looking quite unlikely this season. I know this is a weekly discussion where everyone just expects City to hit their stride in the second half of the season, they might just be too far off the top this time around. And with KDB returning from a long lay off and all that title winning experience lost it'll be quite impressive if City do it again. Anyway, you guys are likely to go drop points 4 games running midweek as well so it's not looking good right now.
Fair enough. For me I expected him to score once he got into the space. Seems like he must have about 10 goals against City alone.
Defender is 100% wiping him out if play continues anyway.I mean the ref definitely made a mistake but how other City fans can focus on that is beyond me. Grealish is never doing going to achieve anything on his own in that situation
I don't disagree about other teams may make a better account of themselves. My point is only into New Year that usually when the title contenders start to pull away from the rest. A few points less at this stage of season from previous season doesn't say much about lower level. Liverpool got the exact same point they had right now after 14 games for same 2020 2021 season. They topped the table for the calendar year, and only fell off into mid table by the turn of new calendar year, before going on a title winning like run to finish 3rd place. PL was still considerably stronger than other leagues with 2 PL teams in the CL final (us in EL final).City will probably still go on to win the league but it’s a lot closer this year. Scousers are better than last year though. Last season city had players like Gundogan chipping in with important goals. He’s been replaced by Kovacic who is a completely different player and hasn’t score yet. So they’ve lost players and not really replaced them. The only one who’s better than the player they lost is probably doku. He’s better than Mahrez.
We scored 3 goals at the Etihad last season but conceded 6. Spurs should have gone the same way.They played with intensity, were organised and all looked like they wanted to win. None of which was on display by United yesterday. If Spurs played like us they'd have lost by at least 4 nil.
That doesn't matter because Liverpool will also get 2 more titles.
And many of us defended us/ ETH last season even after such result/scoreline because we saw the positives/ right direction ETH had the time.We scored 3 goals at the Etihad last season but conceded 6. Spurs should have gone the same way.
Interesting.The charges relate to seasons up to 2018, we would get 2 and they would get 1 I think
Spurs were poor, City equally so.They played with intensity, were organised and all looked like they wanted to win. None of which was on display by United yesterday. If Spurs played like us they'd have lost by at least 4 nil.
We scored 3 goals at the Etihad last season but conceded 6. Spurs should have gone the same way.
Spurs could've easily been 5-1 down in the first half. City could've missed their chances vs us. I'm not seeing a team we should emulate defensively.Well we were talking about this season and this weekend.
However, we were never in that game last year and were 4-0 before we scored the first and 6-1 down before we got the last two late on. I'm not sure you can compare the two performances at all. There was no jeopardy in last year's match for City.
Spurs could've easily been 5-1 down in the first half. City could've missed their chances vs us. I'm not seeing a team we should emulate defensively.
Who's right?
Who's right?
The thing is total football may mean committing the defensive line into attacking phase to take risks gambling on trade off.Spurs could've easily been 5-1 down in the first half. City could've missed their chances vs us. I'm not seeing a team we should emulate defensively.
Not often I'd agree with Micah over Roy but I think he's right here. I don't think there's any way Ake gets up for that ball with his position relative to its height. Kulusevski simply has the momentum and the jump on him
Pep just refused to answer the question on the referee decision and then answered it anyway. As well as a weird comment about Mikel Arteta.
Maybe not but if he concentrateds on heading the ball he could well have put Kulusevski off enough that he doesn't score. As it was it came off his shoulder.
Ye I agree that the title doesn’t usually get talked about until after new year. Was just my opinion that I don’t think city are as good as last year. Last season they’d of beat Liverpool at home and put away the chances. They’d of beat spurs and they’d of beat Arsenal like they usually do. KDB is a huge player and a big miss but as they have the best quality squad in the league they wouldn’t miss him as say like we’d miss Bruno. They’ve got enough quality replacement across that team. Although it would be interesting to see how they’d cope say Haaland got injured. They’re also conceding much more goals. 4-4 with Chelsea and 3-3 with spurs.I don't disagree about other teams may make a better account of themselves. My point is only into New Year that usually when the title contenders start to pull away from the rest. A few points less at this stage of season from previous season doesn't say much about lower level. Liverpool got the exact same point they had right now after 14 games for same 2020 2021 season. They topped the table for the calendar year, and only fell off into mid table by the turn of new calendar year, before going on a title winning like run to finish 3rd place. PL was still considerably stronger than other leagues with 2 PL teams in the CL final (us in EL final).
Man City is missing KDB hard. Agree, they're in a littler transition phase of some position of the squad, and without KDB, they're suffering some minor issue.
He seemed to do it apologetically as if he didn't really believe it was handball. I guess that was why he went to the screen then, penalty had actually been given and so he had to go there to overturn it.
Messy end especially with Brighton not even getting a corner from it! I assume they'd have sent the keeper up so would've been an interesting one for Chelsea to defend.
His "if i speak" momentPep just refused to answer the question on the referee decision and then answered it anyway. As well as a weird comment about Mikel Arteta.
Absolutely outrageous.
Record 7th PGMOL apology incoming.
Never a penalty. Criminal refereeing, absolutely embarrassing.
I think more than just in attack (where Haaland seems to be letting City down with the chances he's missing), its the ability to see out games where the loss of experience in a Mahrez, KDB and Gundogan is really telling. They've been unable to now see out wins/draws vs Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool and Spurs with late goals conceded.
You're overrating Mahrez's impact last season. And they're not exactly starving for goals (scored 8 in the last 3 games), so while KDB walks into the side when fit, it's hard to say they miss his creativity too much.
I do agree with you that they miss Gundogan, but not for his goals. Gundogan (and Grealish to a lesser extent) were pivotal in City being able to retain possession and see out games.
Doku, Alvarez and Foden aren't patient players, willing to hold the ball to allow the team to set into position. They're looking to make something happen. B Silva alone can't overcome that dynamic. So what you see is a lot more turnovers and opportunities for the opposition to counter and transition.
And further back, Pep is trying to shoehorn Akanji into the Stones role in midfield and it's not working 100%. Rodri is great but he can't do it all, and his strength isn't running backwards trying to get back possession. City can't afford to drop Akanji from the midfield but they need Stones back ASAP.
I think the perfect starting 11 for City, with no injuries, looks like this:
HaalandPerfect mix of athleticism, ball retention, pausa and goal threat. Right now their balance is off and it's showing in goals conceded.
Grealish B Silva KDB. Foden
Stones Rodri
Ake/Gvardiol Dias. Walker
Ederson
Best case scenario, will be
Ederson - Walker, Dias, Gvaridol - Stones, Kovacic - Bernardo, Foden, Alvarez - Haaland and I'd worry about that team at Villa Park. Swapping Stones for Akanji and it gets very worrying.
If you only line up with 10 players you'll be in trouble for sure.
It feels like there two things going on, which are a bit connected.
IMO, the biggest is missing Stones. Akanji just can't step into midfield in the same way and he doesn't have the same comfort playing alongside Rodri as a pair.
And then the second is moving from a Grealish/Bernardo wing pairing to Doku/Foden in most matches. Its not really clear to me why Pep has opted for this change. Having a player like Doku definitely creates a different dimension in attack but City was such a smoothly oiled machine last spring. Its like Pep took what was one of the most dominant sides in recent history and pre-emptively decided to change it significantly before other teams figured out counterstrategies. Which could be a genius move or could be too clever by half.
Who's right?