acnumber9
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2006
- Messages
- 22,568
It looked close to offside for me.
You’re hard.
How’s that working out then ?City are dominating.
Not watching the game, listening to radio. 5live were going crazy. Said it was a definite penalty.
Of course. It’s what happens when you make your own luck obviously.So Sheffield have one ruled out for a big toe being offside, but Salah’s entire head which he used to score is fine?
I know what you mean but current rules (I think) doesn't look at intent but (1) if not hand/arm and (2) if arm made body shape larger.How was Alexander-Arnold supposed to get out the way of that?
Nah, VAR is only for teams like Sheffield Utd, Bournemouth etcWas that even checked for offside, or was it a casual glance by the VAR official?
Salahs knee was offside no?
because narrativeSky are really shit at showing replays. Looked offside but I guess we won't see it again.
Interesting what would happen if Pep don't win CL or PL this season.
Why no VAR there? I'm so confused.
a replay was shown, but not a VAR one with the lines
both goals posted@GifLord any chance of goals and incidents, pretty please
5 month title winning prosession from Scouse for us to endure.League done in November.
Looks that way doesn’t it.So its finally their year...
How was Alexander-Arnold supposed to get out the way of that?
Get Given £250m no doubt.
Yeah, the only question now is if they can get to 21 before Klopp finally fecks-offSo its finally their year...
both goals posted
What can you do when they aren't determined to help Liverpool.It was 100%. Goal looked offside, too. VAR said it wasn't though.
Lucky, lucky Liverpool.Wait, so Liverpool get an offside break and handball not given in the 1st half already? Come on now.
Sadly this confirms chances > possession. :/City are dominating.
The initial replay shows his knee was off to me. Every other decision like that sky show about 10 replays of it. Laughable.