mu4c_20le
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2013
- Messages
- 46,746
Because the things he did well, Fred used to do week in week out.Why? He actually played well today.
We need the players Chelsea replaced him with, rather than sign their dead weight.
Because the things he did well, Fred used to do week in week out.Why? He actually played well today.
We looked way more competent today. some better decision making in our build up play and we’d have cruised to victory. The usual suspects making bad decisions on the ball and attacks just falling apart really don’t help matters. Still we looked generally secure and worth the win. It’s a step in the right direction.
Yes we are still actively protesting to oust the glazers from time to time. Yet in this case they gave this dud money, nearly 350 mil. You give this guy city or liverpool he will still struggle against luton and Southampton but yet we had history of winning with glazers. This guy must go, and if its before the glazers, so be it.Maybe not so let's bring in another manager and keep the Glazers, right?
Because the things he did well, Fred used to do week in week out.
We need the players Chelsea replaced him with, rather than sign their dead weight.
I know. It's hilarious that we've managed to downgrade from Fred but we found a way.Laughable comparison.
Like who? Lavia has hardly played, Caicedo has been as bland as Mount for us and Ogechukwu has been average. Gallagher too has basically been their mctominay.....Because the things he did well, Fred used to do week in week out.
We need the players Chelsea replaced him with, rather than sign their dead weight.
He created the best chance we had in the second half
They are natural midfielders, Caicedo is an actual 8. I have no doubt he would've been a better fit, no idea why we didn't go for him after calling chelseas bluff.Like who? Lavia has hardly played, Caicedo has been as bland as Mount for us and Ogechukwu has been average. Gallagher too has basically been their mctominay.....
They are natural midfielders, Caicedo is an actual 8. I have no doubt he would've been a better fit, no idea why we didn't go for him after calling chelseas bluff.
Because he cost £120m
Nah, can't be that.
Jeez - how do you think chances are created? He passed it perfectly, what more do you want?he didn’t create the chance. The ball came to him an he made a pass, barely
I know. It's hilarious that we've managed to downgrade from Fred but we found a way.
It's actually impressive how bad it is considering where we are in the table.Our goal difference
Seriously what games have you been watching .Højlund didn't get good contact on his early shot, Rashford struck his straight at the keeper, couple other tame shots. The team overall is playing fine, it's just our finishing that needs a massive improvement. It would have been 3 or 4 nil with slightly better finishing.
You got me. Nice one. Put it up on the scoreboard. I'll recap it for you: our performance would not seem so labored and pedestrian if we could finish. If we were just a tad better at finishing, it would have been 3 or 4 to 0, in which case people wouldn't be complaining so much. We completely contained Luton. It wasn't sexy but it was functional.Seriously what games have you been watching .
Fair enough but being functional against team like Luton at home isn't playing fine however you slice it and if it was one of the game then it's still excusable but not when we have been poor in almost all of our games this season .You got me. Nice one. Put it up on the scoreboard. I'll recap it for you: our performance would not seem so labored and pedestrian if we could finish. If we were just a tad better at finishing, it would have been 3 or 4 to 0, in which case people wouldn't be complaining so much. We completely contained Luton. It wasn't sexy but it was functional.
A real flair for pointing out the obvious…Fair enough but being functional against team like Luton at home isn't playing fine however you slice it and if it was one of the game then it's still excusable but not when we have been poor in almost all of our games this season .
I agreeYou got me. Nice one. Put it up on the scoreboard. I'll recap it for you: our performance would not seem so labored and pedestrian if we could finish. If we were just a tad better at finishing, it would have been 3 or 4 to 0, in which case people wouldn't be complaining so much. We completely contained Luton. It wasn't sexy but it was functional.
I think people need to look at Lutons recent results, they have only lost by one goal once in the last 8 or so games.
Lost by one goal to West Ham, to Spurs, took at point of Forest and Liverpool.
They are not the whipping boys some people seem to think they are.
We won comfortably yesterday with no real alarms, there really isn't a down side to it at all apart from the slight lack of ruthlessness up top.
I think people need to look at Lutons recent results, they have only lost by one goal once in the last 8 or so games.
Lost by one goal to West Ham, to Spurs, took at point of Forest and Liverpool.
They are not the whipping boys some people seem to think they are.
We won comfortably yesterday with no real alarms, there really isn't a down side to it at all apart from the slight lack of ruthlessness up top.
It’s a real mystery that oneBecause he cost £120m
Hence the reason I said recent results, other than Aston Villa their recent results home and away have been very tight affairs.They are extremely poor. They would have lost 5-0 if they played at Anfield. Also, they played at home against Spurs, and Spurs were a man down for half the game. When they have played away against better teams, they have been battered (3-0 Chelsea, 4-1 Brighton).
Hence the reason I said recent results, other than Aston Villa their recent results home and away have been very tight affairs.
As for saying Liverpool would win 5-0 at Anfield, that hasn't happened so is just pure conjecture and grasping at straws to enable you to make your point.
They haven't played Liverpool at Anfield yet so to use the future hyperthetical is a non starter as a base for any argument.Maybe because they haven't played anyone decent. So weird to compare home results vs away results too, a big, big difference, especially for teams like Luton. They will get totally battered against Liverpool away and you can quote me on that. It's just excuses here. We played okeyish but should obviously win by two, or three goals. Luton is very poor, and they were poor again yesterday.
Graham Scott