[Poll] We desperately need a striker

Which striker should we buy ?


  • Total voters
    1,144
  • Poll closed .
I dont really see why Mata couldn't be a false number 9. Likewise Januzaj. Obviously finishing wont be their biggest asset but you would assume that with most strikers who would be willing to play beneath Rooney.

Keep an eye out on Kane until January. We could get him & he still wont be cup tied either
 
Cavani, would be perfect if we could get him for a decent price, built for the PL, can play up top or wide forward, great workrate, good feet,very strong in the air and an excellent scoring record. I suspect the people on here who slag him off haven't actually watched him that much.
 
I dont really see why Mata couldn't be a false number 9. Likewise Januzaj.

Van Gaal doesn't employ false nines though, even as the occasional novelty. It's very unlikely, if not downright impossible to start anything but traditional strikers under Van Gaal.
 
Not any more he wasn't agreed but that is besides the point, we have always had 2 strikers of top quality whenever we have done well.. to get in a lesser striker just so Rooney can swan around unchallenged is a ridiculous proposition.. relying on Rooney is a massive gamble especially as it seems as if he isn't as good as he once was.

Gamble bordering on stupidity. As happy as I am with our midfield now, the attack still looks very blunt, especially if di Maria is about the leave. There aren't nearly enough goals in any of the options we have to play in attack.

Depay - Young, would need time to adjust
Young - Not a prolific goal scorer
di Maria - Same
Mata - has scored more than 10 only twice in 9 top league seasons.
Rooney - Hasn't scored 20 in a while.
Januzaj & Wilson - Too young.

We need goal scorers. One striker, and preferably another from the wide areas.
 
Last edited:
Van Gaal doesn't employ false nines though, even as the occasional novelty. It's very unlikely, if not downright impossible to start anything but traditional strikers under Van Gaal.

I get that and i know in thr past this was true. However, ever sinse guardiola had the job at barcelona; i think he has accustomed to te fact that a false 9 can work although it may not be the way he primarily wants to operate.

Thats why i think the 352 was so important because that had a further forward attacking midfielder behind players like RVP & Robben; with the latter still operating as a wide forward.

This doesn't matter though because we are probably looking at the 3rd/4th striking options.
 
Gamble bordering on stupidity. As happy as I am with our midfield now, the attack still looks very blunt, especially if di Maria is about the leave. There aren't nearly enough goals in any of the options we have to play in attack.

Depay - Young, would need time to adjust
Young - Not a prolific goal scorer
di Maria - Same
Mata - has he scored more than 10 only twice in the 9 top league seasons.
Rooney - Hasn't scored 20 in a while.
Januzaj & Wilson - Too young.

We need goal scorers. One striker, and preferably another from the wide areas.
I'd say we only need another winger if Di Maria leaves, as for the striker, it would have to be one happy playing second fiddle to Rooney.
 
I'd say we only need another winger if Di Maria leaves, as for the striker, it would have to be one happy playing second fiddle to Rooney.

Right, I don't see another wide player coming if di Maria stays.

Or Rooney will have to adjust playing second fiddle to the new striker. Neither Rooney or us should assume that he is undroppable. Healthy competition is always welcome. Like others have a said already, we managed to keep 4 strikers happy, when we only played two.
 
Even if we do end up with Bale we still need another proven striker. We'd be foolish to go into a season were hoping to challenge on all fronts for with just Rooney and young James. Imagine if Rooney broke something and we had to wait until January - we'd be dead in the water league wise by then and every club would hold us to ransom for even the most average of strikers.
 
I reckon we are definately getting Bale and Kane in at some stage.I think it's likely to be next season though.
 
I reckon we are definately getting Bale and Kane in at some stage.I think it's likely to be next season though.

I think one will be next season probably january. The other i hope we get this season as that would help us alot.

The thing people dont know about van gaal js that he us actually very pro-culture with regards to the club he manages. Managing united and having a world class welsh winger not at the club wont sit right with him; same goes with kane.
 
We do love to overrate our youngsters don't we?

Wilson has done nothing of merit to be considered at par with a proven EPL scorer like Berahino

Not overrating Wilson,not claiming he's as good as Berahino either, but he is really fast and still young just like Berahino,we might as well give him more game time, he would definitely be a second choice striker at the very least in one of the lower ranked EPL sides.

Sometimes the difference between 2 players is the number of games they play, Kane got his opportunity by chance and look at how that turned out.
 
Last edited:
Ronaldo would be more likely then Bale I think. Bale isn't making the right noises and Perez doesn't want people to know what a knob he is. As for overrating our youngsters - we've had talented kids but we've been challenging for trophies and so it's been hard to dislodge them. It's difficult to put someone worth 10 million + on the bench for a kid. Wilson (with the right service AND if LVG let's him play his natural game) will be fine. I think Benteke would suit because he would score 15-20 goals a season I think IF the service is good.
 
Depay scored many goals last season - but in the Dutch league. The EPL is a totally different level.
Falcao and Di Maria were sensational in Spain. In EPL, they were not.
Even LVG admitted last year that he was taken aback by the competitiveness of the EPL (we got beat by MK Dons and Leicester - these were games he thought we could win easily).

I see your point. Nonetheless, it rubbishes Mainoldo's claim that we don't have a winger who can score goals when we bought one who just scored more goals than every striker in the PL bar Aguero. If he scores half as many next season it will still be the sort of number we need from him.
 
We do love to overrate our youngsters don't we?

Wilson has done nothing of merit to be considered at par with a proven EPL scorer like Berahino

No, but if you actually watch them play, there's no obvious disparity in quality. This attitude is why young English players never get anywhere at the big clubs. Of course Wilson hasn't 'done anything' to compare to what Berahino has done, he hasn't been given the opportunity. Until he gets that opportunity, he will never have 'done' anything. Before this season (and to some extent the last) Harry Kane hadn't 'done' anything comparable to strikers who were playing regularly in the Premier League. Then he got his chance and oh, all of a sudden he has 'done' something.

Is it worth £25m for Berahino to mostly sit on the bench instead of the other? Only if we really have become Madrid MkII.
 
Not overrating Wilson,not claiming he's as good as Berahino either, but he is really fast and still young just like Berahino,we might as well give him more game time, he would definitely be a second choice striker at the very least in one of the lower ranked EPL sides.

Sometimes the difference between 2 players is the number of games they play, Kane got his opportunity by chance and look at how that turned out.

Thats fair and i agree. However he wont be given a regular run at a top club. Barely no one gets that anymore. Berardi had been scoring hattricks against top sides and juve hasnt yet recalled him. Experience is as important as talent

Wilson needs a 1 yr loan in another epl club
 
We should be going with a striker who a) is young enough to be benched, assuming Rooney is preferred choice for lone striker in a 4-3-3, and b) complements Rooney if we switch to a system with two strikers, or c) they have to be an even bigger name than Rooney.

Don't think Cavani fits any of those criteria. Neither does Higuain, and both are massively overrated and overpriced. It would be better to spend on the potential of Lacazette or Kane. Outside of those two there are no obvious options, assuming Bayern aren't willing to sell Muller or Lewandowski.

Berahino, Benteke and Lukaku would all be decent-ish if money was no object. Of the three Berahino is by far the best value for money since the other two are less prolific and would both cost more than £30m.
 
No, but if you actually watch them play, there's no obvious disparity in quality. This attitude is why young English players never get anywhere at the big clubs. Of course Wilson hasn't 'done anything' to compare to what Berahino has done, he hasn't been given the opportunity. Until he gets that opportunity, he will never have 'done' anything. Before this season (and to some extent the last) Harry Kane hadn't 'done' anything comparable to strikers who were playing regularly in the Premier League. Then he got his chance and oh, all of a sudden he has 'done' something.

Is it worth £25m for Berahino to mostly sit on the bench instead of the other? Only if we really have become Madrid MkII.
I'd love to believe that Willo takes his chances this season but I don't think he's ready to be our 2nd striker, he's also prone to injuries.. I think fighting with someone like Berahino for the second striker wouldn't be bad for him though.. I think we could get Berahino for less
 
Thats fair and i agree. However he wont be given a regular run at a top club. Barely no one gets that anymore. Berardi had been scoring hattricks against top sides and juve hasnt yet recalled him. Experience is as important as talent

Wilson needs a 1 yr loan in another epl club

Wilson doesn't necessarily need a loan move, he needs more game time and with United competing for 4 trophies this season with him as our 3rd option in that position, he might just get that this season.....we are really bad at loan moves, besides Wilson and Mcnair seem to be LVG's main youth projects and Januzaj to an extent.
 
We should be going with a striker who a) is young enough to be benched, assuming Rooney is preferred choice for lone striker in a 4-3-3, and b) complements Rooney if we switch to a system with two strikers, or c) they have to be an even bigger name than Rooney.

Don't think Cavani fits any of those criteria. Neither does Higuain, and both are massively overrated and overpriced. It would be better to spend on the potential of Lacazette or Kane. Outside of those two there are no obvious options, assuming Bayern aren't willing to sell Muller or Lewandowski.

Berahino, Benteke and Lukaku would all be decent-ish if money was no object. Of the three Berahino is by far the best value for money since the other two are less prolific and would both cost more than £30m.

If you're wanting to be realistic and accurate (which your post seems to be aiming at) in discussing options, then you should also take it as given that Spurs won't be selling Kane. My advice would thus be to exclude him from your whittled-down short-list.
 
If you're wanting to be realistic and accurate (which your post seems to be aiming at) in discussing options, then you should also take it as given that Spurs won't be selling Kane. My advice would thus be to exclude him from your whittled-down short-list.
It's fine. He'll be happy to leave when he realises Spurs wont achieve much more than Europa league qualification.
 
If you're wanting to be realistic and accurate (which your post seems to be aiming at) in discussing options, then you should also take it as given that Spurs won't be selling Kane. My advice would thus be to exclude him from your whittled-down short-list.

I think £50m or so would certainly have Levy thinking. For a youngster who had one purple patch? Be mad to turn it down from a business perspective, and that's the only perspective he knows.

£50m would be a ridiculous fee for any club to spend on someone with only 35 Prem appearances, a third as many as Sterling, but just making the point that it would be better spent on him than Cavani or Higuain.
 
I'd love to believe that Willo takes his chances this season but I don't think he's ready to be our 2nd striker, he's also prone to injuries.. I think fighting with someone like Berahino for the second striker wouldn't be bad for him though.. I think we could get Berahino for less

In what way would that not be bad for him? He doesn't need competition - he'd already be second choice behind Rooney and have Hernandez for company. What he needs is games, and throwing another young striker into the mix would limit his even further.

And I highly doubt we'd get Berahino for less. West Brom are rumoured to be unwilling to sell for less than £30m, so £25m seems pretty a pretty realistic target price. A total waste when he's really no more talented than Wilson (and with, in my opinion, a significantly lower ceiling.)
 
We do love to overrate our youngsters don't we?

Wilson has done nothing of merit to be considered at par with a proven EPL scorer like Berahino
And you seem to like underating them. Especially if they are British.
 
I dont really see why Mata couldn't be a false number 9. Likewise Januzaj. Obviously finishing wont be their biggest asset but you would assume that with most strikers who would be willing to play beneath Rooney.

Keep an eye out on Kane until January. We could get him & he still wont be cup tied either

How many players have successfully pulled off the false 9 role? Totti, Rooney and Messi are the only ones I can really think of. Maybe Fabregas for a short time at Barca. It seems to me like a very very difficult position to get right, I don't think it's nearly as simple as playing a CAM or winger upfront. Bale, Hazard, Silva, Sterling and Gotze (I'm less sure about him) are examples imcan think of where it didn't really work.
 
In what way would that not be bad for him? He doesn't need competition - he'd already be second choice behind Rooney and have Hernandez for company. What he needs is games, and throwing another young striker into the mix would limit his even further.

And I highly doubt we'd get Berahino for less. West Brom are rumoured to be unwilling to sell for less than £30m, so £25m seems pretty a pretty realistic target price. A total waste when he's really no more talented than Wilson (and with, in my opinion, a significantly lower ceiling.)

I don't think Berahino would be a good choice but I also think Hernandez will be sold and there's no way we can risk going into the season with Wilson as our only other #9 after Rooney.
 
In what way would that not be bad for him? He doesn't need competition - he'd already be second choice behind Rooney and have Hernandez for company. What he needs is games, and throwing another young striker into the mix would limit his even further.

And I highly doubt we'd get Berahino for less. West Brom are rumoured to be unwilling to sell for less than £30m, so £25m seems pretty a pretty realistic target price. A total waste when he's really no more talented than Wilson (and with, in my opinion, a significantly lower ceiling.)
Hernandez is as good as gone so we will need a striker, Wilson's not good enough to be no2 striker, we will be in the market for someone and Benteke or Berahino seems like players who are realistic atm..
 
And you seem to like underating them. Especially if they are British.

Do I? I believe that Beckham was the finest crosser of the time the world have ever seen, Scholes was the best midfielder of his era, Gaz turned up to be a decent full back and Giggs was unstoppable when on form. About the rest well you only have to notice the achievements they achieved after leaving United (Oshea, Fabio the new Cafu Da Silva etc). Its so easy to look good when you're a tiny meaningless cog in an unstoppable machine. Things get more complicated when you're actually have to contribute for the magic to created
 
Wilson doesn't necessarily need a loan move, he needs more game time and with United competing for 4 trophies this season with him as our 3rd option in that position, he might just get that this season.....we are really bad at loan moves, besides Wilson and Mcnair seem to be LVG's main youth projects and Januzaj to an extent.

I believe it would be very difficult for a young striker to develop at United considering the pressure, the amount of games we can give them and how teams tend to play against us (ie parking the bus). Id say lets sign a young quality striker keep Hernandez and send Wilson on loan for a year or two. By the time Rooney is too old to do the job we would have two quality strikers ready to take his place
 
Probably been said many times but if I was LVG I would be in for a versatile forward who can play anywhere in the 3 of a Neymar/Messi/Suarez style 433. At the moment our equivalent is ADM/Rooney/Depay. That way we can get a quality player who doesn't need to resign themselves to playing second fiddle to Rooney.
 
I believe it would be very difficult for a young striker to develop at United considering the pressure, the amount of games we can give them and how teams tend to play against us (ie parking the bus). Id say lets sign a young quality striker keep Hernandez and send Wilson on loan for a year or two. By the time Rooney is too old to do the job we would have two quality strikers ready to take his place

We obviously dont want a young striker(not named Harry Kane) and we dont need one, there's no point signing a player like Berahino who isn't good enough to start for us, we have Wilson and we let go of Henriquez which suggests our new striker will have some sort of experience with Hernandez on his way out.

Loan moves dont always work out for strikers, you also have to incorporate the strikers into your team after a successful loan spell and that might take another season or 2, Wilson needs to remain with the first team and feature in certain games to improve, he has already impressed in the few games he has played for us and his goal against QPR proves he is a special player.

We need a striker who is good enough to challenge Rooney and also good enough to make an impact from the bench without commanding a starting place....someone like Remy.
 
We aren't desperate.

Assuming our centrebacks consists of 2 out of Rojo/Evans/Smalling/Jones/McNair/New CB(do we really need one?) and fullbacks Valencia/Darmian/Rafael and Blind/Shaw.

Midfielders would number 3 in the form of Carrick/Schweinsteiger/Schneiderlin/ Herrera/Di Maria/Young/Fellaini/Pereira.

We are left with 3 forward positions that can be filled by Mata/Rooney/Wilson/Chicharito/Depay/Januzaj/DiMaria/Young.

We aren't exactly desperate for a striker though I think a new one is good to have.
 
I don't think we are going to buy a out and out striker, instead another forward....Bale, Reus, Griezmann and Muller are some options

Rooney, Wilson, and yes, Fellaini can play the central striking role, and so can Muller if we get him..
 
We obviously dont want a young striker(not named Harry Kane) and we dont need one, there's no point signing a player like Berahino who isn't good enough to start for us, we have Wilson and we let go of Henriquez which suggests our new striker will have some sort of experience with Hernandez on his way out.

Loan moves dont always work out for strikers, you also have to incorporate the strikers into your team after a successful loan spell and that might take another season or 2, Wilson needs to remain with the first team and feature in certain games to improve, he has already impressed in the few games he has played for us and his goal against QPR proves he is a special player.

We need a striker who is good enough to challenge Rooney and also good enough to make an impact from the bench without commanding a starting place....someone like Remy.

I disagree. We need someone who is willing to accept the bench but good enough to take Rooney's role when needed. Someone who adds something different to Rooney like for example pace. Rooney is still a great striker but he's in decline so you want someone who will improve year after year to counter that That's something a young proven striker can do.
 
We aren't desperate.

Assuming our centrebacks consists of 2 out of Rojo/Evans/Smalling/Jones/McNair/New CB(do we really need one?) and fullbacks Valencia/Darmian/Rafael and Blind/Shaw.

Midfielders would number 3 in the form of Carrick/Schweinsteiger/Schneiderlin/ Herrera/Di Maria/Young/Fellaini/Pereira.

We are left with 3 forward positions that can be filled by Mata/Rooney/Wilson/Chicharito/Depay/Januzaj/DiMaria/Young.

We aren't exactly desperate for a striker though I think a new one is good to have.

erm dude, if Chicharito leaves. United are left with Wilson and Rooney who are natural strikers. If Rooney get injured then Wilson has to cover and quite frankly he's not ready for that responsibility just yet. You forget that the schedule books has widen now due to UCL is now back in, so rotation is a must and Rooney cant play every game. United are desperate for a ready made striker. Especially one that can make an impact, as United's last season goal ratio was below average.