Organic Potatoes
Full Member
Games prices have lagged behind inflation for a long time, I don’t know if you can say they’re too expensive now.They better not increase the price. They are already insanely expensive.
Games prices have lagged behind inflation for a long time, I don’t know if you can say they’re too expensive now.They better not increase the price. They are already insanely expensive.
Wait PS5 is going to be 825GB or 2TB? I realise their drive is the star of the show and likely to be expensive but that is going to fill up seriously quickly and I’m guessing any expansion drives are going to be via USB and not take advantage of bus speeds the internal drive has access to?
I don't even wanna think about it and get hype as the disappointment will crush me.I would kill - KILL - for a new Dead Space game. I would just love a remaster of the first two, to be honest.
it's highly likely they'll use USB-C instead of USB-A this time which allows for much faster speeds, so external SSD's could be plugged in if people want to. I wouldn't be surprised if Sony release their own ones and slap a big price tag on 'em.
Be interesting for sure, 825gb really isn't enough assuming games are 100gb+. They'll need to find some workaround.
PS5 won’t take any old expansion drive unless you wanna play PS4 games. You’d need to buy M.2 SSDs. The ones that pass certification from Sony that is and these probably cost more than £100.
It will take USB-C drives which will be used to store the games you are not playing. 825GB, maybe ~600 minus the fluff should be enough for 5+ games. How many games do you play at one time?
Any time you want to copy another game in to play it, it'll be copying to a super fast SSD so it won't be a long wait. Go make a drink or snack.... and voila.
Why?Midway through the generation I expect games will be 300-400GB.
Why?
But games designed for SSD no longer need to have multiple copies of assets. I guess it depends on how complex games end up becoming but current game sizes are the way they are due to duplication, expansions, and patching, among other things...
I mean I can see games being more than 100Gb sure.... but 300+? Not so sure...
I feel like Sony have put a degree of thought into it, but we'll see...
Cerny Road to PS5 or whatever it's called. They explain that there are multiple copies of assets in different areas of the disk (in Spiderman for example) to decrease the seek times of HDD (dependent on where you are on the disk) whereas on a SSD seek times are uniform so you only need the one copy. He obviously explains it better....Wait, people think game sizes will get smaller just because of SSD drives? What do you mean by "no longer need to have multiple copies of assets"?
Not pulling you up mate, I'm just curious what that means and where it has come from.
Cerny Road to PS5 or whatever it's called. They explain that there are multiple copies of assets in different areas of the disk (in Spiderman for example) to decrease the seek times of HDD (dependent on where you are on the disk) whereas on a SSD seek times are uniform so you only need the one copy. He obviously explains it better....
Yeah, Epic have talked about the multiple copies of assets and it was mentioned by Linus Tech Tips as well. They all said it was something developers are looking forwards to as a major improvement in next gen as they have got used to bloating the size of download due to repeating assets all across the disk to get around the slow read times on mechanical hard drives.
I reckon that will probably just equalise against having 4k assets but it sounds like there won't be a big increase in space taken in next-gen though from what they were saying.
At least 200 GB I'd say. Hopefully not 300GB. What did they start off at this gen?Midway through the generation I expect games will be 300-400GB.
Can you explain what you mean because that doesn't sound like what Cerny is saying. He's having there are multiple copies of assets it most games to enable faster seek timesAhh, we are talking about the various makeshift cache techniques as one. I haven't seen him specifically talk about it, but I'm guessing the talk of extra copies of assets was how to easily explain it and basically say they won't need to reserve any extra space than they need. That's true, though games aren't going to get drastically smaller. They just won't be getting drastically bigger like this gen either, hence why the trade off is similar sized storage drives.
Developers have gotten increasingly lazy this gen with techniques and game sizes out of control. The buzz around not having to think about it anymore (at least on PS5) is more down to relief at not having to. Which is a good thing
Epic are the worst for un-optimised file sizes and ridiculous updates. But yeah, as above, they won't need to reserve as much of the SSD.
Watch Mark Cernys presentation. That's exactly what he's saying. There are multiple copies of assets in most games to pull that info faster from the HDDWait, people think game sizes will get smaller just because of SSD drives? What do you mean by "no longer need to have multiple copies of assets"?
Not pulling you up mate, I'm just curious what that means and where it has come from.
Cerny Road to PS5 or whatever it's called. They explain that there are multiple copies of assets in different areas of the disk (in Spiderman for example) to decrease the seek times of HDD (dependent on where you are on the disk) whereas on a SSD seek times are uniform so you only need the one copy. He obviously explains it better....
Its more the other assets in the game that are frequently used for example same type of textures, same type of trees, same type of houses etc etc. With HDD, you would have to duplicate those assets and pack them along with other assets you can see in a location in the game so that they can be read sequentially without having to perform too many seeks to get those assets from different physical locations in the HDD.Isn't it when you see a character model it is loaded from that levels part of the HDD , whereas now if you see a character model anywhere in game it will be pulled from one copy of it on an SSD? So instead of having 30 copies of it on a HDD it is now only 1? That's how I understood it.
PS5 won’t take any old expansion drive unless you wanna play PS4 games. You’d need to buy M.2 SSDs. The ones that pass certification from Sony that is and these probably cost more than £100.
Ummm.... Here you go:Isn't it when you see a character model it is loaded from that levels part of the HDD , whereas now if you see a character model anywhere in game it will be pulled from one copy of it on an SSD? So instead of having 30 copies of it on a HDD it is now only 1? That's how I understood it.
Its more the other assets in the game that are frequently used for example same type of textures, same type of trees, same type of houses etc etc. With HDD, you would have to duplicate those assets and pack them along with other assets you can see in a location in the game so that they can be read sequentially without having to perform too many seeks to get those assets from different physical locations in the HDD.
Its more the other assets in the game that are frequently used for example same type of textures, same type of trees, same type of houses etc etc. With HDD, you would have to duplicate those assets and pack them along with other assets you can see in a location in the game so that they can be read sequentially without having to perform too many seeks to get those assets from different physical locations in the HDD.
Any chance the leaked photos that have come out today are real? Or just more rubbish?
But games designed for SSD no longer need to have multiple copies of assets. I guess it depends on how complex games end up becoming but current game sizes are the way they are due to duplication, expansions, and patching, among other things...
I mean I can see games being more than 100Gb sure.... but 300+? Not so sure...
I feel like Sony have put a degree of thought into it, but we'll see...
Surely not?! It’s out in a few months!Event is software only I think so I don't expect they will show PS5.
The event is over an hour long and the PS5 is about to go into production. I'm sure they'll show the design soon before one of the factory workers leak it.Event is software only I think so I don't expect they will show PS5.
Any chance the leaked photos that have come out today are real? Or just more rubbish?
Well... are you back yet?
If not tonight I think we'll see it very soon. The event tonight is over an hour long so I can't see it being software only, but then if they do reveal the PS5 that might take the limelight over the games themselves. They'll have to reveal it soon before someone in the factories does.We getting a look at the console tonight or is it just software?