markhughes
Full Member
Zidane - Good player but not as good as people make out.
Kane - See above
Kane - See above
In terms of PL careers they’re not close at all.
We got “way better” without Keane? I know this is a thread of opinions but that’s a pretty nonsense one! We won a treble with Keane as our captain and the double twice!
RvN I can go along with. I don’t agree but I can see the argument
You say false...then say Ronaldo was obviously the better player?
Ronaldo won 3 leagues, 1 FA Cup, 2 league cups and 1 CL. How was Henry’s career better? It was just longer.
From historical players I think Keane and Ruud are the most overrated. The fact we got way better without them says a lot.
They both have great stats, but for the overall team they are not amazing.
For me Carrick is way better than Keane and the results show that as well.
Tevez and Rooney for all the flaws better than Ruud.
I also think Cantona is overhyped, but he did lift the club a bit like Bruno. Thus you can understand he gets overrated.
Same people say that Shearer was better than Rooney for England and in the Premier League so I came to the conclusion that we shouldn't take very seriously everything that is written in the internet.Also keep in mind that we are the most hated club in Europe.Henry. He was obviously a unbelievable player, but people talk about him as the best premier league player ever and that’s just ridiculous to me.
Are you mad? These myths were debunked well before he retired.Carrick, great interceptor and decent passer, but just couldn’t handle tempo or pace at all.
Either in terms of teams playing at a high passing tempo or quick players running against him. The game just passed him buy. And always slowed down the tempo when we were in possession.
Agree on this one. Excellent two seasons and now remembered as possibly the best PL player ever? No chance in hell.Henry. He was obviously a unbelievable player, but people talk about him as the best premier league player ever and that’s just ridiculous to me.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/amp/football/39723573I'm sure its nobody or only the minority.
I believe the peak of their Premier League careers was almost identical in terms of statistical output. I think @roonster09 post the stats a while back.
it was @Chipper
Going to do the obligatory Shearer comparison as they're often named as the best two strikers, or forwards if you'd rather call Henry that instead, in PL history. In some of Shearer's there were more teams in league so more games:
Shearer
1992/93 - 20 (21 apps)
1993/94 - 35 (40)
1994/95 - 47 (42)
1995/96 - 38 (35)
1996/97 - 32 (31)
Totals: 172 in 169, 1.02 per game
Henry
2001-02 - 29 goals + assists (33 apps)
2002-03 - 44 (37)
2003-04 - 36 (37)
2004-05 - 39 (32)
2005-06 - 35 (32)
Totals: 183 in 171, 1.07 per game
Henry just edging it there, and of course he was seen has having a better all round game by nearly everyone as he was better at making goals than Shearer ever was. Still quite close on those combined stats.
Another purely goalscoring comparison that I once came up between the two was that Henry was born on August 17th and turned 22 the same month he signed for Arsenal at the start of 1999/00. In 8 seasons at Arsenal he scored 174 in 254 in the league, 0.69 a game. Shearer was born on August 13th, and if you take the 8 seasons from when he was 22 you get 176 goals in 253, 0.70 per game. It's remarkably similar.
Messi rarely impacts the biggest games these daysI think Messi is still probably the best player in the world right now, but I’d have Neymar as second. Just a couple of months ago I thought Neymar was maybe number one but Messi has been in superb form recently
Ronaldinho, going by this thread. Seriously, highest peak of all time???? Seriously
Cannavaro
Nedved
This being a united board, Paul Scholes
Hazard
I'm borderline on Iniesta
Messi rarely impacts the biggest games these days
Neymar almost always does
Maybe it's barcelona's fault, but while i agree that on a day to day basis Messi is still better, ultimately the CL is the biggest competition of all and should have a bigger impact when assessing these comparisons. And Neymar beats Messi there, for the second year in a row
Not so sure it's much better, but one can only judge based on what happens, not what might be. It's fine margins, i'll give you thatPSG have a much better team at the moment
True, but one can only judge based on what happens, not what might be. It's fine margins, i'll give you that
Might as well get in on the act;
Ricardo Carvalho - class player, incredibly elegant but people have elevated him to a level where it almost sounds like Terry was hanging on to his coattails in that defence. They complimented each other perfectly, but I rate Terry much, much higher.
David Silva - another incredibly elegant classy player who is spoken about as if he belongs at the upper echelons of Premier League midfielders when he's at least the very least a tier below, maybe more.
Didier Drogba - I have come to this painful realisation in recent years. I used to have him right up there next to Henry and Shearer as one of the all-time great strikers in this league. He's still wildly important to me and his record on the all the big occasions will speak for itself, but I have reluctantly lowered his all-time status neck and neck with Henry and Shearer to having an internal debate about whether he can scrape into the top 5.
There is one more, but I'd rather not feel the wrath of this forum.
A lot of this thread is just gonna be about how mad you are for not thinking Eto'o was brilliant.
He was class under Rikjaard before Messi was established and Iniesta was a youth player. He was class when they had Marquez in midfield. scored 25 and 26 league goals before Pep got there and was 3rd in world player of the year voting. Even won champions league top assister in 2006!Well I should of gave a explanation. He was a very good player rated him everywhere but he got classed as one of the best at Barca during a time when they had the best midfield trio ever, Messi in his Prime and the best manager at the time. I still rated him highly but never thought he was world class, might be a minority opinion but it’s how I felt
He knows a great midfielder when he sees one.That's because Pep loves sideways passers.
agree with all of these. Maybe Bruno is an elite scoring/assisting midfielder but has deficiencies with other aspects of his gameBruno. I think he’s a good player, but he isn’t top tier/elite. I think his current standing is a combination of stats (with no small helping of penalties) and just a general narrative that has swept on that he’s our saviour. I see some similarities with my next player:
Javier Hernandez - when he was here, in that there was an effort to create a narrative that he was a South American superstar striker that all our rivals should be envious of. There was also this narrative that, if you hold him up under a certain light and look from a certain angle - he was absolutely rapid (fastest speed in a World Cup apparently) - but he was never a Walcott/Rashford speedster either. Was clear that he was good in the box, but not an elite, world class striker. I feel that the club played a big part in this. He was a snip at £6m during our value in the market days, and I felt at the time that there was a concerted effort to repackage him as something he wasn’t in order to pull the wool over the fans eyes and create a budget icon.
Aubameyang - never impresses me. I can’t prove that he’s shit though because he has great stats. Usually.
Firmino - I think my views on him are well documented on here. He’s out of his depth and a con-artist.
Henderson - right place at the right time player. But nothing special.
McTominay - narrative amongst some sections of fans and media that he’s too class, Keane reborn. Not for me, average player, although a useful one.
He knows a great midfielder when he sees one.
Look at all these sideways and backwards passes.
If anyone thinks Carrick was better than Keane then they're either massively overrating Carrick or massively underrating Keane.
Would agree with the VDS shout, to an extent. He was generally an excellent keeper and is rightly seen as such. However, you sometimes see posters say things like "he never made mistakes and was always so assured", which just isn't true. He made his share of mistakes for us but they get forgotten when you're in an excellent side that can bail you out when they do happen. He also could/should have done better for goals in all three CL finals he played for us and made another high-profile error in the 1996 CL final with Ajax. Add in a slew of other errors that saw him depart Juve for Fulham (including a crucial error against Lazio that ultimately cost Juve the title). All of which is sometimes ignored by United fans when assessing him as a goalkeeper.