Phil Jones Future | Reports: Observing United academy sessions

Status
Not open for further replies.
All the outrage even though you have no idea what wage he is on. Doesn't it make you look incredibly stupid if he is actually on 50k/week? If Phil Jones is on such a low wage, then I don't see any down side to this. At the moment, we need him. Smalling just came back from injury, Bailly is far from reliable and he's gonna need time if he ever comes good. The only case we don't need Phil Jones is we sign a world class defender and he hits the ground running immediately. We know too well that it's far from guaranted, and if he fails, we will need Jones again. Best case scenario, the new signing performs well, I have no doubt we can easily find a new club to sell Jones to.
At the moment we need him yeah but how does that translate into a 4+1 extension ?
 
It tickles me how many fans are getting so bent out of shape just because a good solid pro with 8 years experience at the club, and still with scope to develop into the player we all thought/hoped we were signing when the club, and several people at the club obviously think it's the right thing to do, and we obviously can afford it, so what's the problem ? He's one player in a 25 man squad ffs

And no doubt it'll be the same crowd who will be the first to jump on the first mistake any new defender that comes in makes, ie. scores an own-goal, or gives away a penalty, or both, and will write him off as not good enough, or too expensive, or both, suggest an alternative that isn't fit to lace his boots, blame the Manager for not knowing what he's doing on transfers, and call Ed all the names under the Sun....

Guess some people are only happy when they've got something to moan about.
 
Absolutely fecking ridiculous, just as we thought the club was seeing some sense this fecking happens, ruined my day.
 
It tickles me how many fans are getting so bent out of shape just because a good solid pro with 8 years experience at the club, and still with scope to develop into the player we all thought/hoped we were signing when the club, and several people at the club obviously think it's the right thing to do, and we obviously can afford it, so what's the problem ? He's one player in a 25 man squad ffs

And no doubt it'll be the same crowd who will be the first to jump on the first mistake any new defender that comes in makes, ie. scores an own-goal, or gives away a penalty, or both, and will write him off as not good enough, or too expensive, or both, suggest an alternative that isn't fit to lace his boots, blame the Manager for not knowing what he's doing on transfers, and call Ed all the names under the Sun....

Guess some people are only happy when they've got something to moan about.


FFS, he’s 99.9% injured and when he isn’t he’s prone to feck up at every opportunity.
 
He's been here 8 years, he's 26 and he'll be here 5 more. Phil Jones: Manchester United legend.
 
In the 6 years post SAF we have bought 4 centre backs for a total of £90m. Blind, Rojo, Bailly and Lindelof. A look at the spending of each area of the team.

Defence - £160m on 7 players.

Midfield - £320m on 7 players.

Attack - £270m on 7 players.

You are absolutely right that its quantity over quality in defence. Even then, defence has 4 positions while midfield and attack have 3. It's arguable whether we have investment quantity. Someone suggesting we have adequately invested at centre back has got to be a loony, we've bought 4 players in 6 years and only one of them could be considered a success (Blind). Our most expensive centre back signing post SAF is a meagre 35m.

The 80M attacker that got benched by the academy player, is that part of the quality in attack?

The tragedy here is the previous manager has a potential like Rashford and decided to invest 80M of transfer kitty into another striker.
 
I would love to work for an employer that rewards being average/mediocre/injury prone.
Utd need to develop a ruthless streak and get rid of the dross if they serious about challenging for trophies again.
 
No we can't. What if he just doesn't wanna leave ?
He is still young and on low wage, according to you, he can earn more money elsewhere. If he has no future at United, why wouldn't he leave?
 
Because we hoard deadwood like no other club?

Shouldn't blame all on the managers, the board headed by Ed Woodward is equally responsible for all this dross for half a decade and more. Jones and smalling have practically failed at every level to take over from Ferdinand and vidic and are crucial reasons for why we have to suffer our time as a top 4 challenger for years as a better defense wouldn't have put us in this situation, and yet they receive contract extensions as otherwise they would be walking out for free, is just ridiculous.

While we are also losing ground in scouting area to other clubs with the deadwood we are unable or unwilling to move out.
 
According to me ? Where did I even hint at that ? He isn't on low wages IMHO
I think he is on low wage, you think otherwise, we don't know anything for sure yet. But if we decide to criticize someone, isn't it good sense to be sure that we have a really good reason to?

To be clear, we don't know his wage yet and whether this deal is good or bad depends on it. So why did we criticize the club for making a deal which we don't even know if it is good or bad?
 
Last edited:
It tickles me how many fans are getting so bent out of shape just because a good solid pro with 8 years experience at the club, and still with scope to develop into the player we all thought/hoped we were signing when the club, and several people at the club obviously think it's the right thing to do, and we obviously can afford it, so what's the problem ? He's one player in a 25 man squad ffs

And no doubt it'll be the same crowd who will be the first to jump on the first mistake any new defender that comes in makes, ie. scores an own-goal, or gives away a penalty, or both, and will write him off as not good enough, or too expensive, or both, suggest an alternative that isn't fit to lace his boots, blame the Manager for not knowing what he's doing on transfers, and call Ed all the names under the Sun....

Guess some people are only happy when they've got something to moan about.
Take it easy buddy, you're talking sense, you can be slagged off on here for that.
 
Now you are just derailing on purpose I'm afraid.

City bought Laporte, Mendy, Kyle Walker, Silva, Ederson, Danilo - Stones, Sané, Jesus, Gundugan, Bravo, Nolito. In 2 season they got all those players. That's 12 first team players in two summers. We absolutely shouldn't have extended the contract of Jones, because even if we buy just 1 great CB we have Tuanzebe who should replace the role of Jones, Rojo we don't need to replace because he doesn't play just sell him. However, if you are so furious and jealous of City overspending why not make a thread about it? Why do you think you know the reason we fell behind is because Smalling is our best defender? Makes no sense.

Ole doesn't rate him? Based on what? He was injured when Ole took over. I swear i've seen the same post every time a new manager takes over
Not everyone is delusional enough to rate Smalling except you both here. I have seen a goalkeeper with better feet & footballing ability than him , He is lucky that he is a defender , if He was a striker or midfielder you would see how bad a footballer he is , worse than Lukaku in term of playing football. Whatever , he can stay being a squad player and benchwarmer , cause i don't think any offensive manager would fancy starting him. Your chance to watch him play week in week out has gone along with Mourinho. You guys should never wish him sacked.
 
Last edited:
While I don't agree with this decision of the board, it is done. Now I just hope they did it to keep an English player and a player who can be sold in future for a decent value. I also hope that this is not done to avoid the purchase of a quality defender or two because in that case, we will be where we are now. He can be a good squad player when needed but a regular first team place for him does not fill me with confidence. Good luck to him.
 
Nothing to do with Smalling. And that would be a colossal mistake.
I forgot he also signed a new contract the other week.

I assume we’re going to keep Bailly and Lindelof as well, and bring in one. 4 centre backs of dubious quality and the new signing makes me a little nervous.
 
I think he is on low wage, you think otherwise, we don't know anything for sure yet. But if we decide to criticize someone, isn't it good sense to be sure that we have a really good reason to?

To be clear, we don't know his wage yet and whether this deal is good or bad depends on it. So why did we criticize the club for making a deal which we don't even know if it is good or bad?
May as well as close the whole bloody forum then huh ? Extending Jones' contract like bad is bad for me, it's a stupid decision.
 
Phil must know where all the bodies are buried. Can't see any other reason for the fascination the club has with his continued tenure.

In saying that I'd be happy with him occupying a squad role ( little chance of anything else with his abysmal injury stats. ), but I worry this will be at the expense of signing a new centre-half. I don't think the squad needs major investment, but I reckon Ole will martyr himself to the cult of self-sufficiency.
 
I forgot he also signed a new contract the other week.

I assume we’re going to keep Bailly and Lindelof as well, and bring in one. 4 centre backs of dubious quality and the new signing makes me a little nervous.


You really think we’re going to bring in one? Possibly our loanee back from Villa.

We’ll probably bring in a washing powder sponsor.

“Watch this space”
 
Calamity Jones. If the management team are happy with Jonah as Ole calls him then we should trust in their judgement. Thus far Jones has shown just a couple of brain farts in comparison with some pretty stout defending. However, he gives me the collywobbles every time he tackles in our half. The pass that led to the Burnley goal was truly awful for a prof footballer. Contracts, money and pro footy lifestyles - I find the whole subject deeply depressing when so many people barely earn a crust and therefore choose not to comment on the specific details of what he earns.
 
He's not perfect, but whenever he's fit and gets couple of games going, he's pretty good defender.

It's not optimal to lose players for free, so I don't know why people mind his contract.

There are far worse players to release on a free.
 
Not surprising - the homegrown quota means we have to keep hold of as many homegrown players as possible.
 
At the moment we need him yeah but how does that translate into a 4+1 extension ?
Yes, it does. If he stays injury free for a season, we can cash in in 2020.

Jones will be 27-28, on relatively low wages and better than majority of defenders in PL.
 
Yes, it does. If he stays injury free for a season, we can cash in in 2020.

Jones will be 27-28, on relatively low wages and better than majority of defenders in PL.


Two ridiculously high expectations/assumptions
 
I love that people have talked themselves into the idea that the club gave Jones a 4 year contract with an option for a fifth to make it easier to sell him. They gave the contract to Jones because they want him here for the long term.
 
The 80M attacker that got benched by the academy player, is that part of the quality in attack?

The tragedy here is the previous manager has a potential like Rashford and decided to invest 80M of transfer kitty into another striker.

A dig at Lukaku and the previous manager with nothing poignant added, brilliant. A deflection from the mediocre players we have had in our defence for ages. Two of our fullbacks are converted wingers and we're still holding out for £15m for Darmian :lol:

This is a player that has missed games equivalent to 60% of the games he has played. Jones has made 208 appearances for us and missed 120 odd games for us.
 
Yes, it does. If he stays injury free for a season, we can cash in in 2020.

Jones will be 27-28, on relatively low wages and better than majority of defenders in PL.

He has NEVER stayed injury free for a whole season though, and as he gets older, the injury problems are likely to get worse, not better.
 
Yes, it does. If he stays injury free for a season, we can cash in in 2020.

Jones will be 27-28, on relatively low wages and better than majority of defenders in PL.
Why, after almost 8 years, do people still keep dealing with the hypothetical scenario of Jones staying fit?
 
There is still talk of Jones being fit because football fans never learn. It took an age for many fans to see the reality with Anderson.
 
I’m fairly ambivalent re. Jones. He is a good defender (most of the time). But his injury problems are farcical.

People involved in football rate him, though. Moreso than supporters do, a least. From Capello to Ferguson to Mourinho to Solskjaer; they’ll play him when he’s fit. It has to count for something.
 
He has NEVER stayed injury free for a whole season though, and as he gets older, the injury problems are likely to get worse, not better.
His injury problems has actually been receding the last couple of seasons. Which does not support your argument at all. But why bother with facts, right?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.