'Pep' Guardiola sack watch

100m on a lad with calves and a hair tie when he needed a rough rugged striker.

Sums up Pep

While it was a poor transfer, their problem wasn't scoring goals in this leg tbf(even with their missed chances in the 1st led).
 
I wonder if City's senior management will now be emboldened to push back at Pep if he demands a large transfer outlay. I believe City have a few good youngsters and I can see City management only approving money for a new LB and CF. Would that sour the relationship between them enough to negatively affect the 2022-23 season?
 
Fraudiola. Chequebook manager.

Been saying it for YEARS now.

Can only win with prime messi (iniesta, xavi and puyol etc.) in his squad.

How much money has he spent ffs!? Even more than we have and has feck all to show for it in Europe.

klopp is far better and has done more with far less.
 
It's obvious that Champions league is not his forte, he went out so many times against weaker clubs it's painful to watch at this point.

Great managers, especially when it comes to domestic leagues, but it's fair to say he can thank Messi for his CL medals.
 
If they have top goalscorer they would have scored a few goals to be fair.
 
If they have top goalscorer they would have scored a few goals to be fair.
They'd have been in the CL final and comfortable in the league.

The question is why didn't he prioritize a goalscoring wide forward to replace Sterling instead of signing Grealish? 100 million on someone who barely moves the needle is such strange decision making.
 
City were actually somewhat cruising with a 2 goal lead until they completely collapsed. I think his subs really hurt City's chances in ET.
 
Jokes aside I dont think this defeat is on him or how he put the team out there. Some are saying he played possesion game and to pass time. Which is actually smart, he should have gone too offensive, he had the result all the while being active offensively but not too open. If Ederson had come out for the ball instead of Rodrygo scoring or Graelish scored one of those 2 shots before we'd be talking differently and its football. Things change in a second.
But once Madrid goal went in, 1st one, there was only one team winning. And you can say City team dont react well do adversaries.

Saying all that as long as he's on just one CL final since Barcelona it can be taken against him so to say. Not to diminish his success and football knowledge or call him a fraud cause he'll hopefully have 4 domestic titles in 5 years but its certain he has problems with CL. Some can say - so there's pretty high standards for him them and those people would be right.
 
They'd have been in the CL final and comfortable in the league.

The question is why didn't he prioritize a goalscoring wide forward to replace Sterling instead of signing Grealish? 100 million on someone who barely moves the needle is such strange decision making.
Agree Grealish isn’t what they need, maybe Pep is obsessed in having ball player who is good in ball progression, rather than impact type of goalscoring forward.

But I think they originally want Kane last summer for goalscoring but Spur refuses to sell. They then turn their attention to Ronaldo but we hijacked the bid. This summer though they will be signing Haaland so this may solve their problems.
 
Yeah, I'd go along with this. Refereeing decisions cost SAF a chance at getting to 3 or 4, that's the way it goes too it seems. It's not a particularly good way of measuring the abilities of a manager. I'd not choose Zidane over Pep for instance.

It is great though how the endless resources, and financial doping of City and PSG has resulted in everything but the thing they really want. Long may it continue.

Absolutely, Fergie is a great example. By common consensus the GOAT manager. But won the CL only twice, 10 years apart. Many bad losses along the way. Is Zidane a better manager than Fergie because he won 3 in 5 years (or whatever it is) and Fergie won 2 in 20 years? Of course not. It's a knockout competition.

I agree with you about PSG and City, there's something amusing about the manner in which those clubs seem unable to win the Champions League. They will probably get there though, I think it's just very hard to win it for the first time (it's the same with the World Cup). There's just something in the DNA of the historically great clubs that favours them in that competition. Look at how long it took doped up Chelsea to get over the line after so many heartbreaks and near misses.
 
He should have bought some leaders then.

It's in his character to be the leader himself - that's why his teams are successful. It's both a flaw and a strength I suppose. There's more than one way to win of course.
 
City players can play pretty and effective football, but they have a soft center, they lack the Kompany, Fernandinho profile (I know he was subbed on but he is past it at this stage), the way the conceded those two quick fire goals reminded me of our 3-2 comeback against them. Against any opposition that comes close to matching their quality I always fancy them as second best. The simply are bullies who don't know how to fight against their equals.
 
If they bottle the league, I think pep will self combust.
 
I think City and Pep lack a belief they can win the Champions League. Pep knows they're a small club and hasn't won it himself in a very long time. They will need a new manager to do it, someone who has won it recently.
 
Pep made a huge mistake taking off De Bryune and Mahrez too early. He was thinking it was all over, and looking ahead to league games coming up.
 
I think City and Pep lack a belief they can win the Champions League. Pep knows they're a small club and hasn't won it himself in a very long time. They will need a new manager to do it, someone who has won it recently.
Roberto di Matteo
 
I think (and hope!!) Haaland coming in the summer will change our CL fortune.
He is made for this environment, he breathes it, he has intercourse with the match-ball as often as he can.

Outside of De Bruyne we have had fantastic teams but lacked the kind of talismanic player that can snatch wins out of nowhere. Aguero was that for us in the league, and while his CL record was very good the team often let him down. Sane was on his way but sadly not to be. Haaland in my opinion is already a proper CL talisman who just need a team, and we are finally long-overdue a team that consistently reach the semis and finals. We are huge fecking bottlers, but a final last season and leading this jammy mentality-monsters of a Madrid side for 178 minutes really isn't a bad couple of seasons if you take all the emotion away from it.

I understand it's hilarious though from your perspective. Jesus christ we have been pathetic at times in this tournament. Spurs 2019 were worse though in my opinion. We would have gone all the way that year. On current form I'm not sure we would have withstood Liverpool
 
I think City and Pep lack a belief they can win the Champions League. Pep knows they're a small club and hasn't won it himself in a very long time. They will need a new manager to do it, someone who has won it recently.

I don't know about Pep lacking it, but City as a club definitely do.

They probably won't ever win it.
 
His transfer recruitment, and game management vs the top sides in Europe haven't been great. He wins the league by default most seasons by having a huge squad, but if Liverpool make a signing or two I fully expect them to challenge as they now have a large squad themselves. Had they had Diaz from the start of the season to give Mane and Salah a rest they'd likely be ahead of City.

He's a great manager but the label of the best ever is a bit too much when in this current generation what Klopp has done is more impressive for me.
 
No one can tell me Pep wanted a striker but didn't get one. He gets everything that he wants every time and he has no European success to show for it.
 
To quote Michael Scott “I’m not superstitious just a little stitious.” But there might be something into African shamans curse:D. Football curses can work. Just ask Benfica, Guttmann fecked them eternally. Even the great Eusebio going to guttmann’s grave to reverse it didn’t work.
 
Great manager but yet to win the CL without a certain peak GOAT in his team, and that too with two super teams.
pretty much. His last win was 11 seasons ago with the same team. Seems like a distant memory. Alex Ferguson was still around.
He builds some of the best teams, he doesn't just have them....but at City he's had children playing. There's no leadership or character in the City team, it's all Pep. It's amazing how well they do tbh. Maybe should've done better with Bayern, but can't fault his time at City.
inherited treble winners in 2014 already the best in Europe. In 2009 the team that beat us in the CL final, 9 of the starting 11 were already there including Messi, Eto'o Henry and Iniesta and Xavi who had both showed out in Summer 2008 winning the Euros with one of the best midfield displays.

Build what?