SammyUnited_83
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2011
- Messages
- 3,199
Probably means Mandžukić incoming.
We've sold Lukaku and not replaced him. That's a 75m net spend. You really think that's good enough to catch back up to Liverpool and City?
For one of the richest clubs in the world that's a pathetic sum, especially when we're in need of heavy investment.
That was fun while it lasted .
Right round up everyone who was losing their shit and shoot them (or ban them, I guess they dont deserve death)
Just no.Although I'm pleased about this cause he would of been an amazing signing for them it still just goes to show that we could of signed him considering Di Marzio stated Juventus were already getting weary of the deal with Spurs and would of much preferred to sell to us in return for Romelu Lukaku. I honestly believe we could of got him and it will annoy me that we didn't reactivate this deal.
We were never going to catch City in one transfer window, if you thought we would then well I dont know what to say
We were never going to catch City in one transfer window, if you thought we would then well I dont know what to say
I feel bad for you, but Glaston...
It’s not about catching City. We’ve a weaker squad than we did last year.
Nobody said we'd catch them in 1 window, but at least attempt to close the gap. The ambition we're showing is very disappointing.We were never going to catch City in one transfer window, if you thought we would then well I dont know what to say
We were never going to catch City in one transfer window, if you thought we would then well I dont know what to say
We were never going to catch City in one transfer window, if you thought we would then well I dont know what to say
Nobody said we'd catch them in 1 window, but at least attempt to close the gap. The ambition we're showing is very disappointing.
We spend more on Debt a year!
My point is that the wage saving could have been enough to pay the agent or whatever compromise spurs may have reached to get around that and the image rightsIt depends on if you believe his wage demands were too rich for us – I don't believe that was the issue
It seems the club went cold because he didn't really want to come, which is laudable enough I suppose
As Abhinav said though, we were probably too quick to brief after Dybala's initial cold reaction and should have tried to nurture him towards finding the move attractive
It's all elementary now – we aren't doing anything more and are well short
And we are not catching them with transfers too, I believe that if it happens it will be done by the coaching staff and players' individual improvement. We have a lot of players with room to grow, if they do it we will be a very different team.
Probably because of the cost of Lukaku. They don’t have that to factor in nowIf thats true why wouldnt they help us ?! Makes no sense
Thank you for stopping!That was fun while it lasted .
Apparently the same private jet that brought Lo Celso to London from Seville last night has now flown from London to Turin this morning.
In what world did Spurs think they could afford it and make it possible when United couldn’t?
Maybe Juve repents and wants to sell him to us in an hour
Let’s see which one it’ll be.
I reckon it will be between tonight after around 9pm and tomorrow before 9 am. Don't blame him for not trying to spend money.