Sure that's old news, why the feck are they mentioning that again.
Sorry if this has been posted already..
Sorry if this has been posted already..
Interesting if true. Basically shows that our interest in Dybala didn't just materialize about three days ago.
Interesting if true. Basically shows that our interest in Dybala didn't just materialize about three days ago.
Is it Dybala or Bruno or are we going for both?
We will soon find out. Hope we get both. We are definitely focusing on Dybala first.Is it Dybala or Bruno or are we going for both?
It depends on Sarri when they meet on Monday. They will definitely talk and if Sarri wants him in the squad then that is it, he will stay, but if Sarri doesn’t want him juventus wouldn’t miss Dybala that much, because he is not the backbone of the team and didn’t perform well last season.
Juve sold a lot of great players in the past and brought great players as well.
Remember we sold Baggio, Zidane, Inzaghi, Vidal and Pogba and yet didn’t miss them.
Don’t think we need both. They kind of do the same thing: attacking 8 vs false 9.We will soon find out. Hope we get both. We are definitely focusing on Dybala first.
Longstaff for 50m? I fecking hope not. Let him play week in week out next season and we can see more of him before making a decision.Don’t think we need both. They kind of do the same thing: attacking 8 vs false 9.
Would rather we get one and get Longstaff or another as DM.
Is it Dybala or Bruno or are we going for both?
really though?Don’t think we need both. They kind of do the same thing: attacking 8 vs false 9.
Would rather we get one and get Longstaff/another as DM.
And it was his own damn fault for opening his mouth and wanting to go play “for the best manager in this world”. You say that after you signed for them.Judging by lukakus last few tweets this is a done deal. If this falls through and we end up keeping him he is going to get ripped to shreds.
Then another DM then.Longstaff for 50m? I fecking hope not. Let him play week in week out next season and we can see more of him before making a decision.
really though?
Prolly the later. It’s not ideal but we definitely had other pressing areas to fill. We have done two out of the three. If Dybala comes in we are three for three. Next summer hopefully we can get a DM and a RW.Then another DM then.
Or is McT the cover for Matic with Garner as no 3?
Is it Dybala or Bruno or are we going for both?
It his image rights that’s the problem.Just sort it out ffs. How can it take this long to sign an unwanted player with no competition in sight? Lets seal this and move on to Bruno.
Dont we allow our players to keep theirs?It his image rights that’s the problem.
Ole has already said that he sees him as a false 9.Dybala is class for sure. And he’s going to make a big difference when teams sit back against us. Our options now are Lingard (ugh) and Mata (slow, not dynamic enough).
Do you play him on the right side of a front 3, or as a 2nd striker behind Rashford in a 4-4-2, or at the tip of a diamond midfield, roaming?
I reckon we're gonna sign both Sammy.What is funny?
Everything about your post is all over the place. As if anyone would have Longstaff ahead of either and then claiming the position is the same. Tell that to Iniesta and Messi.What is funny?
I struggle to see how Pogba, Bruno and Dybala all play in the same team. It looks attractive on paper with Martial and. Rashford as wide forwards but feels like overkill. OGS is planning for Pereira and McTominay to each play 20+ games too.I already posted this in Bruno thread:
Scenario 1. Primary target was Bruno, we are still fighting over his price. Suddenly, Dybala option materialized as a result of Juventus strong interest in Lukaku. We are eager to get rid of the Belgian, Juve doesn’t have money. So, both Ole and Ed decided to have a look...and we see what’s happening. Dybala is in doubts, but Juve wants Lukaku so badly that they just decided to kick out poor Paulo. United is working on both deals, but Dybala is more likely. So, we get our number 10 in Dybala. I don’t like this scenario because Bruno suits Ole better. But he will kinda settle for Dybala.
Scenario 2. We are in for both Of them. Then our transfer expenses are going to reach 250 million! Bruno is no less than 60, and Lukaku has at least 50 value. Also, we face the problem of playing them together. Highly unlikely.
Any suggestions for the 3rd scenario?
Except his are owned by another agency and he is involved in a lawsuit with them.Dont we allow our players to keep theirs?