Dir Wangem
New Member
This is the kind of stuff we find over at RAWK and laugh at...
RAWK can be self-deprecating? I haven't been there for years, but damn that is a big change.
This is the kind of stuff we find over at RAWK and laugh at...
Oh come on! im sick and tired of checking this thread every 5 mins... i am working in the ICU FFS, announce something before someone dies! :P
How are Real spinning this? "We wanted Drogba all along"?
@Acquire Me was ITK about this that Juve will negotiate regarding Pogba and the club has already made a bid and that, this deal will eventually be done.Hi mate, i know that @Acquire Me knew about Jose signing in advance. But what's with him now? He was an ITK on Pogba signing also? Please reply in details.
TA
La Stampa say the deal can become official today and announced, not that it absolutely will. And who can blame them for not being absolute in the article, when Adidas and all involved are probably trying to work out the optimum announcement time worked on social media algorithms.
Im hoping its that , and nothing to do with extensive care.Does ICU I stand for I Crave Updates ?
Marca: Double agent Pogba infiltrates scum in order to rescue De Gea from prison.
I hope Juve lets us announce it first.We knew everything for Mkhitaryan was agreed and it took a while to get announced.
Both the guardian and independent are saying this:
Di Marzio's initial report has been cleared up by Romano who backs up the above figures. Di Marzio said that we were paying €110m all in but Juve would only net €100m due to Raiola taking his cut (which doesn't make sense as 20% of €110m is €22m not €10m so Juve wouldn't have netted that). Romano cleared it up by saying that the €100m net by Juve is them accounting for €10m that they'll be taxed on the transfer. So let's stop spreading misinformation and doing all sorts of gymnastics to say that we're not paying a world record fee because from day 1 by every account this was/is/would have to be a world record fee for Juve to sell.
Haha, why not again?
The cost to United will be much lower than £92m very very quickly with all the shirt sales. Maybe after a couple of weeks week United will announce the initial shirt sales, and then we can talk about Pogba costing United £40m at that point.
Boom!Sure let's believe Guardian and Independent over Di Marzio who has been on the ball regarding this transfer from day one.
As far as misinformation goes, weren't you the one who started the Madrid and Barcelona sponsorship threads? Have you bothered to rectify it now that it had been found that both of them were wrong infos? Sod off now.
So it's not even a world record after all things considered. 92m total fees with 84m to Juventus and 8m to Raiola.
Sure let's believe Guardian and Independent over Di Marzio who has been on the ball regarding this transfer from day one.
As far as misinformation goes, weren't you the one who started the Madrid and Barcelona sponsorship threads? Have you bothered to rectify it now that it had been found that both of them were wrong infos? Sod off now.
How many shirts do we have to sell to pay off the debt? Is it doable?
We sell a pretty consistent number of shirts each year. The number of people who will buy a Pogba shirt who wouldn't normally have bought one at all will be incredibly small and our share of any profit on that number of shorts entirely inconsequential.Don't know why the shirt sales thing is taken as a myth. We had no share percentage in the Nike deal but the Adidas deal is radically different. It'll make a minimal difference but it'll be a difference.
Unless somebody gets sold and he snatches their number.Are we confident enough yet to pre order No.6 Pogba shirts?
Which commercial? Could you tag it here?
Posted so many times by now, but honestly this comp is
On the subject of the Adidas advert.... It was probably filmed way before the euros. However the only link to us being the banner and the clip of OT. It would have taken about an hour to edit those parts in. It was probably filmed with the Juve brand included originally.
Even if the club got 100% of the cost of a shirt you would need to sell 2 million €60 shirts to make back the cost of the transfer and according to this article 2 million is the number of shirts we sold in 13/14.Don't know why the shirt sales thing is taken as a myth. We had no share percentage in the Nike deal but the Adidas deal is radically different. It'll make a minimal difference but it'll be a difference.
Even if the club got 100% of the cost of a shirt you would need to sell 2 million €60 shirts to make back the cost of the transfer and according to this article 2 million is the number of shirts we sold in 13/14.
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...-disastrous-campaign-under-david-9722715.html
Pogba would not be on the back of all shirts and we do not get 100% of the cost of the shirt so its unlikely that replica sales will have much of an impact.
Yes, we get a % off the Adidas sales. We also get to keep majority of the profits when the merchandise is sold through United channels (ie Megastore etc).I know as I said the difference will be minimal but it's still better than under Nike where we used to get nothing.