I think the reason Pogba would be worth more than say a Kroos or Kante, is more due to his commercial abilities combined with his sporting abilities. His name and "brand" will bring in far more money than a Kroos or Kante (who funnily enough may be equal or better than him on the field). His age is also far younger than Kroos and offers you nearly 10 years of service if you can convince him to stay, and if he leaves he will attract a major sell on fee.
Funny to think we supposedly passed on Kroos and Fabregas for a combined 60m and had Pogba running around in our back yard...now thats a serviceable little midfield.
Yeah I understand the economics of it all. But I am a football fan and Man United supporter. I couldn’t care less what anybody costs, earns or brings in. I want to see us back successful on the pitch. I am not dead against signing Pogba, far from it. Although his performances and arm throwing antics at the Euro’s have tainted my thoughts on him a little.
I just think Kante and Kroos as the two holders provides the energy, tenacity and technical ability to provide the back 4 with enough protection but also a great base for the attacking players in the side.
Im a huge Kroos fan and every time I see him he impresses. I would go as far as saying he is the only “big name” at the Euro’s that has justified / improved his reputation.
I hear your argument and its valid for the money men but commercial “gain” form a player should be seen as a bonus and not a prerequisite. I doubt very much Michael Carrick has much of a commercial worth to the club off the field. However, he’s been an integral member of a side that has won multiple league title and got to 3 champions league finals. I think Kroos is a similar player. The type of player who makes the sum of the parts so much better, Pogba is very much a brilliant player but with him and Zlatan……..bit too galatico for me.