jungledrums
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2014
- Messages
- 2,738
And why do you think that? Need I bother reminding you that United is not a small club, or do you enjoy having the small-club mentality?Number 3. Why I'd rather we didn't buy him.
And why do you think that? Need I bother reminding you that United is not a small club, or do you enjoy having the small-club mentality?Number 3. Why I'd rather we didn't buy him.
Erm no, he's actually not.
Completely agree. You better believe that if Madrid were actually in for Pogba and he was going there, we'd have an all singing all dancing media circle-jerk from Perez. He'd be updating the press minute by minute. The fact all the stories coming out of Madrid are nothing but butt-hurt, we're absolutely fine.100 percent. Especially the vague type of tweets. 'Madrid are considering bidding for Pogba as United haven't concluded the deal'. Send the United fans into a frenzy because big bad Madrid are thinking about stealing their lunch. And gets every anti-United fan to retweet and laugh at the thought of another saga ending in tears for United.
All of the above, based on a tweet that says nothing really. Unreal isnt it.
Well he is close enough
Indykaila is the biggest WUM to ever hit Twitter. How so many people believe him is absolutely beyond me.Tancredi is worse than indykaila
You're missing the regulation spouting of the current Madrid players of things like "he'd be great for Madrid" or "he's exactly what we need" etc.Madrid don't work like that, that is why they don't like Pogba who respects Juventus. Their tactics go something like this:
* Tap up player and offer a ridiculous salary
* Low ball the player's existing club
* If club don't agree, get the player to protest and kick up a fuss
This is the sole reason why Madrid are not in this as the player didn't bite.
He's saying Zidane would have to ask Pogba not to sign the document until Madrid are ready to bid.If Tanc says we have agreed everything then there is no reason for Madrid to be back in. That's what I done understand.
So if I now send out a Tweet saying Chelsea are lining up a sensational £140m swoop for Pogba, according to "sources", might I finally manage to get into double digits of followers?100 percent. Especially the vague type of tweets. 'Madrid are considering bidding for Pogba as United haven't concluded the deal'. Send the United fans into a frenzy because big bad Madrid are thinking about stealing their lunch. And gets every anti-United fan to retweet and laugh at the thought of another saga ending in tears for United.
All of the above, based on a tweet that says nothing really. Unreal isnt it.
He's an actual journo. They are light years apart.
With all due respect, feck off.
You're missing the regulation spouting of the current Madrid players of things like "he'd be great for Madrid" or "he's exactly what we need" etc.
This is another reason why I think it's all tied up bar the shouting.
He maybe a journo, the express have journos who work for them aswell, point is Tancredi has got a lot wrong over the years, so can't be trusted as a reliable source
So if I now send out a Tweet saying Chelsea are lining up a sensational £140m swoop for Pogba, according to "sources", might I finally manage to get into double digits of followers?
I would imagine yes. State that you source(s) work within marketing and they went into overdrive the same day Woodward landed in China.
Pogba was seen talking to an old man in a silly red coat, believed to be one of the Chelsea Pensioners.I would imagine yes. State that you source(s) work within marketing and they went into overdrive the same day Woodward landed in China.
Growing tired of checking this thread now. I swear the last 30 odd pages have just been tweets rehashing the same information over and over coupled in with people shitting themselves that Madrid are going to hijack the deal.
Im always amazed that not a single 'source' has come from Banking or Finance sectors. I would expect the leaks to come from there since those are the guys dealing with the money.
I hear you. It's getting tiring watching people panic every time Madrid are mentioned.Growing tired of checking this thread now. I swear the last 30 odd pages have just been tweets rehashing the same information over and over coupled in with people shitting themselves that Madrid are going to hijack the deal.
I hear you. It's getting tiring watching people panic every time Madrid are mentioned.
Yeah I think you're spot on with this.I think Juve are using Italian journos to show that are putting up a fight, but in reality they are happy to sell, hence DiMarzio getting Andre Gomez info wrong, Juve probably fed him it to suit their narrative.
Here we go again. Joy late night, negativity through the day. Its like a vicious circle, just like all the failed transfers go.
I hear you. It's getting tiring watching people panic every time Madrid are mentioned.
I haven't read the debate but for me the whole stuff such as "X player is more marketable and therefore higher value" is rubbish (except when the said player is from a relatively untapped market, say like Kagawa or a Chinese/Indian player). As you said, the pure marketing value of a player is minuscule compared to the overall spending on the player. So if I am getting a player who is demonstrably better than another at the same price, I buy the first player regardless of any other consideration.
For any top tier club such as ours, winning trophies consistently is much more valuable than anything else. From a pure financial perspective, the revenue growth potential of a winner club over time is much higher than another top club, which say, qualifies for CL every year. And therefore any top player that will help in winning trophies would always command a premium valuation commensurate to the growth potential.
As an example, if we consider Cantona to be a key factor in our success in early nineties that allowed us to create a gap between us and Liverpool, how much value would we subscribe to him going back? I would say he would be immensely valuable (in 1990s prices of course) irrespective of his marketing potential.
I'd say it's due to the past history of Madrid wanting someone and getting them without trouble.Why are people choosing to believe Big Tanc and AS over the Di Marzio crew, who say that whilst Madrid may be interested, they can't afford it?
I thought Di Marzio et all were considered way more reliable than the Tanc.
I'm glad someone said it.With all due respect, feck off.
This. Well put and I think you're spot on RE: Scholes and co.
I'd say it's due to the past history of Madrid wanting someone and getting them without trouble.
They see Madrids name mentioned against a player who we're after, and start to panic. After Vidal, Thiago, Sneijder etc, muppets have become fragile
Looks like Zidane has confirmed Pogba interest,dont think we will be able to sign him now.We should have closed the deal ages ago,same old Mr Woodward.
Mediaset are reporting Juventus board think that Madrid will make a counter offer for Pogba.I guess the deal is evenly poised.
Barca have signed Gomez,so does it bring Madrid back in the contention for Pogba? I hope not.
Can anyone fill me with optimism.Looks like we are about to lose out on another player to Madrid.
Mate El Confidential has written in their newspaper that Zidane and Pogba got in touch last night.They say Pogba is more inclined to join Madrid.
Jonas Giæver @CheGiaevara 2m2 minutes ago
Onda Cero are speculating whether or not the failure to sign André Gomes now "activates the Pogba option" for Real Madrid. Might go back in.
Chippy Rick @Ch1ppyR1ck 11m11 minutes ago
So @tancredipalmeri on @talkSPORTLive says #RMCF are going big for #Pogba
A poster said this is what he said.I hope this is not true.
According to Tancredi and Spanish press Madrid are back in for Pogba.If Madrid are back in then we know how it will end up.
Odd that you think he is spot on with that speculative post when he conveniently omits that :
- Pogba was totally over-run and looked clueless in the few matches he was handed game time (which were against rather poor opposition)
- That the Pogba that plays/played at Juve does not play in Scholes or Carricks position.
- That season we were in a tight title race that we ended up losing, Would you give a young player that previously showed he couldn't cope against poor opposition game time? (The drawback being totally crushing his confidence, because he'd have got abuse if he played like he did in his first games, and he'd have been hooked too).
But for some it is an agenda, whereas proof was in the pudding. The funny thing is that the Euro's proved he still can't play in central midfield.