Any football fan that tries to insinuate that McTominay is better than Pogba just isn’t worth listening to at all. And there are plenty of them on here.
Scott’s goals are being mentioned but pretty sure Pogba has matched even that metric for this season now. And even if he hasn’t, what are we trying to say? That Scott is better?
Now Pogba hasn’t scored enough ‘home goals’. Okay, but what about the away goals then? He’s also missed a year’s worth of football in that two year spell that keeps being mentioned but again - even if that were not the case, it is still idiotic to try and use goal stats to appraise him. He scored relatively late yesterday. Are we saying that until that point, he was playing poorly?
The ‘consistency’ argument is similarly bollocks. He’s been consistently very good this season, yet the post match praise is always ‘excellent when he decides...’, or ‘when he turns it on’ etc. Meanwhile, all of our other good players are apparently assumed to just be brilliant every game. In fact, there’s a section that use consistency to imply Scott has greater value, as while Pogba is ‘more talented’, it’s a case of ‘when he feels like’, so Scott is preferred, who can barely string 3 good games together himself. Then there’s the fact that a ‘good game’ for Scott McTominay and a good game for Pogba are completely different levels anyway.
What this season has shown me is that it’s clear that for a small (shrinking, even) group, Pogba will never simply be unobjectively top player. And praise will be backhanded, and it’s best to just leave that lot. The conversation is becoming boring for me, let them think what they want. The thing is, I don’t even think they think that, not deep down. They have just picked a side and are now committed.