Pogba might be our most talented player (or well, next to Greenwood), but there is no doubt that Bruno is currently the better player and is playing better than Pogba.
To be fair, it seems that Pogba is ok with it, and he seems fine to be a supporting player. Which actually is the place where he seems to perform best (Juve, France). Probably does not have the necessary skills to be the main player, but as long as he is fine with it, then it is good. I would take the Pogba of the last few weeks (or the one in World Cup) for the next few years.
I’m not so keen on this comparison thing myself. I mean, as has been mentioned earlier, player comparison is natural, but the belittling of one of your own players to campaign for another one is counter-productive.
With regards to Bruno being ‘better’, I can see the argument, although I don’t agree with it as such. I think he has a far greater argument for being ‘more important’ than Pogba than he does for being a ‘better’ player. Pogba aside, I generally think Bruno is more useful than he is good. Just in comparison to other great 10s of recent times. I’d struggle to say he’s ‘better’ than Coutinho or Ozil at his peak for example. Just watching them, there’s a clear difference in ability. Bruno is the man we needed though, more than even a ‘better’ 10. It wasn’t necessarily even the environment for the most genius 10 before he came. Bruno is greater suited to us, but what he falls a little short of in genius/talent - he makes up for in drive and urgency which gets the team going further forward. In isolation, I don’t think he is ‘better’ than Pogba, but there’s a stronger argument for importance. It’s like comparing Gerrard and Zidane as #10s. Both great players, Zidane clearly ‘better’, in isolation, but Gerrard also got great numbers and Zizou likely wouldn’t have matched his impact.
Saying Bruno is better than Pogba is a little simplistic though, to me. To use a comparison that still fits, with one of the caf’s most favoured players - it would be like seeing what Bruno is doing in the 10 role, and then saying he was better than Scholes, who was keeping things ticking over 10 yards further back. I’m sure most on here would not say Bruno was the better midfielder between him and Scholes, regardless of his amount of goals. Watching them tells enough of a story.
I think Pogba is United’s best player in that he is the highest quality one. The two compliment each other perfectly though. Bruno is more useful to us than a perhaps more talented 10 who also like to control a game. Bruno isn’t interested in controlling a match, he’s more concerned with deciding it. But he isn’t ‘better‘ than Pogba, or Scholes, or Xavi - who don’t have the same sort of impact on their teams as Bruno does. As young as he is, I think Greenwood has the best shout of being the next ‘best’ player in the team along with Pogba. The boy is a freak, he’s technically better than Bruno and if he decided he wanted to play as a 10 tomorrow, Bruno would be on the bench. I think he’ll soon be our best player, even better than Pogba.