If Fulham are really demanding 15 million then that's quite a gamble on youth unless we're talking about Cristiano Ronaldo esque talents. Very few teenagers are worth that amount of money. The last few times we've tried this, it didn't work out, Zaha, Powell.We should be looking at these type of signings more as well along with the Galacticos Woody is obviously eyeing.
Chelsea have particularly done well with such.
Think it's more jealousy, the fact City can throw £15m at an unproven talent and if it doesn't work out then they'll just sell him to Sunderland or a midtable team, at a loss.The bitterness towards City on here is painful to read.
I don't think that makes sense really. It's not like City's first-team doesn't need improving. It's ageing and mediocre in many positions and carried by a few star names (Agüero primarily). We're probably stronger right now if you compare the match-day squad.Think it's more jealousy, the fact City can throw £15m at an unproven talent and if it doesn't work out then they'll just sell him to Sunderland or a midtable team, at a loss.
I think cause of we've failed to improve our first team each summer over the past 5 years, has hurt us and we can ill afford to spend such money on a youngster. If this was 2 years down the line, I think it'd be a different story, as the first team will only need one or two signings a summer to improve it, freeing up more money on future talent.
Though if you were looking long term and with particular reference to the home grown player quotas perhaps Roberts would look like a better optionMy guess if he goes to City he wont get much gametime and will end up being loaned out to a mid-table club next January. This guy for £15m or Pedro for £22m and its a no brainer id take Pedro any day.
My guess if he goes to City he wont get much gametime and will end up being loaned out to a mid-table club next January. This guy for £15m or Pedro for £22m and its a no brainer id take Pedro any day.
If Fulham are really demanding 15 million then that's quite a gamble on youth unless we're talking about Cristiano Ronaldo esque talents. Very few teenagers are worth that amount of money. The last few times we've tried this, it didn't work out, Zaha, Powell.
The benefit to buying players young is that they're usually less expensive but at this price level you may as well get a player in his prime. 15 million for this guy or 22 for Pedro? Even without being a massive Pedro fan I think it's an easy choice.
Though if you were looking long term and with particular reference to the home grown player quotas perhaps Roberts would look like a better option
Have to say it does annoy me that City and Chelsea are pushing ahead of us in this regard.Ugh, gutted. Still, you can't have 'em all.
City are willing to pay to get the kids at the moment, right down to the youngest age groups. If we're not going to match them, there's still one fool-proof way to keep yourself attractive to the very best youngsters, and that's to keep the path to the first team open. Van Gaal's made tentative steps in that direction and hopefully there's more to follow this season. City, you can be fairly confident, won't be going there any time soon.
Have to say it does annoy me that City and Chelsea are pushing ahead of us in this regard.
But but but city have built a really expensive stadium and academy for the kids, and are signing some of the best u14s in the worldNot bothered. He'll probably flop knowing City and their youth record.
There was that hilariously dramatic article by Andy Mitten the other day, in which he slated our youth set up, saying how far behind city we were falling. Then yesterday I watched the second half of the United game and we had seven academy graduates on the field: Wilson, Pereira, Januzaj, NcNair, Evans, Blackett and Lingard. None of whom looked out of their depth.
Wilson, Pereira, Januzaj
Think it's more jealousy, the fact City can throw £15m at an unproven talent and if it doesn't work out then they'll just sell him to Sunderland or a midtable team, at a loss.
I think cause of we've failed to improve our first team each summer over the past 5 years, has hurt us and we can ill afford to spend such money on a youngster. If this was 2 years down the line, I think it'd be a different story, as the first team will only need one or two signings a summer to improve it, freeing up more money on future talent.
Maybe we could. But won't cause Woody still wants to get Bale.We could do it without any problem.
Maybe we could. But won't cause Woody still wants to get Bale.
Wilson, Pereira, Januzaj, TFM, Gomes, these are top top class talents 4/5 will make it not to mention Tuanzebes and Gribbins crop.
We have great youth coming through academy ranks, just because we don't buy every Bebe doesn't make us struggling in this department. Anyway we should be monitoring the market in case there is new Messi.
Any chance of knowing how many scouts work for us?
Not bothered. He'll probably flop knowing City and their youth record.
There was that hilariously dramatic article by Andy Mitten the other day, in which he slated our youth set up, saying how far behind city we were falling. Then yesterday I watched the second half of the United game and we had seven academy graduates on the field: Wilson, Pereira, Januzaj, NcNair, Evans, Blackett and Lingard. None of whom looked out of their depth.
Or maybe we're inclined to think twice before we do another Zaha.
It's about priorities. I doubt we've taken our eye off the ball with regards to the most promising young English talent, but right now we need to get our squad ready for a title push and the CL. Let's not forget that it was only a year ago that we had no CL football, had to fight hard to secure 4th place last year and still aren't actually in the CL proper. Our priority right now is improving the first team squad. Once we're in a comfortable position and aren't required to spend north of £100m on 5-6 players each summer we will probably start looking to invest in the unpolished English diamonds coming through the ranks.
The key to bringing through youth for the big clubs is being able to do it from a position of strength. We're not in that position yet.
It's about priorities. I doubt we've taken our eye off the ball with regards to the most promising young English talent, but right now we need to get our squad ready for a title push and the CL. Let's not forget that it was only a year ago that we had no CL football, had to fight hard to secure 4th place last year and still aren't actually in the CL proper. Our priority right now is improving the first team squad. Once we're in a comfortable position and aren't required to spend north of £100m on 5-6 players each summer we will probably start looking to invest in the unpolished English diamonds coming through the ranks.
The key to bringing through youth for the big clubs is being able to do it from a position of strength. We're not in that position yet.
Agreed but it is a shame though. Roberts is absolutely the type of player I could see us being in for during Fergie's days and if Sterling had come from any other club I'd like to have thought we'd be in for him too so that was just unfortunate.
So is Mitten now officially the latest in the ever-increasing line of United-related people who we for no apparent reason have decided are fools? I can't keep up anymore.
Nobody's saying the potential negative effects on our academy from City's aggressive, new recruitment policy will be immediate. It won't affect us today and it won't affect us tomorrow. But a few years from now, don't be too surprised if the next Evans, Wilson, Lingard or Blackett struts his stuff in sky blue.