Klopper76
"Did you see Fabinho against Red Star & Cardiff?"
I find it astonishing that some are listing Foden as overrated. He’s a phenomenal player.
United edition:
Patrice Evra and David De Gea are the most overrated United players.
I already hoped in 2015 that De Gea’s Real move would have gone through. I don’t think they’d have won half of those trophies the following years if they signed De Gea in 2015, he’s always been limited, and mentally and physically soft.
Evra was good for three seasons and still not the best in his position in the league. He had good technique but he was never as good as top FBs defensively or offensively. He was a liability between 2011-2014, always carelessly jogging out of position and incapable of putting in a decent cross. I was disappointed that we only signed Alex Büttner instead of some serious competition for Evra. Evra’s fitness and superior team-mates are the only things he has over Luke Shaw.
Others:
Memphis
One of those players who has much bigger ego than ability. Pales miserably in comparison with all the Dutch attackers of previous generation.
Zlatan
Great player, but his peak was not close to Henry or Suarez, let alone Messi or Ronaldo. His god complex media persona has boosted his reputation.
Victor Valdes
Barcelona could have won even more with a better goalkeeper.
Berbatov
Very cool footballer, but our attack was never as fluid and dynamic after him, his signing was a big mistake that kind of started the decline of our football with many other things (especially lack of young, ambitious signings).
Veratti is overrated and Kovacic is underrated. They are essentially the same player. If you did a Veratti to Chelsea and Kovacic to PSG swap no one would notice any difference.
Maybe that sentence was not the best way to describe him being overrated. I think there are United fans on this forum who would take him back, while he is seriously one of the most hopeless attacking players we’ve ever had. That is overrating, because he hasn’t developed as a player.Everyone agrees witht his.. Literally everyone...
There are a lot of fans here stating he is absolute shit, because of his underwhelming stint here.. There are also a lot of people saying he has developed into a good player, but I havent heard anyone saying he is worldclass or comes close to being the player RVP, Van Basten, Bergkamp, RVN were... (saying his numbers are better for the NT are just facts, nothing to argue about or mentioning that is not implying he was better than those mentioned)...
By who is he overrated according to you then? By only Memphis himself? Sounds like you are merely mentioning him here because you dislike his character..
I didn’t say I don’t think he is good, but I think he is massively overrated. The whole gazza at the euros last year was cringe and he did very little if anything of note during that tournament.Madness. Start watching him properly.
In a 4-3-3 I reckon he'd have played through the middle as a false 9, although younger / quicker Raul could have played on either side as a wide forward. He was pretty hot as a 9 / 9.5 / 10 for Real and showed the sort of qualities that have become more prized in the modern game.Raul is a tough one because he would be an awkward fit on most teams now that most everyone plays one up top. Would he have become an attacking midfielder or just play as a wide forward off the right in the half space? Or as a 9 who drops deep a ton?
The winning goal for the 2002 world cup by Ronaldo was a tap in after a Kahn spill. Tap ins require the player to anticipate and be there to tap in
Maybe that sentence was not the best way to describe him being overrated. I think there are United fans on this forum who would take him back, while he is seriously one of the most hopeless attacking players we’ve ever had. That is overrating, because he hasn’t developed as a player.
Obviously he’s had some decent goalscoring seasons in Ligue1, but based on the hype he had during early days with PSV, his career has been quite underwhelming. And outside his stats, he often fails the eye test.This is a truly ridiculous statement..
Obviously he’s had some decent goalscoring seasons in Ligue1, but based on the hype he had during early days with PSV, his career has been quite underwhelming. And outside his stats, he often fails the eye test.
If he were to come back to Premier League, I don’t think he would score ten league goals or make a big impact. Because he hasn’t developed enough to stand out in such a competitive league.
He's only scored 23 and assisted 10 in his last 24 matches for Holland as well......so overrated.Obviously he’s had some decent goalscoring seasons in Ligue1, but based on the hype he had during early days with PSV, his career has been quite underwhelming. And outside his stats, he often fails the eye test.
If he were to come back to Premier League, I don’t think he would score ten league goals or make a big impact. Because he hasn’t developed enough to stand out in such a competitive league.
I think most current players are overrated. I don’t see anyone in the league of Ronaldinho, Zidane, Messi, the Ronaldo’s, Maradona etc
As a teamsport football continues to rise but individually it is hard for me to get really excited by anyone.
Can we just establish that overrate does not mean bad? I feel like people, myself included, see the word overrated and automatically assume the person thinks the player they're talking about is terrible or bang average. It's possible to simultaneously think a player was absolutely world class and a tad overrated at the same time, hence why you see a lot of legendary names posted here.
Exactly. I don't think Drogba was the Chelsea version of Darren Bent. I just think he's closer to a Torres or a Dwight Yorke than he is to the greatest strikers the league has ever seen. He doesn't have the ability or goal scoring record IMO to be up there and people's perceptions of him are tinted by his big game goal scoring record. For some reason Henry gets hailed as not being a big game player even though he scored plenty in Europe and against the top sides in the country. He didn't even play in as many finals for us as Drogba did for Chelsea, I count three. Torres had the technical ability he but flamed out pretty quickly and didn't really score that much overall. I'd put Suarez ahead of Drogba as well.
How you pick the best CM of all time saying this nonsense.?
So why did Spain fall off when he retired???? They still had Iniesta, Thiago, Xabi Alonso etc but hey!If you really think that you couldn't replace Xavi with any other world class midfield operator of the past or present within that Barca triumverate under Guardiola and it wouldn't have been as effective, fair enough. I strongly disagree though. Even a guy like Verratti (who has not done enough to be considered a legend) does everything that Xavi did and a lot more besides. Hence how he has consistently stood out in a largely dysfunctional PSG side all of his career against top European opposition whereas Xavi was only seen as a "good" player prior to the age of 28 and the arrival of Pep.
Zidane won the ballon d'or simply for his 2 headed goals in the 1998 final. His only good game in the 2006 world cup was vs Brazil and the only reason why he was voted Pott at 2006 wc. His only great moment in the ucl was the goal vs Leverkusen. In short, his career has been about great moments without any consistency.No, Iniesta is the one overrated. Never the main guy, always the sidekick. Xavi was the one who ran games. Zidane was talismanic and had a star quality Iniesta never possessed.
I find it astonishing that some are listing Foden as overrated. He’s a phenomenal player.
See response to @TenonTenI actually think the opposite.
Think Zidane is fairly rated, he was a superstar and was at one point the best player in the world.
I think Iniesta is slightly overrated. I think Xavi was the star midfielder. Xavi was fantastic prior to Pep's arrival, whilst Iniesta was on the fringes. I believe that being able to play off of Xavi led to Iniesta being regarded as being better than he actually was.
If Iniesta played for most other teams, I don't think he would be as recognized as he currently is. His game relies too heavily on factors that not every team has. Where Xavi creates the setting, I feel that Iniesta requires the setting to perform. I don't think you can ever make that statement about Zidane.
I'll start
Didier Drogba- He scored a few cup final goals and people compare him to the best premier league strikers at all times. Not a chance. He never had the technique or goal scoring record to hang up there with Aguero, Henry & Shearer, even Rooney was better.
Go.
Ruud van Nistelrooy. Great finisher, poor overall player. Both United and Madrid were better before and after he was there.
But he's still no winner of this award. This trophy can clearly only go to one player. Obviously Paul Pogba. Incredibly overhyped since he was a United youth player. Always portrayed as the next best player of the world. During his whole carreer all the hype and stardom around him. In reality Paul Pogba is a slightly above average player, who occassionally plays a very good match but his regular performances are not exceeding the mediocre level. I have never seen so much overhyping in my life.
First you mention Zlatan and I nod. Then you mention Benzema and I'm like finally someone who realizes how crap he was for years at Madrid.
... And then you ruined it with Scholes. Completely.
It is no coincidence Scholes is synonymous with the success of Man United across two decades. Pirlo is not even in the same class as Scholes.
He was absolutely vital for us. The guy was our general, metronome whatever you may call it. So many attacks would just start with him. Shame more complex stats didn't exist back then.
Do you think my opinion might be overrated?Or are you overrating him?
Do you think my opinion might be overrated?
David Beckham- Felt he was overrated but he was always lifted due to 1. Being English 2. Insane free kick taker 3. Insane good looks
Overall he is probably widely looked at as the 4th best player in the 4 man midfield he played in and he definitely wasn't at the time.
Absolutely. Giggs and Scholes may get ahead due to longevity but for me when they were all here only Keane was better than Becks.Yeah for the 96-02 period I’d have him second best in that midfield after Keane.
I'd definitely agree with this. His work rate was unbelievable. He scored big goals, and big assists. He's most definitely underrated.Yeah for the 96-02 period I’d have him second best in that midfield after Keane.