You know he's only 23 right?
No, I did not; this is startling and brand new information. Cheers for cluing me in, mate!
At 23 Dani Alves was at Sevilla
Dani Alves was not just at Sevilla; he was dominating vast spaces almost single-handedly, and crucially, showing improvement on a year-to-year basis (from little Bahia (a much lower starting point vis-à-vis Alexander-Arnold) to his developmental years at Sevilla and evolving to reach a point where major clubs were interested in him). Whereas Alexander-Arnold seems to have stagnated as an all-round footballer (who exceled at certain things and continues to excel at those things, but hasn't come up leaps and bounds in other aspects).
at 23 Cafu played for Sao Paulo
São Paulo with Telê Santana at the helm (and players like Raí, Cerezo, Leonardo, Juninho, Ceni in the mix) was probably the last truly great club team from South America, so this should be “at 23, Cafú played for THE São Paulo”. Monopolized the continental club scene, and also won the Intercontinental Cup vs. Cruyff's Barcelona and Capello's Milan. And again, Cafú showed meaningful progress. Baby steps in the formative stages, then one of the best at his position — and by 1994 (at age 24), he was South American Footballer of the Year, a mainstay for World Cup winners Brazil and probably the best fullback in the world with Maldini; a high-octane force of nature with an unmatched work ethic.
Already he has 45 assists in the Premier League. Already he's been named in Fifa World Team of the Year, UEFA Team of the Year, 2x ESM, IFFHS Team of the Year, already CL team of the season, already 3x Premier League Team of the Season.
This does not signify much, and does not strengthen the argument in Alexander-Arnold's favor IMO. He boasts a long list of award-based accomplishments and statistical achievements, and has time on his side — everyone is aware of that and no one denied those basic facts. He just seems to lack the non-stop motor, urgency and rigorousness of truly great fullbacks (stuff that will be magnified and repeatedly exploited when when the dominance around him starts to fade and he's asked to shoulder greater responsibility, in and out of possession). On the basis of his accomplishments, he is a great fullback on paper. I just wonder if the fundamentals are there for him to be a genuinely and consistently great fullback in actuality (now or over the long haul); and whether he can keep improving on a year-to-year basis, when he hasn't evidenced comprehensive improvement in recent years. For what it's worth, I don't have a bone to pick with Alexander-Arnold, and he's clearly a very skilled and precise playmaker — if he shows greater appetite and improves to become a better fullback who is a factor in multiple phases of the game, I will gladly eat humble pie.
He's better than Robertson.
Fair. You're entitled to that opinion. If everyone agreed, the Café would be a boring place!