El Jefe
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2012
- Messages
- 5,730
Riveting insight.Sure if you say so.
Riveting insight.Sure if you say so.
We need an experienced goalscorer that can come in and do the job immediately, otherwise we're wasting the improvements that the others have madeNo but we shouldn't be adding more over 30s to that list. We could be unfortunate and see a steep decline in all of them soon enough.
I’m in agreement with the overall point but; since when do Spurs sell?(!)I like the idea of a younger striker, but Kane is more or less perfect for Ten Hag and this team. We’ve got plenty of youth in that front line as it is.
Also, since when do Napoli sell?
Arsenal are doing fine without an experienced goal scorer. I think we should follow their example. Focus on young, hungry players who will be here for years to come.We need an experienced goalscorer that can come in and do the job immediately, otherwise we're wasting the improvements that the others have made
At the moment Kane fits that profile, if the price is right then we should get him but not for silly sums, his wages will be high of course but his fee shouldn't be mega high, he's the top least risk free option
They may not have a choice, Kane can walk away in a years time on a free, Spurs have to decide whether they can keep him or get something for himI’m in agreement with the overall point but; since when do Spurs sell?(!)
Arsenal are doing fine yes, but we're not in the goals scored department, that's what we need and a striker we know will score goals is a better option for us than one who may or may notArsenal are doing fine without an experienced goal scorer. I think we should follow their example. Focus on young, hungry players who will be here for years to come.
The pace thing is a bit over stated IMO, he never was quick to start with, Sheringham was the same, and older when we bought him and he didn't do too badIf we can get him at a reasonable price - i would go for Kane which means we could put the rest of the kitty towards that CM EtH seemingly wants. But if they're both going to cost 100m, i'd go for the younger Osimhen as he's younger. Albeit i think Kane is probably highly suited to EtH's requirements - can drop deep, can lead the line, big/strong, can link play and can find Rashford with his vision etc. though i believe his lost a yard of pace.
yeah if we also surround him with pace like Rashford (like he currently is with Son) etc. i don't see a big issue with it either as he was never truly blessed with exceptional pace. It was just an observation.The pace thing is a bit over stated IMO, he never was quick to start with, Sheringham was the same, and older when we bought him and he didn't do too bad
The pace thing is a bit over stated IMO, he never was quick to start with, Sheringham was the same, and older when we bought him and he didn't do too bad
Of course he can, he did plenty of it at the WCCan Kane still press
Just agreeing mate, chill out.Riveting insight.
I’m in agreement with the overall point but; since when do Spurs sell?(!)
Well he's patently not a one season wonder, he does seem to have had ankle issues but not this season I think, ankles are odd, I had a big problem with mine in my 20's, I'd just roll them over, twist and sprain them for no apparent reason, then it just stopped around age 30, no rhyme or reason for it, just started and then just stoppedHe also looks a yard faster than a few years ago, as Conte has got him a lot leaner.The myth that he’s lost pace is up there with him being injury prone and a one season wonder.
He also looks a yard faster than a few years ago, as Conte has got him a lot leaner.The myth that he’s lost pace is up there with him being injury prone and a one season wonder.
Of course he can, he did plenty of it at the WC
Doesn't Kane's contract expire in 2024? Surely they can't expect anything like that much for him with a year left on his contract?
Constantly. Carrick, Berbatov, Bale, Walker, Eriksen.
A lot might also depend on Kane himself, he wants and what Levy wants might not be the same thing. I don't see him going abroad TBH, Bayern won't want him and I can't see RM or Barca either, PSG maybe but doubtful, that only leaves Italian or English clubsI'm not sure it's realistic, but apparently that's their stance... whether they'd risk losing him for free though, I honestly don't know. Levy is a hard one to predict.
This is a tough one. Is Osimhen better than his stats? It looks quite average considering how Lukaku was able to steamroll Serie A but looked completely lost playing for Chelsea. I'm a bit worried about Kane's injury record but we've seen a lot of top strikers play well in their 30's recently.
He's not. He's scoring at a clear level above them.
Non penalty goals per 90 in their Serie A seasons (including current seasons).
Lukaku: 0.51, 0.56, 0.26
Tammy: 0.41, 0.31
Osimhen: 0.57, 0.64, 0.83
In other words Osimhen's worst season in Serie A is better than any of Lukaku or Abraham's in terms of goal rate. And we see the same same thing when we look at their underlying stats.
Lukaku: 0.43, 0.57, 0.33
Tammy: 0.49, 0.55
Osimhen: 0.61, 0.62, 0.59
Other than having played in the same league, these are not comparable players.
Osimhen for me, but partly due to age. Don't actually think we'll sign either though due to funds being an issue
This a myth. If Lukaku steamrolled Serie A, then he also steamrolled the PL during his Everton spell... And of course, then Osimhen is destroying Serie A. His stats are not average. They are far better than Lukaku's...
That’s cute. But what he meant was who has he outscored in a season?
This is currently the best season he’s had/will have.
People argue Kane is a one season wonder? How? He's had five 20+ goal seasons in the league.
RVP was the best signing because we won the league but if we'd failed then he would've been a waste. Kane is tempting at the moment because this is the weakest City and Liverpool have looked in a while so we might actually have a window where we can win the league. However, we're in the current mess simply because we went for short term singings.depends on the price tage. Kane has 1 yr left in his contract summer so he is pretty much gettable than Osimhen plus tottenham would probably out of UCL next season which will motivate Kane to leave.
before RvP was signed, some of the cafe expressed doubt about his injury history and his age and He turned out one (imho he is the best) of the greatest signing of the past decade.
18 PL games this season, 37 last season, 35 the season before, a couple of seasons of high 20's and then 30+ a season prior to that - he's missed 5 PL games in the last 2.5 seasons, yeah his fitness can't be relied upon!!Kane's fitness cannot be relied upon, especially transitioning into his 30s. He'll demand megabucks also.
Osimhen for me, but partly due to age. Don't actually think we'll sign either though due to funds being an issue
We don't actually have any new ownersI doubt funds will be an issue for our new owners
We don't actually have any new owners
Yes, Casemiro has been great. Benzema is great. Doesn't mean my point about Liverpool needing almost a whole new team is false.
We have enough over 30s. We should buy a young striker.