Ole Gunnar Solskjær | 2021/22 Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
I had faith, he has had 12 months, how much time does he realistically need?

The reason I lose faith is every 2/3 performances there is always one where we look lost, out of sorts and out run. This has been going on since Everton last year, Cardiff, Huddersfield then into this year at Southampton, Bournemouth, West Ham, Watford, Arsenal, Newcastle.
Well he needs more faith, more time and more money. At minimum he needs 6 transfer windows.
 
Yes, I believe OGS does not have a plan, 12 months in charge and there is no style.

Doesn't matter the size of the company if people who are in charge are not good enough, the company will fail.

Spurs cannot be counted as one of the big teams, they have only recently come onto the block.

So you can mention clubs like Chelsea who have had transfer ban, City who have won 2 titles in 2 years but how about Wolves, Sheffield and the like?

Why do you belive OGS does not have a plan? Anything he said or done. There is no style? Based on what, not winning enough? There's obviously a game plan. Successful or not. Look at the squad. He can hardly field an XI every game compareable to anyone in the top 4. We're 5th.

Spurs can't be counted? Come on..

Chelsea are excused because of the transfer ban? Why, their squad is so much worse then ours? What about Wolves and Sheffield?
 
Everyone wanted Olé to succeed. He's a club legend, he has it's best interests at heart, he has a vision.
He simply lacks the ability to execute it.
He's too emotive when it comes to decision making. He thinks that because Fergie stuck with a (ridiculously good) group of youth players, he needs to do the same. No. Sticking with Jesse Lingard is inexcusable. He hasn't done his job in over a year, it's ridiculous to play him in any form. We've all seen the stats, surely Olé has.
Sticking with a broken system is unforgivable, especially when it's hampering the development of ACTUAL decent footballers. Greenwood doesn't start these games - presumably in a bit to 'protect' him... yet he's regularly brought off the bench when we're chasing a win in some sort of hail mary roll of the dice. That's really helping his development Olé, cheers.
He's had a year, it hasn't worked. I don't know who is the man for the job, but it's clear that Olé isnt.
That said, he's probably got the safest job in the PL, he is a human shield for the Glazers & Woodward, a 'yes' man to their whims, protected by the 'top red' brigade who STILL think a decent into mid-table mediocrity is more noble than wanting what's best for the club.
His win percentage would have seen him sacked by any other club, except the money men at OT who care not about win percentages, but more about profit margins.
If he gives Lingard a contract extension & markets him as a "new signing", I'm giving up my season ticket.
 
Yeah people do not understand it needs to get worse before it gets better. Cardiff was wrong to sack him since he would have taken them to new levels with time. At Molde it worked well since they gave him time.

If we just clear the deadwood and play with our academy players things will work fine. He has already started the process.
Lingard is not deadwood though since he is one of our own so he should always start. Also we should spend huge money on overrated players in order to raise confidence for our academy players. When they see how bad the rest in our team is they will raise the level to get a spot in the side.
Worked with all our youths so far so let's keep faith!
Don't forget Mike Smalling. Mike to Roma was Ole doing him a favor to find a nicer place to live. Good guy.
 
Last edited:
Ole is doing a fantastic job. He worked miracles after taking over from Jose, who left us in a terrible state. He just needs time. You can't possibly expect him to get top 4 without 4 or 5 transfer windows.

He's like Dutch Van Der Linde, he has a plan, he just needs time and money. Where is your god damn faith?

Fantastic?
 
There you go, delusion at it finest.

And that's why some fans will never see sense, they think managing is unimportant.

I have to repeat this here, we have a poster here claiming Sir Alex Ferguson or Jörgen Klopp would maybe not, or not, do a better job than OGS at United this season.

Am I supposed to counter this? You're making stuff up. You seem to come to conclusions based on very little evidence
 
Why do you belive OGS does not have a plan? Anything he said or done. There is no style? Based on what, not winning enough? There's obviously a game plan. Successful or not. Look at the squad. He can hardly field an XI every game compareable to anyone in the top 4. We're 5th.

Spurs can't be counted? Come on..

Chelsea are excused because of the transfer ban? Why, their squad is so much worse then ours? What about Wolves and Sheffield?

I believe that because we have been to SU, Newcastle, West Ham, Watford, Arsenal, Bournemouth, Southampton and got battered off the park in all of those games. How many teams have we played off the park? None.

That is his fault too for not not getting enough players in.

Spurs can be counted, they having a terrible season in 4 and not far from us.

Chelsea are 5 points ahead of us, given that at the start of the season even you would have doubted their squad.

SU and Wolves are not struggling.

What makes you think he has a plan? In my opinion he is a media puppet and one who is hypocritical.
 
There is absolutely no reason to give Ole time. You can give time if you see some direction, some goal, or some style that needs time or players to be successful, simply you can give some time if theres a work that needs to be finished. But thats not Ole´s case at all.

We have absolutly no style of play, our defence for 200 mil. dollars doesnt work at all, our midfield simply doesnt exist, our forwards are like day and night and theres nothing to build on. Are we trying to press? Or are we playing in a deep block? Are we attacking through full backs, through short passes, crosses, are we trying to play with pivot? What is our prefered formation? 433, 532, 4231, 4141? What is our prefered or strongest starting XI? Why is Lingard still playing? Why is Lindelof still up there? What is actually our goal this season? What is the 3 years plan Ole still talks about?

This just doesnt work and we are losing time and money.
 
So he's only halfway there, and we have improved, we are 5th. He needs at least 6 transfer windows to get us top 4.

We finished 2nd, and 5th the season before. What improvement is there?

Have we scored more goals? conceded less? we are at the same level we were a year ago when he took over.

6 windows to get top 4? you must be joking. Rodgers as got Leicester challenging in 1 window.

Pep took 2 windows to build a title winning team

Chelsea will probably challenge with 2 windows.

6 windows to challenge for top 4? So what we will need 6 years to challenge for the title?

Talk about ambition.
 
Am I supposed to counter this? You're making stuff up. You seem to come to conclusions based on very little evidence

Nope, there's nothing to counter. Your opinion is that 2 of the best managers we've seen, both CL winning and multiple league winning managers couldn't do better than Ole with this United side.

It's your opinion, you need not counter.
 
Finishing 4th is only a commercial objective. It's not indicative of improving and progressing toward challenging for the league. Just ask Arsenal about how all those top 4s meant anything in regard to it being a stepping stone to winning titles. It just stacks the coffers.

They have only one way of playing that's been moderately successful in a fluky kind of way, and that's to counterattack. That's not getting you anywhere near wining leagues or CLs.

31 points after 21 games would put you around

9th in 2009
7th in 2010
8th in 2011
8th in 2012
9th in 2013
9th in 2014
8th in 2015
8th in 2016
8th in 2017
7th in 2018

What a plan!
 
Last edited:
Finishing 4th is only a commercial objective. It's not indicative of improving and progressing toward challenging for the league. Just ask Arsenal about how all those top 4s meant anything in regard to being competitive amongst the elite. It just stacks the coffers.

They have only one of playing that's been moderately successful in a fluky kind of way, and that's to counterattack. That's not getting you anywhere near wining leagues or CLs.

What is the actual point of getting top 4 if we wont even get out the group stages is the Champions League. Pointless.
 
We finished 2nd, and 5th the season before. What improvement is there?

Have we scored more goals? conceded less? we are at the same level we were a year ago when he took over.

6 windows to get top 4? you must be joking. Rodgers as got Leicester challenging in 1 window.

Pep took 2 windows to build a title winning team

Chelsea will probably challenge with 2 windows.

6 windows to challenge for top 4? So what we will need 6 years to challenge for the title?

Talk about ambition.
Think you need to find a pinch of salt.
 
Maybe my english, but are you saying the manager, OGS, does not have a plan? Then, do you really belive that? A $3-4billion company, apoints a manager, after three failed ones and goes, hey, novice, you go right ahead, do as you please.

In a league where Arsenal, Tottenham, Chelsea and some would argue City are all struggeling. You are saying this squad, MUFC's squad, is good enough to do better then what we've seen?
No I am saying our manager is bang average, newbie.

And given it is being averaged by an average manager of course the team can do better. You know, if it was being managed well and all that. Alien concept, I know.
 
The worst thing is I don’t think we’ll even sack him at the end of the season if we fail to finish top 4 which has been the remit for all previous managers.
 
Counterattacking moves are undeniably exciting but one of the biggest names in football should really be dominating matches, not relying on counterpunches because the team is too inept and unskilled to dominate others.
 
The worst thing is I don’t think we’ll even sack him at the end of the season if we fail to finish top 4 which has been the remit for all previous managers.

I think Ole has a remit of finishing in top half.

Convince the fans all is looking good for the future, not deliver next season being 15th at Christmas get sacked and the same follows for the new manager.
 
I believe that because we have been to SU, Newcastle, West Ham, Watford, Arsenal, Bournemouth, Southampton and got battered off the park in all of those games. How many teams have we played off the park? None.

That is his fault too for not not getting enough players in.

Spurs can be counted, they having a terrible season in 4 and not far from us.

Chelsea are 5 points ahead of us, given that at the start of the season even you would have doubted their squad.

SU and Wolves are not struggling.

What makes you think he has a plan? In my opinion he is a media puppet and one who is hypocritical.

Not many teams have batterd us off the park. We've won convincingly in a few games.

Maybe it's his fault. Maybe not all his fault. Maybe part of a plan. Maybe many things. Money, type of player, etc etc

I'm not impressed with Chelseas squad. But even me? I don't know. I think they have a better squad then we do.

SU and Wolves are doing fine. No one expected more from them I belive.

If you want, read what I wrote earlier. I don't know, go further back if you're really into it.
He'll need a set team to have a set system to play. We mostly play a version of 4-3-3. He's talked about high pressing, intensity, fast attacking/counter-attacking play, full backs involved, etc. I don't know when his "master plan" will come to fruition. This team needs time. The avg. age of our first XI is something like 23-24. He can barely field a full team where anyone on here would agree the team is up to MUFC standards. One injury and we struggle. Two or three, we have no chance. Add to that players need to rest during the season.

Who's comparing OGS to SAF?

Sure previous managers have got rid of deadwood, just to replace them with more deadwood. You wanted Ole to keep Fellaini, Smalling, Lukaku? I belive most wanted them gone. He should have replace them? Yes. But a player cost today is 50mill+. Is a lot of money. He don't seem to be buying just for the sake of buying. We don't know everything happening behind the scene.

He has put faith in youngsters this season. Maybe he should have done it more, maybe less. I don't know.

Possibly. But what I belive myself to be doing is trying really hard to see the other side. Ole out, it's clear as day, he's not fit to be our manager, he has no plan, Lingard, Lukaku and Smalling, Cardiff, he said this and that, etc, etc.

There's obviously a plan. Re signings, style of play, youth, squad, probably communication even. The 'Ole out's' on here can most likely guess on the type of players we're looking to sign for this team. And who is most likely not to be a part of the team come next season. You/they might not agree on every player we in the end buy or sell, but there seem to be a plan in place.

This squad is not better then what we see. He should play Matic more? Or Mata, Jones, some prospect? Lingard should not play? Sure, that might all be. There will always be something not good enough. We should not have sold X player without replaceing him. Sure. Maybe. I don't know who makes that final decission. I'm guessing not one person alone. I wish we had better players right now as well.

May be in the end he is not the man for the job. But from what I have seen so far, from very good to very bad, I can not say that OGS is the reason we are not doing better. He and the club has to rectify many mistakes been done before OGS was given the job.

"media puppet and one who is hypocritical", Based on what?
 
I think Ole has a remit of finishing in top half.

Convince the fans all is looking good for the future, not deliver next season being 15th at Christmas get sacked and the same follows for the new manager.

Yep, standards are slowly dropping year after year and there’s people out there trying to convince us it’s progress.
 
He's just had to play Fred for 360 minutes over the festive period without rest because he has feck all else to rotate in midfield but sure call him a novice, inept or whatever else while he's being kneecapped at every step by a collection of clowns behind the scenes.
 
No I am saying our manager is bang average, newbie.

And given it is being averaged by an average manager of course the team can do better. You know, if it was being managed well and all that. Alien concept, I know.

Very good. I got nothing.
 
Not many teams have batterd us off the park. We've won convincingly in a few games.

Maybe it's his fault. Maybe not all his fault. Maybe part of a plan. Maybe many things. Money, type of player, etc etc

I'm not impressed with Chelseas squad. But even me? I don't know. I think they have a better squad then we do.

SU and Wolves are doing fine. No one expected more from them I belive.

If you want, read what I wrote earlier. I don't know, go further back if you're really into it.

"media puppet and one who is hypocritical", Based on what?


I think you will see that SU, West Ham, Bournemouth, Arsenal played us off the park. We have not done that to any team this season.

Yes you have made valid points earlier but I feel he is out of his depth.

Hypocritical? he wants his team to run the most? do we no?
 
He's just had to play Fred for 360 minutes over the festive period without rest because he has feck all else to rotate in midfield but sure call him a novice, inept or whatever else while he's being kneecapped at every step by a collection of clowns behind the scenes.
He has been, but he knew two midfielder had gone and did not kick up a fuss when he didn't get new ones in. He is protecting his job, but putting it in jeopardy at the same time.
 
Yep, standards are slowly dropping year after year and there’s people out there trying to convince us it’s progress.

Exactly, one poster responded saying he needs 6 transfer windows to compete for top 4. That should say it all.

He's just had to play Fred for 360 minutes over the festive period without rest because he has feck all else to rotate in midfield but sure call him a novice, inept or whatever else while he's being kneecapped at every step by a collection of clowns behind the scenes.

We call him that because:

Poga did not need to start the league cup game in September
Rashford, Martial v Colchester too. He does not know how to rotate players like other managers.
 
He has been, but he knew two midfielder had gone and did not kick up a fuss when he didn't get new ones in. He is protecting his job, but putting it in jeopardy at the same time.

Sure he's inexperienced but this is why other clubs have capable DoFs to guide managers from making such mistakes.
 
Exactly, one poster responded saying he needs 6 transfer windows to compete for top 4. That should say it all.



We call him that because:

Poga did not need to start the league cup game in September
Rashford, Martial v Colchester too. He does not know how to rotate players like other managers.

He has feck all to rotate with, which was my initial point. This is one of the weakest squads in recent memory for any big club.
 
I think you will see that SU, West Ham, Bournemouth, Arsenal played us off the park. We have not done that to any team this season.

Yes you have made valid points earlier but I feel he is out of his depth.

Hypocritical? he wants his team to run the most? do we no?

Very well, you might be correct. I don't know.

We have ran a lot in some games. But look at our squad. We won't do that game after game. Most of that stuff is trained and worked at during the off season. And we need a stronger squad and capable players for those tactics.
 
Very well, you might be correct. I don't know.

We have ran a lot in some games. But look at our squad. We won't do that game after game. Most of that stuff is trained and worked at during the off season. And we need a stronger squad and capable players for those tactics.

I agree the squad is thin, but that begs the question why are we not doing everything we can to get players in? Surely the manager should have enough about him to say to Ed I need players urgently.

It took Liverpool 1 week to sort the Minamino deal, prior to the window opening.

We have known this squad is thin for months, especially in CM. Everyone knows Pogba could leave, why not identify targets and get them in early doors?
 
Sure he's inexperienced but this is why other clubs have capable DoFs to guide managers from making such mistakes.
He's been a manager for ten years. Frank Lampard is inexperienced. Ole's problem is he is not good enough for a top job, which is why he was at Cardiff and Molde. He is grasping at the past, when that has gone and he doesn't know how to manage in the modern age.

He is desperately trying to build his CO92, except he wants to buy most of them in and they are nowhere near the level of the CO92.
 
Nothing misleading about it. It's only correct to point out that absymal statistic. If a team loses 20 PL games on the bounce nobody would begrudge the media from citing that form /run begging for the prior form to also be included.
Oh yes there is. Here's the actual stats:
During Solskjaer’s first 50 games in charge, United have 24 wins, 12 draws and 14 defeats in all competitions.
Therefore, the Norwegian has a win rate of 48% and a loss rate of 28%. That’s also the worst win rate of any United manager since Dave Sexton was in charge between 1977 and 1981.
In comparison, Mourinho had 27 wins, 10 draws and 13 defeats in his final 50 games as United manager.
This means that the 56-year-old actually had a better record in his last 50 games, with a win rate of 54% and a loss rate of 26%.
But I mean why stop there? If we're being sensationalist why not just say "Solskjaer has a 0% win rate this year". At least make an agenda clear if you're going to mislead people.
 
That doesn't include his interim run, that's only full time results.

There's enough shit to beat the manager with at the moment, lets not use misleading stats to make stuff up as well.
I know what the stat is and I don’t believe it is misleading. Since being given the job, Ole has managed the team less successfully than he did at Cardiff.
 
I agree the squad is thin, but that begs the question why are we not doing everything we can to get players in? Surely the manager should have enough about him to say to Ed I need players urgently.

It took Liverpool 1 week to sort the Minamino deal, prior to the window opening.

We have known this squad is thin for months, especially in CM. Everyone knows Pogba could leave, why not identify targets and get them in early doors?

I agree. We should have had more options in midfield. But there is no evidence this is on OGS alone. But the money involved, the importance to finally get things right. Probably many factors we don't know.
 
He has feck all to rotate with, which was my initial point. This is one of the weakest squads in recent memory for any big club.

Garner, Gomez, Williams could have all played in League Cup games. He's sanctioning the offloading of chunks of the midfield and attack force, expecting Ed Woodward to complete 6 transfers in one window??? There are just so many layers to his incompetence. The standards are so low that people think we had a good last window. Liverpool, City, Arsenal, Chelsea, Spurs are not spending 15 million on championship players. We were in competition with Leeds for James.
 
Oh yes there is. Here's the actual stats:

But I mean why stop there? If we're being sensationalist why not just say "Solskjaer has a 0% win rate this year". At least make an agenda clear if you're going to mislead people.
So Ole has the worst win rate in nearly 40 years :lol:

So what's his win rate as permanant manager? That's as relevant a statistic as any other one.

And you're painfully wrong yet again. Ole having a 0% win rate this calendar year would be based on one football match and hence not very important. Ole having a pathetic win record since being appointed permanant manager would be extremely important given it would spread over 7-8 months which is clearly a material portion of time. Sadly you're highlighting your own agenda here at being so overly sensitige and defensive over an obviously relevant and meaningful statistic that shows up our managers non-peformance. The only reason it's supposedly 'misleading' is becuase it goes against your view. It's like a manager finishing 19th performing terribly and people pointing to the 10 games he had in the previous season demanding it also be taken into account.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.