- Joined
- May 10, 2009
- Messages
- 37,305
Maybe it’s no coincidence that our recruiting was also bad before Mourinho.
Because we hired one more washed up manager.
Maybe it’s no coincidence that our recruiting was also bad before Mourinho.
Because we hired one more washed up manager.
In reality, Woodward is the actual travesty.
Think it is best if we end it here.
Michael Edwards was getting lot of shit before Klopp joined (or just when he joined), with fans complaining he has signed duds. They work with Klopp, discuss transfers and work as a team instead of throwing shit at each other in the media. Klopp created such an atmosphere that everyone gives so much to the team now. Everyone wants to be part of that, that's what manager should do.
If manager is good, everything falls in place. Somehow Liverpool, City, Spurs all started to sign good players once they hired very good managers.
Do you disagree that manager picks the player whom we sign? I mean we don't get every target but hard to think of any player signed without manager's approval.
So tell me why didn't we get rid of Alexis and Lukaku earlier so we have time to get at least one replacement?
Selling him now agree PL window is closed is downright daft.
All of those players were not shifted by him. He didn't take us forward, he's to blame for the mess as much as Moyes and Mourinho. Rojo and Darmian are still here. He basically squandered money. Bought over the hill Falcao and Schweini.
Might or might not. We have problems with scoring goals as it is and what do we do, cut our striker force even more.
Funny how Mourinho is blamed on the wage structure, money spent, yet compared to other managers they have no part in the process.
The board is the same since the day Moyes was appointed. So you either take all managers accountable for the transfer business or none of them.
Jose wanted Maguire and bunch of other players on the back of 2nd place finish and 2 cups the season before - he was doing something right.
Again how is he blamed on the wage structure yet other managers are not? He wanted Sanchez, but so did City, that doesn't mean he can sign off half a million in wages to get him. That's what the board do. Jose like Moyes, LvG and Ole is not the negotiator when it comes to value and signing players, so I ask again how you can blame the wage structure and signings on single manager and not on all, give than the same board operated in all cases?
You can blame the manager for those who he identified, but not for the value he bought him for or the wages they are on - that's not his business. No manager has 100% record, not even Fergie.
That is also correct. It is plain wrong to put the whole mess only on one person, especially for the things he didn't even directly influence. But, I guess it is easier to look at things that way.
If we keep playing 4-2-3-1 then we should sign proper #10 like Bruno who can create chances. Maddison will be good too but don't think we will sign him considering the asking price.
I think he pretty much guaranteed that he won't be in the plans for next season without replacement in mind. All I'm saying is he could've handled it better if we are to bring no replacement in his place.Really? Ole played Lukaku 23 times for a total of 1362 minutes. He wasn't a guaranteed starter no but most definitely a member of the first team.
I think he pretty much guaranteed that he won't be in the plans for next season without replacement in mind. All I'm saying is he could've handled it better if we are to bring no replacement in his place.
As I've said it depends of what the board has promised him previously. Mourinho is known for his style long before he was brought in here. Whether he's not or is very good depending on his methods is debatable, however his trophy haul speaks for itself.Thing is, if a manager has to break transfer records EVERY SINGLE SEASON to produce acceptable results, then that manager isn't very good.
Let's note that even in 2018, Mourinho still got a young talented full-back and a 50M central midfielder on top of a squad that had finished second and did not lose a single important player. Justifying his utter and absolute collapse with "he wasn't backed" is disingenuous: it would have been perfectly reasonable to expect that the team remains solid, hard to beat, and fights for top 3. Instead we were 11 points behind Chelsea when he got the sack.
He won 2 cups in the first season and got CL qualification. That was the best season we had post Fergie. Not calling it progress is disingenuous mate.Why stop there, also point out he took over 5th placed team, finished 6th in first season.
Progress is not just getting results. Jose did that and that's why it was not sustainable whereas the work did by Klopp is. Funny how second best team in the country went downhill so fast just because one CB was not signed.
Did the other managers oversee a 46% increase in wage structure? Nope.
Of course the manager would be involved in part with transfers, its short sighted and daft to believe the manager isn't made aware of how signing X player impacts the financials in building their team.
He did far more wrong, than right.
What about our woeful player fitness levels?
What about player power?
What about his own unprofessional, embarrassing, child like tantrums?
They say a team mirrors their managers attitude, is it any fecking wonder we had our players openly mock the club through social media throughout his tenure and the day he walked into the club?
What about his demands to keep sub par players like Darmian and Fellaini? The latter of whom who conducted an interview saying "Jose made it easy for me to demand what I did"?
I'd gladly give up 2nd place finishes (19 pts adrift BTW, the largest 2nd place finish in PL history) and our two B Cups if it meant some professionalism, structure and long term identity.
Actually you can.
The manager would obviously be made aware of the financial impact it would have on transfer budget. Jose clearly demanded Pogba throughout his debut summer transfer window and the club delivered him. Likewise with Sanchez and he knew well the financial impact that would have going forward.
Similarly, look at all the public quotes from Jose regarding his demands that Fellaini be kept.
If Jose is demanding Fellaini be kept and the board show support and deliver on that, who is to blame?
A) The manager demanding X player be signed / resigned
B) The board simply showing support to the manager
I asked this time and time again in the Woodward thread and most avoid answering it cause they know well its very much on the manager as well.
I'd agree it is solely wrong to blame a single person, yet you and many others thought it perfectly acceptable to single out Woodward on his thread, didn't you?
Just to note, the manager does indeed influence transfer spend and wage structure.
Gave a perfectly fine example above how a manager is involved and influences it.
The board have to be seen to be supporting their manager, so if a manager demands an expensive addition, then surely that's on the manager as much if not more so than the board who are simply delivering the target?
Except Mourinho was given a lot more money to fix that (net spend).
Thank you! Finally a post that doesn't make me want to jump out a window!Now Smalling to Roma on loan, have to say, although it will take a year or two, I am loving Ole's working getting rid of the shit, about god dam time!! So many managers have been "ah we will give you another chance, you might come good".
Finally a manager who has realised, nope you are shit, out!
Sanchez, Smalling, Lukaku, Valencia all gone, Jones, Darmian, Rojo nowhere near a match day squad, Young, Matic obviously been told no longer starting 11 and I would think will be gone next summer.
Yes we are relying on kids at the moment, yes our squad is wafer thin, yes this season may well be a struggle but I love the fact that Ole has the balls to say, these need going, in 2/3 transfer windows we are going to have a squad with young hungry talented players who want to be at the club, hopefully playing high paced, fast, pressing, attacking football.
Reminds me of Pep when he went in at City, bombed off Hart and 12+ other players because they did not fit his style and took time assembling a squad to get there where they are now.
No more quick fixes, it seems that Ole has a plan and it will take time to execute it but feck me finally a bit of a structure seems to be in place.
Rome was not built in a day!
Ole out? Do me a favour!
Thank you! Finally a post that doesn't make me want to jump out a window!
Now Smalling to Roma on loan, have to say, although it will take a year or two, I am loving Ole's working getting rid of the shit, about god dam time!! So many managers have been "ah we will give you another chance, you might come good".
Finally a manager who has realised, nope you are shit, out!
Sanchez, Smalling, Lukaku, Valencia all gone, Jones, Darmian, Rojo nowhere near a match day squad, Young, Matic obviously been told no longer starting 11 and I would think will be gone next summer.
Yes we are relying on kids at the moment, yes our squad is wafer thin, yes this season may well be a struggle but I love the fact that Ole has the balls to say, these need going, in 2/3 transfer windows we are going to have a squad with young hungry talented players who want to be at the club, hopefully playing high paced, fast, pressing, attacking football.
Reminds me of Pep when he went in at City, bombed off Hart and 12+ other players because they did not fit his style and took time assembling a squad to get there where they are now.
No more quick fixes, it seems that Ole has a plan and it will take time to execute it but feck me finally a bit of a structure seems to be in place.
Rome was not built in a day!
Ole out? Do me a favour!
We should probably be looking for Maddison like talent in Championship anyway. That's why I like James signing so much, we finally started shopping in the lower league where there's a lot of very good talent to be bought.
We should probably be looking for Maddison like talent in Championship anyway. That's why I like James signing so much, we finally started shopping in the lower league where there's a lot of very good talent to be bought.
Very true, all the games we've won recently, we've scored first. Rarely do we turn it around these days after conceding first or if the opposition equalise. That definitely needs to be addressed!The one problem I see this year is mentality.
I think this team is very fragile and weak mentally.
The reason I think that is, other than the PSG result, as soon as we get pegged back to 1 - 1 or go a goal down we struggle to turn the game around in our favour.
Does anyone know why this might be?
Very true, all the games we've won recently, we've scored first. Rarely do we turn it around these days after conceding first or if the opposition equalise. That definitely needs to be addressed!
I'd agree it is solely wrong to blame a single person, yet you and many others thought it perfectly acceptable to single out Woodward on his thread, didn't you?
Under Olé Gunnar Solskjær, Manchester United's xG/game is the highest it has been in 5 years
https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comments/cwy6td/under_olé_gunnar_solskjær_manchester_uniteds/
Pep spent ton of money to replace those 12+ players mate.
I'd be happy to get rid of the duds but only if we bring in replacements.
You have to have better squad all the time, or at least aim at that. Missing couple of years of CL would mean no top player will come to us unless we stuff him with money - and this is what we're trying to avoid.
Next year if we finish outside top 4, no one out of Sancho or Dybala or the likes will care that we're cleaning the deadwood. They will see only a team that is seriously off the pace in the most competitive league in the world with a rookie manager where the most compelling part is money and wages..
What we're doing has nothing to do with what Pep did. He spent nearly a billion to bring in probably 30 players during his reign, we have brought in 3 so far.
The one problem I see this year is mentality.
I think this team is very fragile and weak mentally.
The reason I think that is, other than the PSG result, as soon as we get pegged back to 1 - 1 or go a goal down we struggle to turn the game around in our favour.
Does anyone know why this might be?
Obviously confidence. When they come up against any sort of adversity, the team lack the belief that they can overcome it. This has been a problem for some time, of course, and not something that's specific to Ole and this team. But it's an issue that isn't going to be fixed easily.
Fantastic post, and the boldened is a particularly enlightening read.People have been talking from the pov of football, but I just want to mention a more subconscious side that has seen Ole so nonchalantly disrespected by the fans and the media and his contributions under-appreciated. Everyone can see Ole is slightly in the introvert spectrum from his shy demeanor in his press conferences and interviews (not sure if it's him or that because English is not his first language). I have seen many examples of that in the workplace whether it be business or academia. People under these sort of characters have more respect for them, but people superior or people from outside looking in always have the feeling (consciously or subconsciously) they can bully them. I have seen United fans here call him a "clown", "puppet", "norwegian level manager", "incompetent" etc etc. I have seen the pundits/journos call him "weak", "has no control", "sacked before christmas" etc. Do these people have any clue what's going on in the dressing room, what's going on in the training or even how much control he has on transfers? No. I can guarantee you, if Ole spoke with the arrogance and confidence of lets say Jose but with the same results and performance as Ole, he won't be getting this level of disrespect in both the fanbase and the media.
Let's just take Lampard for an example considering both Ole and Lampard are around the same level right now. Lampard always looks very confident and well-spoken in the media. And now let's look at his results and performance in three games. Ole has the 3rd best xG and the best xGA in the league i.e 3rd most chances created and the least number of chances created against us. Whereas Lampard has 9-10th best xG and XGA (https://understat.com/league/EPL ). So I was quite shocked to hear the same pundits/journos and people here that is disrespecting Ole, now calling Lampard "will be great for Chelsea", "I like Lampard as a manager", etc after a close win against Norwich.
So, I think Ole public-facing shy demeanor plays some part in the level of disrespect he seems to be getting everywhere whether it be consciously or subconciously.
Even during Ole's great run, we beat teams by scoring first. Under Jose, we came back from a goal down a few time.
younger = less tolerance to frustration. In our case is visible. Ole needs to pay more attention to psychological coaching. Klopp, Poch, and Guardiola especially good at mentality building. Seriously good.
Hope OGS takes that into account. A good run of games will also help.
The one thing you can't say is that he doesn't have a vision.
He is getting rid of players he does want or refusing to play them no matter the cost to the season.
I have said all along I am willing to accept being out of the top four if
As long that those three are happening I will be more than patient.
- The young players get as my h game time as possible.
- He has a clear tactical aggressive playing strategy
- He gets rid or refuses to play the proven duds.
Going through old Jose threads for entertainment I realized that I got married on the day of his signature at United. And still am. Me 1 - Jose 0
I don’t think it’s because we are always trying to get the best players,I think all the top clubs in England are trying to get the best players.Its because 1)Our Scouting department is nowhere close to the other big clubs in the country.2)Not having a DOF and a proper structure around the managers means that we are jumping from one extreme to the other every couple of years...Over the last 5 years we”ve gone from possesion based football with technical,physically small players to big strong players who can counterattack to young British talent with speed in the final third...Probably because we are obsessed with always going for the best and paying over the odds. That ends with us having to ignore other areas and having to play players in unfamiliar positions.
We seem to want to go for players who want to spend their whole careers here. Just get really good players who are specialists in specific positions. Keep them if they are a success, or else move them on for better players. At least they will be a relative success if played in their natural position and we can get decent money for them. A lesser player will be several times better than a world-class player if the lesser one is playing in a natural position and world-class player is not.
There were players like Ziyech and Partey who we could have got relatively cheap and would have fixed major issues in the right wing and midfield. But we wanted unattainable ones like Sancho and Longstaff and seemingly willing to wait for them to come.
Likes of City never seem to pay stupid fees like we have chucked out in recent times. They go for specialists for the role even if they are somewhat lesser players than their main target. We get Pogba and play him as DM, Mata as right winger, Young as full back, even going as far back as Fergie when we played Jones in midfield. These middle tier players always seem to elude us for some reason.