Ole Gunnar Solskjær | 2021/22 Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Of course. But you can only tell if they'e being made to look good or poor relative to how good you think they should be, or "really are". So that's as much a problem for your position as it is for mine mate.

Not really. I'm saying that super structured coaching allied with talented individuals is behind both Liverpool and City's success in recent seasons. We may or may not have good enough individuals. That's hard to judge independently of the manager. But we certainly don't have that kind of very structured coaching, and that's easy to judge independently of the quality of the players.
 
Persisting with a 4-2-3-1 with Pogba as a DM surely has to be considered criminal at this point given how he's generally performed when Ole has pushed him further forward. Even now, shoehorning him onto the left wing and Rashford onto the right just so that we can accomodate the formation seems like a huge waste, especially when we can just play both Pogba and Rashford in their natural positions with a different formation.

It's little things like that which makes one doubt if Ole is really getting the maximum he can out of the squad of players already.

The thing is we can't play 4-3-3 as Bruno is a #10 and we don't have a midfielder capable of sitting in a single pivot with 2 such attacking players ahead of him, and in truth even Pep no longer plays so open in midfield as we'd have to with Pogba and Bruno ahead of a holder. For some reason we've never used the Juventus blueprint to get the best from Pogba and at this point one of Bruno/Pogba/Rashford won't be here within a year imo and I think we all know which of the 3 that'll be.
 
Scraps :lol:
He’s overseen spending of around 310m euros on new players.
Not sure that’s “scraps” in any sense of the word. He has overseen a much better transfer strategy from the club though, no doubt.
Yes, scraps. Smalling being sold to Roma paid for Telles. Lukaku being sold to Inter paid for Maguire.

Unlike Jose, and to a lesser extent LvG, Ole is having to cut his cloth accordingly.
 
If you're calling what Ole has had "scraps", whether in the past or now, I'm not really gonna argue this any further.
If you're going to take one sentence out of context and ignore the rest of a pretty considerate post to your argument, then yeah, it's probably for the best that we don't engage in a conversation.
 
I dont think so, not entirely. A better squad would help of course. But there's a certain sense of routine and formula missing in our play. I don't like to overstate the issue of coaching because I think that gets overdone for Ole. You cant get to where we are in the league without being a decent coach. But City and Liverpool have raised the bar for title winners and there's a good chance it'll be back to a high level again next season. Basically the title winners nowaways will win 17 or 18 home games and maybe 14 or 15 away games. Personally I think you can only get that kind of absurd consistency by having the kind of hyper-drilled teams we see in modern football. Ole isnt that kind of coach by any means.
I think you're looking for something that isn't there IMO.

Every manager needs the players to carry out his/her vision. Look at Liverpool now under Klopp because just one or two cogs of that machine are missing. Then, compare that machine to what Ole has had to deal with: an imbalanced mess of a squad that is still predominantly comprised of players who came under the previous four managers before him, and who hasn't had the chance to bring in the players he wants to replace the players he's had to sell, as well as resolving the clear personnel issues that have been longstanding for over 5 years (RW, for example). We have four clear weaknesses in the outfield playing XI (CB partner for Maguire, RW, DM to free up Pogba, and a Striker) who need a proper first team upgrade. At least two of those players should have been brought in last summer and they weren't. Those four weaknesses are almost half of the entire outfield XI.

Which brings me back to my original point: Klopp is currently way outside CL qualification and only has his two first choice CBs out. Why is Ole (who has four massive areas he's been wanting sorted for the last 2 years) being held to a higher standard than the manager who is clearly a level or two above him?

EDIT - And moreover, shouldn't credit be given to the manager who a) has us in 2nd despite not getting any first team reinforcements, b) has had to play more games than anyone post-lockdown and up until last week, didn't even have the courtesy of a single week off all season? Compare that to Klopp, who at one point had 9 days between games this season...
 
With the finances involved in signing players nowadays there is never any chance that a club will be able to solve all of its problems in one or even two summers. I don't think we can complain about what has been provided to Ole in terms of players. With how this squad looked going into last summers window it was always going to be a smart move to add various 'squad' players over one expensive star. Obviously Donny and Telles have failed to become key players for various reasons, but I still feel that we did the right thing.

The key point to consider here, and its something that was mentioned this time last year by me and many others, is that this team still had a lot of potential to improve organically, and we did improve. I think we will also be better again next season even if nothing changes at all this summer, but obviously our chances of being able to win the big ones will be improved by adding two starting quality players.

As we near the end of this season we are still on track with the progress that Ole backers have always been hoping to see. Back to back top 4 finishes should not be undervalued in this league, and we have it done this one comfortably which people shouldn't take for granted now its real, or try to caveat this accomplishment with talk about what other teams have or haven't done. We took care of business regardless. Winning the Europa suddenly feels quite crucial. Not for Oles future because it seems secure, but this team will obviously benefit from lifting a cup together.
I dunno, I was one of those who felt we'd improve naturally this season (I even made a thread back in September on it which many ridiculed) but I do think 3rd is about the absolute maximum we'll reach with this squad and a starting midfield of McFred (and I don't mean that to denigrate them - they're top professionals and wholly committed to the team and the cause, but they are players who should be squad players in a proper title challenging team). If, as I think is possible, Liverpool and City really flex their muscles, and Spurs and maybe Arsenal get some players in, I think we're going to be left behind no matter what improvements we get from the players who are already here. Tuchel with the players Chelsea already have is going to be a massive challenge too, and that's before we consider the likes of Wolves, Leicester and Everton who will also spend wisely.

Ole and the team needs at least two of the clear holes in the squad fixing - and one of them has to be a RW. If we don't get those holes fixed, we're going to be screwed and will undoubtedly be in a fight for Top 4. The likes of Amad, Garner, Mejbri, Mengi, Pellistri, Laird etc are still a year, maybe even two, away from being proper options in the squad and even then they aren't guarantees. Bring in those players and the squad improves overnight, IMO.
 
I was actually talking about the whole 2 seasons in charge as opposed to the Leeds game specifically. When evaluating Ole's 2 seasons I think his regular refusal to make changes and the crap football are the 2 biggest aspects of the con side, overall the pros outweigh them for now.



I think it has more to do with his lack of trust in Axel or Bailly at the back, meaning we have to play deeper to protect the slow CB pairing, and in midfield Ole really doesn't trust Pogba in the double pivot most of the time so we are stuck playing 2 mediocre workhorses who starve our front 4 of decent ball.
In the latter instance I feel Ole's caution is justified as Pogba isn't suited to the double pivot and it's not Ole's fault that his options in there are McFred, but his refusal to pair Maguire with Axel or Bailly regularly is a choice that just doesn't make sense.
The problem with Bailly and Axel has been their unavailability due to injury. Axel has seemingly gotten over his issues, but we are now seeing the impact of those periods out of the game have had on him. He lacks the sharpness of regular game time and unfortunately has regressed. Bailly meanwhile, just can't be trusted to stay fit. I don't blame Ole for not picking him, even though I do feel when fit, he is our second best defender and undoubtedly the CB that suits Maguire the most. The best ability is availability, and in the case of Maguire and especially Lindelof, that rings true when we compare it to the other two CBs Ole has at his disposal.
 
The problem with Bailly and Axel has been their unavailability due to injury. Axel has seemingly gotten over his issues, but we are now seeing the impact of those periods out of the game have had on him. He lacks the sharpness of regular game time and unfortunately has regressed. Bailly meanwhile, just can't be trusted to stay fit. I don't blame Ole for not picking him, even though I do feel when fit, he is our second best defender and undoubtedly the CB that suits Maguire the most. The best ability is availability, and in the case of Maguire and especially Lindelof, that rings true when we compare it to the other two CBs Ole has at his disposal.

With Bailly it's been up and down i agree but even when he played well he was straight back to the bench next game, and if Ole feels this way then why have we given him a new contract? Unfortunately I think we know the reason for that. I feel he's to blame for Axel though, he simply hasn't given him a run of games and even the 2 he came in cold for and played well, he was still dropped next game, and this isn't just a Lindelof problem, the whole thing of Maguire playing every game in every competition is stupid, the cups are where he should have rested and Axel gotten several more starts, that was how Fergie used to blood in CB's like Evans, Smalling and Jones.
 
Ole: £279,519,300
Jose: £334,237,500
LVG: £248,490,000


These are the numbers I could find, they are fairly similar, we treat everyone the same.
Hmmmm... LVG and Ole probably spent the same money-wise: £249m and £279£ is pretty much the same when controlled for 5y inflation. Jose is in another league:D

At the same time it’s not right to say LVG and Ole has been treated the same. Prices went crazy from 2016 to 2020; players who costed 50m in 2014-2016 probably costed 75m in 2019-2020.

So I think it’s fair to say the Glazers wanted Ole to prove he was able to improve the team without too much support on the transfer market. No one can argue Ole didn’t past the “test”.

Now it’s definitely time to support Ole and go all in on the transfer market, if we want to take the next step and fight for the PL and CL title.
 
Are players such as Hannibal, Amad, Pellistri included in those transfer / net spend? Probably yes, but they are not going to improve the first team anytime soon.
 
Hmmmm... LVG and Ole probably spent the same money-wise: £249m and £279£ is pretty much the same when controlled for 5y inflation. Jose is in another league:D

At the same time it’s not right to say LVG and Ole has been treated the same. Prices went crazy from 2016 to 2020; players who costed 50m in 2014-2016 probably costed 75m in 2019-2020.

So I think it’s fair to say the Glazers wanted Ole to prove he was able to improve the team without too much support on the transfer market. No one can argue Ole didn’t past the “test”.

Now it’s definitely time to support Ole and go all in on the transfer market, if we want to take the next step and fight for the PL and CL title.
Well in the past year, Poch, Julian and Tuchel have been available, and we stuck with Ole. So Woodward and the owners have pretty much put all their hope on Ole. The only reason to not go for it in the transfer market is because we don't have the money.
 
The bolded ones are questionable(or just plain wrong), but you do bring up a good point. We have been given less than ideal circumstances but we're doing quite well. I think if we could improve our results 5%, possibly by actually strengthening the starting XI, then we are back to being one of the best teams in the world. As in PL title challengers and consistently top 8/4 in the CL.

So yeah, Ole deserves a lot of praise. He's squeezing out results, improving players, off-loading deadwood, focusing on youth and being a ray of sunshine when dealing with the blood-thirsty media. The ball is in the owners' court now. Ole is doing his job more than well enough given his circumstances. This needs to be backed up by some big investments.
If you read between the lines, you will understand that the bold parts might not be my honest belief. I think what I´m trying to say is that, either is Ole a genius, or our players are not as bad as some want us to believe.
 
Since Sir Alex retired, the 2nd placed team has won the subsequent title only one time, and that was Liverpool last season.

I say this to say that league position doesn't always tell the whole story, nor does it guarantee anything in the future. After all we finished 2nd with Mourinho in 17/18 with a fairly average setup, and the concerns then were still valid despite our league position. Last season we finished 3rd with 66 points, 1 match away from 5th, and the concerns about our team were still valid.

Ole hasn't done a bad job, but league position isn't the way to go about showing it. And the concerns you mention are issues which we'll have to address if we are actually serious about winning the title next season.
To be honest, I don´t think Mourinho´s last season at United, or speculation about the future, is much to go about either.

There is of course always room for improvements in form of new signings, but there is also room for improvements within the squad, knowing some of our players are still young and others are just about to enter their prime. I´m actually quite optimistic about next season, even if the summer window fails to meet our expectations.
 
When you are getting the wins people praise everything and when you are second everything is bad.

The key is to make the right new improvements and that is where people disagree and complain about different things.

Some about the manager and other players. I feel it is often the opposite. Some think the manager is the issue and should do more. Others think it is the players that should be better.

In reality it is probably possible to improve and win with better players or a better manager. Also it is possible to improve with the same team as well.
Also it might get worse with the same team as we have seen with Liverpool and buying your way into sucess is not certain to work either.
in the end, no one can deny that we actually have improved quite a bit since Ole took over, so I´d say we should build on that then, instead of speculating in what improvements we could have seen with a different manager. I know you are not Ole´s biggest fan, to say the least, but to replace him now in light of what he actually has achieved this season, is a little crazy.
 
Hmmmm... LVG and Ole probably spent the same money-wise: £249m and £279£ is pretty much the same when controlled for 5y inflation. Jose is in another league:D

At the same time it’s not right to say LVG and Ole has been treated the same. Prices went crazy from 2016 to 2020; players who costed 50m in 2014-2016 probably costed 75m in 2019-2020.

So I think it’s fair to say the Glazers wanted Ole to prove he was able to improve the team without too much support on the transfer market. No one can argue Ole didn’t past the “test”.

Now it’s definitely time to support Ole and go all in on the transfer market, if we want to take the next step and fight for the PL and CL title.
To be fair, you also have to take into account that the last transfer window took place during a pandemic and that the spendings last summer probably would have been a bit higher without it. However, I also think it´s fair to say that we have acted wiser in the transfer marked after Ole took charge. Not all of Ole´s signings have proven to be superb (yet) but I have absolutely no complaints about the signings of Maguire, Bissaka, Fernandes, and IMO, also Telles, while it´s still to early to conclude on van de Beek - but there are certainly hopes for him as well (next season!).
 
in the end, no one can deny that we actually have improved quite a bit since Ole took over, so I´d say we should build on that then, instead of speculating in what improvements we could have seen with a different manager. I know you are not Ole´s biggest fan, to say the least, but to replace him now in light of what he actually has achieved this season, is a little crazy.
Amazing achievement to improve the playing pool whilst cutting down the wage bill to 40 million less than Pool's and 70 million less than PetroCity. Hopefully something can be done in the summer to give Ole the backing he deserves.
 
With the finances involved in signing players nowadays there is never any chance that a club will be able to solve all of its problems in one or even two summers. I don't think we can complain about what has been provided to Ole in terms of players. With how this squad looked going into last summers window it was always going to be a smart move to add various 'squad' players over one expensive star. Obviously Donny and Telles have failed to become key players for various reasons, but I still feel that we did the right thing.

The key point to consider here, and its something that was mentioned this time last year by me and many others, is that this team still had a lot of potential to improve organically, and we did improve. I think we will also be better again next season even if nothing changes at all this summer, but obviously our chances of being able to win the big ones will be improved by adding two starting quality players.

As we near the end of this season we are still on track with the progress that Ole backers have always been hoping to see. Back to back top 4 finishes should not be undervalued in this league, and we have it done this one comfortably which people shouldn't take for granted now its real, or try to caveat this accomplishment with talk about what other teams have or haven't done. We took care of business regardless. Winning the Europa suddenly feels quite crucial. Not for Oles future because it seems secure, but this team will obviously benefit from lifting a cup together.

Agreed with this, but honestly i dont see us challenging City for the league unless they have a really poor season and/or we add more quality on RW/CF.

This season way, way too much of the creative burden have been placed on Rashford and Bruno, with Pogba being on/off injured and Martial having fallen off a cliff form wise. Maybe next season will be Greenwoods big breakthrough, but we cant really rely on that since hes still just a teenager. Basically we need one or two more attcking players who are capable of producing match winning moments for us when we struggle for goals.

IIRC, we have had eight 0-0's this season. If we had Sancho up there this season instead of James/Martial, i am pretty sure we would have won more of those and thus would have been much closer to City right now
 
I'm not making it out to be simple. Just the opposite, I'm saying that simplistic judgments about the quality of the squad are of limited use because the relationship between the players and manager is so interwoven.
Barca after Pep, with Vilanova and Enrique shows that the right group of players will win whoever is managing. Di Matteo at Chelsea, Ranieri at Leicester, Kovac at Bayern... I could go on forever baby.
 
Agreed with this, but honestly i dont see us challenging City for the league unless they have a really poor season and/or we add more quality on RW/CF.

This season way, way too much of the creative burden have been placed on Rashford and Bruno, with Pogba being on/off injured and Martial having fallen off a cliff form wise. Maybe next season will be Greenwoods big breakthrough, but we cant really rely on that since hes still just a teenager. Basically we need one or two more attcking players who are capable of producing match winning moments for us when we struggle for goals.

IIRC, we have had eight 0-0's this season. If we had Sancho up there this season instead of James/Martial, i am pretty sure we would have won more of those and thus would have been much closer to City right now

No I agree, we wont challenge City without strengthening our attacking options.
 
Barca after Pep, with Vilanova and Enrique shows that the right group of players will win whoever is managing. Di Matteo at Chelsea, Ranieri at Leicester, Kovac at Bayern... I could go on forever baby.

So you're saying you've never seen a team play badly under one manager, change manager, then start to play well?
 
Agreed with this, but honestly i dont see us challenging City for the league unless they have a really poor season and/or we add more quality on RW/CF.

This season way, way too much of the creative burden have been placed on Rashford and Bruno, with Pogba being on/off injured and Martial having fallen off a cliff form wise. Maybe next season will be Greenwoods big breakthrough, but we cant really rely on that since hes still just a teenager. Basically we need one or two more attcking players who are capable of producing match winning moments for us when we struggle for goals.

IIRC, we have had eight 0-0's this season. If we had Sancho up there this season instead of James/Martial, i am pretty sure we would have won more of those and thus would have been much closer to City right now

I agree. 3 or 4 goals in those or the 1-1 draw with albion and we are laughing. Its always the difference, those quality players who win you a match with a moment of class when youve played a bit shit in a game. I think we have proved we can beat anyone in a one off match but We just lack the quality in depth over 38 games to come out on top
 
So you're saying you've never seen a team play badly under one manager, change manager, then start to play well?
Of course I'm not saying that. I'm saying with the right players the manager isn't that important and gave a list of competent managers who achieved amazing things because they had amazing players.

Managers can certainly balls things up (Villas Boas at Chelsea) but if you have great squads you basically have to keep things ticking over nicely with a soft touch and things will look after themselves.

Zidane is another perfect example.
 
Hmmmm... LVG and Ole probably spent the same money-wise: £249m and £279£ is pretty much the same when controlled for 5y inflation. Jose is in another league:D

At the same time it’s not right to say LVG and Ole has been treated the same. Prices went crazy from 2016 to 2020; players who costed 50m in 2014-2016 probably costed 75m in 2019-2020.

The inflation is a good point, but they did not spend the same if you take into account income from players sold.

LvGs purchases were to a much greater extent offset by sales. The clearout that's going on now is not bigger compared to what happened at that time. In 14/15, 20 players left United. 8 of them were sold, for a combined income of more than 41 million. The year after, 7 players were sold for a combined 75.5 million. LvGs net spend was quite significantly lower than Oles has been.
 
Of course I'm not saying that. I'm saying with the right players the manager isn't that important and gave a list of competent managers who achieved amazing things because they had amazing players.

Managers can certainly balls things up (Villas Boas at Chelsea) but if you have great squads you basically have to keep things ticking over nicely with a soft touch and things will look after themselves.

Zidane is another perfect example.

So you think any half competent manager could take Guardiola or Klopp's squad of the last few years and repeatedly pull close to 100 points in a season?
 
I'm not making it out to be simple. Just the opposite, I'm saying that simplistic judgments about the quality of the squad are of limited use because the relationship between the players and manager is so interwoven.

Surely you must understand that if that is the case, then it applies equally to simplistic judgments about the quality of the manager?
 
So you think any half competent manager could take Guardiola or Klopp's squad of the last few years and repeatedly pull close to 100 points in a season?

And by the same measure; so you think Guardiola or Klopp could take any other squad in the PL and repeatedly pull close to 100 points in a season?
 
Of course I'm not saying that. I'm saying with the right players the manager isn't that important and gave a list of competent managers who achieved amazing things because they had amazing players.

Managers can certainly balls things up (Villas Boas at Chelsea) but if you have great squads you basically have to keep things ticking over nicely with a soft touch and things will look after themselves.

Zidane is another perfect example.

Just like you would like good players who are good no matter the manager, wouldn't you want a manager who minimizes the importance of individual players as well?
 
Just like you would like good players who are good no matter the manager, wouldn't you want a manager who minimizes the importance of individual players as well?
No, because as we can see with Klopp this season it only takes one bad injury to one important player and that winning machine goes to shit. So even the most team-first managers still need the players to get success. Klopp pre-VVD, Alisson and Fabinho was going nowhere but meandering in a perennial 4th place. Once he added those players, the team was transformed. And I won't even start on Pep who took the most talent-rich squad in the league, spent £180m in his first season and still didn't finish in the top 2. Adds another £180m+ on top and then 'miraculously' wins the league.

We are now at that point with Ole where Klopp was. Give him the tools that he needs to succeed or fail, and then make the judgement call after. If he doesn't quite have it then fair enough, but anyone expecting a proper title challenge from a squad as imbalanced as ours with as many as four clear holes in the first XI, is living in cloud cuckoo land.
 
And by the same measure; so you think Guardiola or Klopp could take any other squad in the PL and repeatedly pull close to 100 points in a season?

No, I clearly said that to you yesterday.

I'm saying that super structured coaching allied with talented individuals is behind both Liverpool and City's success in recent seasons.


Surely you must understand that if that is the case, then it applies equally to simplistic judgments about the quality of the manager?

Well, if someone says its all about the manager not the squad, they'd also be wrong. But I'm not saying anything of the sort.
 
Last edited:
You sure? Took these figures from Transfermarket.com

Manager​
Arrival​
Departure​
Net Spend​
Ole​
€310.58​
€106.78​
€203.80​
Jose​
€466.10​
€123.30​
€342.80​
LVG​
€351.35​
€151.33​
€200.02​

You're actually my favorite poster.

Ole has been around for an additional winter transfer window as well, so his average net spend is actually lower than Van Gaal's!
 
They both won silverware with united, Mourinho twice! Let's not forget we finished second under Mourinho with our first and only 80 plus points haul by the end of the season. LVG was pretty much gone when we won the FA cup but he had a good record against the big clubs (not too different from Solskjaers record). How has Solskjaer proved more?

The difference between LvG/Mourinho on one side and OGS on the other is that the first 2 wanted success short-term without worrying about the long-term. They almost ruined us with their ridiculous spending - whereas OGS has won nothing granted, but he has built a much better foundation which will not collapse like a balloon and need a total rebuild even if things dont work out with him.

So in terms of trophies he hasn't proven more - in terms of creating a United that will stay near the top for the next years, he has proven a lot more
 
You sure? Took these figures from Transfermarket.com

Manager​
Arrival​
Departure​
Net Spend​
Ole​
€310.58​
€106.78​
€203.80​
Jose​
€466.10​
€123.30​
€342.80​
LVG​
€351.35​
€151.33​
€200.02​

That seems like a much too high figure for LvG - should be in the area of 130 million. Mind you, that's counting from the 14/15 season onwards. Maybe that's the discrepancy, on which manager you put the 13/14 transfers (Mata etc)? I can no longer remember exactly when LvG entered the picture there.

But if that's the reason, LvG would still have a much lower annual net spend.
 
You sure? Took these figures from Transfermarket.com

Manager​
Arrival​
Departure​
Net Spend​
Ole​
€310.58​
€106.78​
€203.80​
Jose​
€466.10​
€123.30​
€342.80​
LVG​
€351.35​
€151.33​
€200.02​

Net spend really isnt that important if you don't look at the big picture. If United sign Haaland, Sancho and Rice to take 3 random players - it will look awful on our net spend - but it will also mean you have 3 players in the early 20s who can stay at the club for 10 years - or be sold most likely without a loss.

The problem with esp LvG was that every player he bought had to be sold or released at a great loss financially. For the €200 m OGS has spent we have James (who is 23 and can be sold without a loss), AWB who is 23, Maguire who is 27 and is the captain of our side, Amad (whose value is likely to increase), Bruno (whose value has increased) and DVB (who despite not being a success - still will be worth a fair bit of money)
 
Net spend really isnt that important if you don't look at the big picture. If United sign Haaland, Sancho and Rice to take 3 random players - it will look awful on our net spend - but it will also mean you have 3 players in the early 20s who can stay at the club for 10 years - or be sold most likely without a loss.

The problem with esp LvG was that every player he bought had to be sold or released at a great loss financially. For the €200 m OGS has spent we have James (who is 23 and can be sold without a loss), AWB who is 23, Maguire who is 27 and is the captain of our side, Amad (whose value is likely to increase), Bruno (whose value has increased) and DVB (who despite not being a success - still will be worth a fair bit of money)

It is if what you're discussing is the amount of transfer resources the manager has been given, provided transfer income gets routed back into the transfer budget. Relative to that question, gross transfer outlay is meaningless as a measure.
 
That seems like a much too high figure for LvG - should be in the area of 130 million.

You may disagree with sum of these figures, but they're all on transfermarket. Loan fees included both in and out. The figures are accurate.

Arrivals:
Player​
Club​
Fee​
Anthony Martial​
AS Monaco​
€60.00​
Morgan Schneiderlin​
Southampton FC​
€35.00​
Memphis Depay​
PSV Eindhoven​
€34.00​
Matteo Darmian​
Torino FC​
€18.00​
Bastian Schweinsteiger​
Bayern Munich​
€9.00​
Ángel Di María​
Real Madrid​
€75.00​
Luke Shaw​
Southampton FC​
€37.50​
Ander Herrera​
Athletic Bilbao​
€36.00​
Marcos Rojo​
Sporting CP​
€20.00​
Daley Blind​
Ajax Amsterdam​
€17.50​
Falcao​
AS Monaco​
€7.60​
Vanja Milinković-Savić​
FK Vojvodina Novi Sad​
€1.75​
Departures:
Ángel Di María​
Paris Saint-Germain​
€63.00​
Chicharito​
Bayer 04 Leverkusen​
€12.00​
Jonny Evans​
West Bromwich Albion​
€8.30​
Robin van Persie​
Fenerbahce SK​
€6.50​
Nani​
Fenerbahce SK​
€6.00​
Rafael​
Olympique Lyon​
€3.20​
Ángelo Henríquez​
GNK Dinamo Zagreb​
€1.67​
Reece James​
Wigan Athletic​
€1.40​
Danny Welbeck​
Arsenal FC​
€20.00​
Shinji Kagawa​
Borussia Dortmund​
€8.00​
Alexander Büttner​
Dinamo Moscow​
€5.50​
Wilfried Zaha​
Crystal Palace​
€3.80​
Chicharito​
Real Madrid​
€3.00​
Bebé​
SL Benfica​
€3.00​
Michael Keane​
Burnley FC​
€2.56​
Patrice Evra​
Juventus FC​
€1.90​
Ángelo Henríquez​
GNK Dinamo Zagreb​
€1.50​
 
That seems like a much too high figure for LvG - should be in the area of 130 million. Mind you, that's counting from the 14/15 season onwards. Maybe that's the discrepancy, on which manager you put the 13/14 transfers (Mata etc)? I can no longer remember exactly when LvG entered the picture there.

But if that's the reason, LvG would still have a much lower annual net spend.

LvGs spending was a lot higher than 130 million

Di Maria was £56 million, Martial £35 million, Rojo £16 million, Herrera £29 million, Shaw £27 million, Memphis £25 million, Schneiderlin £24 million - and Darmian, Schweinsteiger, the loan cost for Falcao etc

I would say he spent £250 million
 
Status
Not open for further replies.