zing
Zingle balls
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2005
- Messages
- 14,303
Apparently there is a photo of Salman Butt looking at the bowler when he's about to bowl(looking out for the no ball) instead of looking at the batsman.. can someone link to this please?
Found it. First video here.
Amir Salman Butt Asif NoBall Lords Test Fixing Controversy Pakistan | Cricket Video
Second video discredits that theory, though. He's clearly looking at Amir in some random delivery as Amir's about to deliver. It does explain why Pakistanis are so shit at catching, though.. they're looking at the wrong end.
Kid influenced by senior players my arse. Aamer deserves nothing less than a ban for life if guilty.
All three have asked to be dropped from the rest of the tour.
Just seen on SKY news I think it was the team manager saying that all three had been set up ????????
What bollocks the evidence is there for all to see in the match , thse noballs are not mistakes
I agree with Shane Warne ban them for life
EDIT It was the Pakistan High Commiseoner.
I love Warney, but he needs to shut up about this sort of stuff...He and Mark Waugh took money from a bookie in exchange for providing information, and was fined by Cricket Australia for it.
If the ICC feels they need to be banned for life, so be it, but Warney can't get on a high horse.
fair point , but what they did was nothing compared to what the Pakistan players are said to of done.
What the Pakistan players are said too of done is cheating plain and simple.
The Poilice are questioning all 3 tommorow ,maybe charges will be pressed , who knows.
If they are charged that thats the end of the cricket life,no team will touch them and rightly so.
I cant beleve that the Pakistan HC says that the 3 were set up , what is he on , has he not seen the match vid.
The Pakistan High Commissioner is simply taking the position of the Pakistani govt. It's like the Israeli ambassadors all around the world, who will go out and justify the killing of a toddler, it's their job. They have to take the company line.
I hardly believe they were set up...this is Pakistan, they are in the sh1tter, It's not like the gutter press were trying to setup the aussies, so England could win the Ashes for sure...Or out to ruin some saintly reputations..Pakistan as a nation and the cricket team as an extension are almost always the target of ridicule.
One thing that does need to be mentioned here is, Indian bookmakers...these nasty feckers are just as bad, but of course no one will mention them, just in case the BCCI gets offended.
Indian bookies went after the Aussies, South Africans, and even desperately poor Bangladeshi national team players.
So BCCI are to blame for Indian bookmakers...
Right.
The Pakistan High Commissioner is simply taking the position of the Pakistani govt. It's like the Israeli ambassadors all around the world, who will go out and justify the killing of a toddler, it's their job. They have to take the company line.
I hardly believe they were set up...this is Pakistan, they are in the sh1tter, It's not like the gutter press were trying to setup the aussies, so England could win the Ashes for sure...Or out to ruin some saintly reputations..Pakistan as a nation and the cricket team as an extension are almost always the target of ridicule.
One thing that does need to be mentioned here is, Indian bookmakers...these nasty feckers are just as bad, but of course no one will mention them, just in case the BCCI gets offended.
Indian bookies went after the Aussies, South Africans, and even desperately poor Bangladeshi national team players.
Blaming BCCI for pulling their weight around is stupid, in any sport in the world if one entity is producing 75% of the income, it will command more power than others.
Infact BCCI are still being restrained. If some proper ambitious business man was incharge there, they could easily breakaway from ICC and run a cricket league based on India only. Think IPL but a 9 months long league like football one with tests, ODIs etc. They could pull off what Packer tried back in 80s.
I was talking in general not just in this case. BCCI are a corrupt, power hungry body but now they are taking well care of cricket in India. Getting the best foreign talent to play in India will help young players here develop anyway.
Coming to the main point, I doubt there is any match fixing in Indian cricket anymore. Forget the marketing contracts, just playing a couple of series for India is enough to be set for life. Infact forget the IPL mega contracts, even Ranji players earn decent enough wages now days.
Then BCCI were one of the boards to actually take proper action against its players unlike say Australia who were the ones to let their players with a slap on the wrist. Let us not forget it was the Indian police who blew open the case back then anyway.
Even if Indian bookies are linked, BCCI would not be bothered unless any Indian cricketers are involved.
Indian public drives all the money for BCCI. And that would not stop unless any Indian cricketer is implicated. Even with Pak in this state, organise an Indo-Pak series tomorrow and millions will be poured in by sponsors with higher viewer ratings that Ashes.Why not? It harms the credibility of the game. Sponsors spend millions because they want to be associated with something positive, not scandal.
Have you seen how quickly Aamer lost his kit sponsor?
As you say, India are the driving force in cricket, and reap the most benefit from it, it is beyond irresponsible for them to say, well the Bookies aren't targeting Indian players, so who cares.
Like I said, the ultimate responsibility is with individual players and boards, but India can't ignore that a part of the equation is residing in their backyard.
BCCI has links with bookmakers? That is the first I am hearing of it. They are bathing in millions, if they want to earn a buck or two, there are much easier ways than getting involved in betting. Something like 100k is nothing for them. Infact most of the people involved at the board level are already rich anyway, via being a politician or having some kind of business empire.Nevermind, you are obviously not going to accept that the BCCI has links with the bookies, and in past investigations has been less than forthcoming, and instead hidden information so as to protect itself, and its head honchos.
The BCCI is not a law enforcement agency, but they exist to know the good and bad of the game, it is their responsibility to finger dodgy bookmakers, and potential trouble makers...I feel they are not doing this with as gusto as they could/should.
You patently feel differently, and feel if the Indian public get to watch cricket, and the stadiums are full, it's all that matters.
I love Warney, but he needs to shut up about this sort of stuff...He and Mark Waugh took money from a bookie in exchange for providing information, and was fined by Cricket Australia for it.
If the ICC feels they need to be banned for life, so be it, but Warney can't get on a high horse.
Coming to the main point, I doubt there is any match fixing in Indian cricket anymore. Forget the marketing contracts, just playing a couple of series for India is enough to be set for life. Infact forget the IPL mega contracts, even Ranji players earn decent enough wages now days.
He's confusing it with the CBI.
Same old cover-up feeling
ICC and Pak wait in replay of 1995
LOKENDRA PRATAP SAHI
Sept. 1: With the International Cricket Council (ICC) and the Pakistan establishment content with waiting for Scotland Yard to act, one gets the impression that both may not be outraged if a case can’t be made out against the players alleged to have ties with bookie Mazhar Majeed.
Headed by India’s Sharad Pawar, the ICC has only been stating the obvious, which effectively means nothing, without admitting that its Anti-Corruption and Security Unit has been a colossal failure. As also its move to “educate” players on the perils of match-fixing.
Numbed by yet another controversy, huge at that, the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) hasn’t gone into overdrive either. Incidentally, the country’s President, Asif Ali Zardari, is its patron.
Both the ICC and the PCB, it seems, are on the same page and perfectly happy to keep it blank. This, surely, is as scandalous as the expose itself in the UK.
“What better can you expect? The names of the current coach and his assistant (Waqar Younis and Ijaz Ahmed, respectively) had cropped up when allegations of match-fixing flew thick and fast a decade ago, yet the PCB got them on board. They shouldn’t have been part of the dressing room,” insisted a well-placed source.
Despite the burning of effigies and an emotional call for life bans, a cover-up is feared.
There is, after all, a history of brushing embarrassing happenings under the carpet. One example is how the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) reacted when this reporter wrote about two bookies being evicted from the players’ enclosure during the 1995 Asia Cup, in Sharjah.
The match? India versus Pakistan. The result? India, led by Mohammed Azharuddin, thrashed by 97 runs.
Shockingly, the bookies had gained access to that enclosure (arrangements used to be very different then) by claiming to be “close friends” of a senior India player.
Then, while being evicted, around half an hour after the start of the match, they spoke at some length to one of the India reserves for that day.
Their interaction was seen first-hand by this reporter and featured in the April 8, 1995, report in The Telegraph. Five years later, it made the Central Bureau of Investigation’s report, too.
As the 1996 World Cup, co-hosted by India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, was just 10 months away, a senior BCCI official rushed to Sharjah and requested that the issue be closed, otherwise the ICC would shift the showpiece tournament out of the subcontinent.
The request was made when this reporter suggested that the BCCI initiate a full-fledged probe and that the reserve player be called for a face-to-face meeting in the presence of whoever the senior official wished.
What happened? That suggestion wasn’t acted upon. Strangely (or, well, not so strangely), there was also no response from the ICC.
“Please understand that if you file any more reports on the incident, the World Cup won’t be with us.… We’ve fought hard to get it and now.… The manager (Arun Narain Singh) has told us that nothing was amiss.… So, let the issue rest,” the senior BCCI official pleaded.
Five summers on, a match-fixing scandal shook the BCCI to its core. Had it seen the bigger picture, back in 1995, it would’ve acted both against the senior player and the reserve.
Maybe, then, Cronjegate wouldn’t have happened.
With the 2011 World Cup five months away, some in the ICC can again actually use the tournament as a bogey to sit still and wait for public memory, which is usually short, to be overwhelmed by a non-cricket controversy.
One may add that Cricket Australia (then the Australian Cricket Board) had kept quiet on the telephone conversations between Shane Warne and Mark Waugh with an Indian bookie, in 1994.
The revelation came in 1998. Worse, Warne and Waugh had been let off with fines, even though they’d confessed to providing “information” to the bookie!
Warne and Waugh gave tips on the likely XIs, the pitch and the weather, too. The information must have helped the bookie fix odds.
Clearly, as cricket faces another credibility test, Australia and its players can’t take the high moral ground.
The Telegraph - Archives
Why not when he is right? He did something a bit dim (no surprise there with it being Warne) but there was no real problem with the information he gave (weather) and it was merely designed to get him in and no dount then try to influence matches later when he was in too deep.
So ICC have suspended these players. Isn't this a classic case of guilty before proven innocent? Ok practically it isn't possible to play but how can they be suspended if the ICC hasn't even heard a case or given these guys a chance to defend themselves
So ICC have suspended these players. Isn't this a classic case of guilty before proven innocent? Ok practically it isn't possible to play but how can they be suspended if the ICC hasn't even heard a case or given these guys a chance to defend themselves
ummm no, I'm not confusing it with the Central Bureau of Investigations. I am amazed at the blindness/defensiveness shown by the Indian fans on here,
BCCI can't investigate anything, India makes the most money, we don't need anyone.
BCCI is one of the most corrupt bodies and with Sharad Pawar at the helm of the ICC, I don't think we are going to see much progress. He is a politician (and it goes without saying, a corrupt one). So to assume that there isn't a problem in Indian cricket with regard to match-fixing, is naive.
However, we have a very powerful board, which has enough power to sway the media. You don't find much criticism of the board, other than from someone fiercely independent like Bishen Singh Bedi (and maybe he has his own agenda too)
You are talking about a time when situation was completely different.ummm no, I'm not confusing it with the Central Bureau of Investigations. I am amazed at the blindness/defensiveness shown by the Indian fans on here,
BCCI can't investigate anything, India makes the most money, we don't need anyone.
This is an example of what I mean...money over integrity. They can't prosecute, they can't gt arrest warrants, but they sure as hell can help provide information, instead of asking for the world to back off...
BCCI may as well be anti-christ, listing their current power does not equate to defending them. They can have 9 out of 12 months cricket here, why do you think we play OZ so frequently now. Even they as the best team out there know, best way to earn is by playing India.Exactly. I am not calling the BCCI the anti-christ, but on the one hand we have people saying, BCCI can do what it wants, have cricket in India 9 out of 12 months of the year, no need for anyone, but on the other hand, it supposedly is powerless against the vultures that sit by waiting to pick it apart.
Just read the according to the ICC rules, the case against the 3 pakistani players has to be brought up within 3 months, I certainly hope they don't take that long. The longer things take, the less people will care(of course things shouldn't be hurriedly in such a manner, that the investigation is compromised).