Feed Me
I'm hungry
The bookies just shouldn't take bets on things like no-balls... it's all to easy to fix things like that...
Banning Aamer for life would be exceptionally harsh on such a young kid, everyone makes mistakes... and I'd hate to see his career ruined and the sport of Cricket robbed of such an exceptional talent.
The rest of the participants need to be banned for life.. senior cricketers who won't change and will just fall back into the old ways if given lenient punishment. I also hope the ICC are in charge of this operation rather than the PCB wanting to stick their oar in.
YouTube - Randiv No-Ball Prevent Sehwag From Getting Century
Can this too be construed as spot fixing? Though the bowler will not have benefited financially...
Sad sad story and all to predictable. This is the reason why I stopped supporting Pakistan alongside England in cricket ever since 1999.. corrupt bunch of cnuts and all the pakistani's are stupid enough to fall for their shit on a repeated basis.
England all the way.
The problem is a lot wider than just Pakistani cricket or just one particular sport, and I particularly don't also agree the basis of corruption is just poverty. Performers from rich countries have also been majorly involved in betting scams. Italian football was exposed for serious corruption, a snooker player was arrested last year, and there were rumours of spot betting in the Premiership where players were paid for timing throw-ins.
I agree with you, my post was just about the Pakistani cricket team in general as its what the OP was about and why I pity those who still place their faith in them when the team is so engulfed by corruption.
Everyone knows it's been going on for years in cricket, especially - but not exclusively - with teams from the sub-continent. I hope they can prove it this time...
Matt Le Tissier admitted doing something similar in football - betting on the first throw in being awarded before a certain time, or something like that. Granted, he is now retired so he can't really be punished per se, but it's the same principle really. No one batted an eyelid when he made that admission. Interesting...
I don't really follow cricket that much, but by all accounts this Aamer lad is a proper talent. And in mitigation, he is an extremely young man who has likely been influenced by clever and manipulative middle men. It'd be a shame if a life ban ensued as a result.
As a slight aside, all the media are having to call it "alleged" spot fixing at the moment - for libel purposes and what not. Is there any chance that this whole thing could be coincidental? Salman Butt was quite vociferous in insisting his and his teammates' innocence.
India, SA and Pakistan were the only ones to hand out punishments to their players. The Indian bookie bank in 2000 implicated players from SA, Sri Lanka, England, WI, NZ and Australia. Everyone just covered for their players
Butt was seen in a photograph with Majeed, and a couple of players are seen accepting cash from Majeed in a video. How much more proof is needed?
Aamir (sp?) is such a good bowler player and he's still only 18. I do feel sorry for him that he's mixed up in all this, because 1. he has the potential to become a truly great player and 2. as an 18 year old, if you were being given orders by your captain to ball a no ball, would you have the guts to speak out? (Especially when you play for a country like Pakistan).
On one of the clips on the NOTW video, you can see the captain go up to Aamir to give him some "instructions" before he bowls the no ball. It might not be as black and white as people think.
I think the senior ones should be hung out to dry but I'd be far more careful about how they go about dealing with Aamir.
Butt was seen in a photograph with Majeed, and a couple of players are seen accepting cash from Majeed in a video. How much more proof is needed?
'Ban them for life': England captain Andrew Strauss calls for Pakistan players found guilty of match fixing to be kicked out of cricket
His announcement follows allegations that Pakistani bowlers Mohammad Aamer and Mohammad Asif deliberately bowled no balls during the final Test against England at Lord's as part of a betting scam.
Four players including the captain and vice-captain were questioned by Scotland Yard over claims that they took cash from an international betting racket.
‘If someone is proven to categorically be guilty then the only way forward is for them not to play international cricket again,’ said the England captain.
But Pakistan's most famous cricketer Imran Khan insisted his country should not be banned from competing if any of its players were found guilty of match-fixing allegations.
Retired captain Khan, whose skills as an all-rounder and eventual career as a politician catapulted him to stardom in Pakistan, said the country should not suffer for the alleged actions of a handful of people.
'Why should Pakistan cricket suffer if some players have indulged in a crime? Why should Pakistani supporters suffer because of that?' Khan said yesterday.
'The people who are found guilty should be removed from the team and replaced and should be punished as an example for future generations to realise that crime does not pay.'
He said he was 'shocked' at the allegations.
'It's a very depressing day for Pakistan cricket but I still want to wait until the whole story unfolds until we know whether the allegations are correct.'
The allegations could become the biggest setback for Pakistani cricket, he said.
'If they are proved, not just in terms of the best players in the team being implicated but from the public point of view, they would not understand the finer points of the game and each time they lose they will think it's a fixed match, so it has long-term repercussions for Pakistani cricket provided the allegations are true.'
Pakistan’s Sports Minister Ijaz Jakhrani said any players found guilty would be banned for life.
He said: ‘We will take strict action, but first we will have to look at the inquiry report (from the British police) and once it implicates someone then we will give exemplary punishment. All the players involved must forget to play for Pakistan in the future.’
Despite calls for the final Test at Lord’s between England and Pakistan to be abandoned, Day Four of play still went ahead yesterday, with Pakistan quickly losing and being booed off by their own supporters.
Meanwhile, officers raided the £1.8million Surrey mansion of property tycoon Mazhar Majeed, who is an agent to several of the Pakistan players and is accused of being the mastermind of the scam.
Majeed, 35, was arrested after the News of the World said its reporters had paid £150,000 to buy their way into a match-fixing ring.They met Majeed and the Pakistani players by posing as front men for a Far Eastern betting syndicate.
Footage filmed secretly by the newspaper appeared to show Majeed accepting a huge pile of banknotes and promising to reveal exact details of when Pakistani bowlers would deliberately deliver three ‘no balls’ – stepping over the line, supposedly accidentally. Majeed, who was born in Croydon, was photographed showing off the cash inside his jacket to the players outside a restaurant.
Then at Lord’s last Thursday and Friday, bowlers Mohammad Aamer and Mohammad Asif delivered the promised no-balls at the specified TV commentators Ian Botham and Mike Atherton could be heard expressing astonishment at how far the bowlers overstepped the mark.
Majeed allegedly boasted that he could do much more – including arranging the throwing of whole matches.
He claimed that the second Test in Sydney between Australia and Pakistan in January – when the visitors lost from what seemed an unbeatable position – was rigged, netting a betting syndicate more than £830,000.
And he said two one-day internationals against England next month were already earmarked to be deliberately lost.
Majeed claimed he had been dealing with the Pakistani team for two and a half years, and said: ‘We’ve made masses and masses of Excusing the behaviour alleged of the seven Pakistani stars he said were involved, he said: ‘These boys need to, they’re paid peanuts.’
Last night, team manager Yawar Saeed confirmed that the side’s young captain, Salman Butt, the vice-captain and wicket keeper Kamran Akmal, and the two bowlers Aamer and Asif had all been questioned by detectives.
Three players had their mobile phones taken away.
Pakistan’s prime minister Yousef Raza Gilani said the allegations made his country ‘bow its head in shame’, while sports minister Ijaz Jakhrani said any players found guilty could ‘forget playing for Pakistan in the future’.
BBC cricket correspondent Jonathan Agnew wrote on his Twitter page: ‘If these allegations are true – or even if they’re not, frankly – you do wonder what you are watching in front of you.’
The businessman owns Croydon Athletic Football Club, a minor club in the Ryman League. His brother Azhar has also apparently acted as an agent to the Pakistani cricket team.
Pakistan fans at Lord’s expressed disgust at their team. One, from Burnley, said: ‘This is the time of Ramadan for Muslims when you are meant to pray with a pure heart. They have a lot to be asking forgiveness for.’
Pakistan’s president, Asif Ali Zardari, spoke to members of the Pakistan Cricket Board in London yesterday to urge ‘thorough compliance’ with police inquiries, a team official said. In Pakistan the Federal Investigation Agency launched its own inquiry, arresting two people said to have links to bookmakers. The agency has the power to access the players’ bank accounts and crosscheck with their income tax certificates.
Michael Vaughan, former England cricket captain, wrote on social networking site Twitter: 'Anger is my thoughts at the moment. ... it's just a great shame why this has to happen. Very sad.'
Former England fast bowler Angus Fraser told Sky News: 'Everyone with a deep love or interest for the game will be absolutely appalled by these allegations.'
He added: 'Cricket has got to get a grip, a sport cannot afford to be surrounded by such a controversy.'
Last night, the manager of Pakistan's cricket team confirmed that British police were questioning players over the allegations. Yawar Saeed told The Associated Press: 'I can confirm that we are aware of the allegations and Scotland Yard police are with us now at the hotel and we are helping them with their inquiries.' A source close to the team management last night appeared confident that there was no substance in the claims.'I'm confident it is b*******t," the source said.
Scotland Yard said it arrested a man in relation to the newspaper's investigation. A force spokesman said: 'Following information received from the News of the World we have today (Saturday August 28) arrested a 35-year-old man on suspicion of conspiracy to defraud bookmakers.'
The brother and business partner of the man arrested said today that the allegations were 'just rubbish'.
Azhar Majeed confirmed to the Associated Press that his brother Mazhar Majeed was the man arrested by police in relation to the News of the World's sting.
He said the claims were 'laughable', adding: 'I thought it was just rubbish.'
In video footage released by the News of the World, Mazhar Majeed is apparently seen with a pile of money in front of him.
Speaking about his brother's arrest, Azhar Majeed told the Associated Press: "I'm extremely worried. Nothing like this has ever happened to us. Ever. 'I have no idea as to what happened and what's led to him counting out that money.'
The News of the World reporting team claims it was told exactly when three no balls would be bowled during the current Test.
The Pakistani side has been dogged by match fixing scandals and allegations of cheating since the 1990s.
Four years ago, the team were accused of ball tampering during a tour to England. Australian umpire Darrell Hair ruled that Pakistan had forfeited the Test at London's Oval by refusing to take the field in a protest over his ball-tampering ruling. In May this year the International Cricket Council's anti-corruption unit looked at the team's poor performance after being heavily beaten by Australia during a tour of the country. Following reports of infighting in the team, the Pakistani Cricket Board banned former captain Younus Khan and tour captain Mohammad Yousuf for an indefinite period.
Last year a committee of Pakistan's parliament summoned senior figures from the team to discuss allegations that they deliberately lost a Champions Trophy match to prevent India from reaching the semi-finals.
In addition, security fears in the sub-continent saw international teams refuse to play in Pakistan.
Repeated incidents of terrorism including an attack on the visiting Sri Lankan team resulted in the Pakistan team playing all their games overseas.
A vipers' nest of greed and corruption
'I don't believe in such rumours. It is total rubbish. I have faith in every player of the team,' said the Pakistan coach Intikhab Alam, responding to claims last year that his players were involved with illegal bookmakers.
How hollow that defiant rhetoric seems today.
The latest allegations against the Pakistan squad point to what seems to be a vipers' nest of corruption at the heart of a sport once renowned for its fair play.
Intikhab should have known not to be so forthright in his protestations about the spirit of honour in the heart of his team.
For too long, Pakistan's cricket has been enveloped by a culture of cash-grabbing dishonesty which has not only undermined the nation's sporting reputation but has tainted the integrity of international cricket. Now the stench of abuse has seeped beyond that troubled, divided nation.
India and Sri Lanka, the other two great cricketing nations of Asia, have also been hit by match-rigging scandals, as has cricket in South Africa.
The current row, which casts a dark shadow over England's series victory, is just the latest in a lengthening catalogue of financial sharp practice and match rigging in international cricket, most of it generated by the dodgy activities of illicit Asian-based bookmakers.
As far back as the winter of 1979-80, there were accusations that Pakistan had deliberately thrown matches during a tour of India, while during the 1987 World Cup it was claimed that the team wilfully contrived to lose the semi-final against Australia, though none of these charges was substantiated.
In the 1990s, the problem became more serious as betting on cricket in Asia grew in popularity. In 1994, several Australian cricketers, led by the spin legend Shane Warne, said that they were offered bribes worth around £35,000 by the Pakistan captain Salim Malik to underperform during a tour of the country.
An investigation into the affair by Pakistani high court judge Malik Mohammad Qayyum found many of the allegations proven. The country's captain, once the nation's hero, became a pariah and was banned for life, as was the fast bowler Ata-**-Rehman.
But other top Pakistani internationals embroiled in the scandal were treated with far greater leniency, receiving only minor fines.
The failure to take a tough approach saw the sport of cricket become more and more tainted.
The collapse in the game's moral authority was symbolised by the downfall of South African captain Hansie Cronje, who admitted he took money from Indian bookmakers to throw matches, including a Test against England in 2000.
As the depths of corruption were exposed, several top Indian players, including Mohammad Azharuddin, were banned for life.
But it was Pakistan that remained central to most allegations, never more feverishly than when the team's coach, former England cricketer Bob Woolmer, was founded dead in his hotel room during the 2003 World Cup.
So potent was the atmosphere of corruption that foul play was initially suspected in his death – perhaps by a player fearful of being exposed, though it later emerged that he had probably died of natural causes.
Over the last decade, cricket authorities around the world like to think they have rooted out most of the problems. The game's governing body, the ICC, has set up a powerful anti-corruption unit headed by Sir Paul Condon, former head of the Metropolitan Police.
But this new scandal has revealed such optimism to be wishful thinking. Abuse seems as prevalent as ever in Asia, thanks to a number of factors. One is the influence of a vast network of illegal bookmakers.
Gambling is illegal in most of Asia but it thrives underground through a vast army of dubious agents. The sums of money involved can be phenomenal, reflecting both the huge popularity of cricket and the growing affluence of booming economies.
In the Indian Premier League, the continent's leading domestic competition followed obsessively on television, 'official' bets using credit cards can be worth up £10million but the illicit takings are far greater, providing a massive incentive for rigging.
Sir Paul Condon estimated that up to £500million can be gambled in a single day on a World Cup game.
The sophisticated nature of the game of cricket lends itself to ever more complex bets on every possible permutation of players' actions.
Moreover, because cricket is essentially an individual contest – batsman versus bowler – within a team context, corruption is easier to orchestrate.
The innate problems in Pakistan's deeply unstable society, beset by Islamic terrorism and political venality, also help undermine the fight against match-rigging.
Cricket writer Osman Samiuddin put it this way: 'There is already a deep-seated distrust of public figures in the hearts of the vast majority of the population', thanks to 'megalomaniac leaders, corruption, cultish politics and extreme maladministration'.
Tragically, cricket has become sucked into this culture. The hierarchy of authority has lacked the mandate or the inclination to impose its will.
Even Judge Qayyum, who was meant to root out the abuses after the Salim Malik affair, admitted he was too lenient because he was 'a fan' of some of the players accused.
This mixture of complacency and softness has been a recipe for disaster. Instead, cricket' s authorities must get tough, and that means suspending Pakistan from the sport until its game is thoroughly cleaned up.
I'm afraid this has been going on in Pakistani cricket since Imran Khan's days. Wasim and Waqar were long time exponents, handing over the baton to Inzi and Mo Yo on their way out.
A lot of seriously good cricketers' careers have been murdered who didn't conform (Rashid Latif, Aaqib Javed, Ata ** Rehman and our very own Brian Lara - Basit Ali). India found their saviour just in time (sponsorship), Pakistan in the meantime got poorer and poorer.
Banning Aamer for life would be exceptionally harsh on such a young kid, everyone makes mistakes... and I'd hate to see his career ruined and the sport of Cricket robbed of such an exceptional talent.
Matt Le Tissier admitted doing something similar in football - betting on the first throw in being awarded before a certain time, or something like that. Granted, he is now retired so he can't really be punished per se, but it's the same principle really. No one batted an eyelid when he made that admission. Interesting...
I'd love to hear Zardari's take on this issue.
Would be comedy gold.
I'd love to hear Zardari's take on this issue.
Would be comedy gold.
No you wouldn't.
He basically said these players are a shame for pakistan....obviously he hasn't looked in the mirror
Those no balls are too blatant for anyone reasonable to be in denial.
Banning Aamer for life would be exceptionally harsh on such a young kid, everyone makes mistakes... and I'd hate to see his career ruined and the sport of Cricket robbed of such an exceptional talent.
The rest of the participants need to be banned for life.. senior cricketers who won't change and will just fall back into the old ways if given lenient punishment. I also hope the ICC are in charge of this operation rather than the PCB wanting to stick their oar in.
Have Pakistan's cricket team been caught out?Pakistan have played some of the most spellbinding cricket of recent decades. But they are also a team dogged by controversy and will struggle to recover from this latest match-fixing scandal, says one long-suffering admirer
(
Rob Smyth The Guardian, Tuesday 31 August 2010 Article history
I was 16 years old when a cricket ball first spoke to me. In the moist English summer of 1992, the Pakistan fast-bowling pair of Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis made the ball move so prodigiously in the air that even the oldest lags could not recall a relevant precedent. The stock eulogy was that they "made the ball talk". In my eyes it didn't just talk; it wouldn't shut up for three months.
And nor would we. This was like nothing anyone had ever seen. During the World Cup final in March that year, when Pakistan beat England, our English Lit teacher Mr Adams came in and announced that he had some bad news. While most assumed imminent detentions for an unspecified misdemeanour, he announced: "Wasim Akram has just bowled Allan Lamb and Chris Lewis with consecutive deliveries." The detail is almost offensively bald: they were among the most remarkable balls in cricket history, and effectively secured the World Cup for Pakistan for the first time.
Coincidentally, England were scheduled to host Pakistan that summer. As in the World Cup final, our batsmen had not a solitary clue how to cope with Pakistan's newfound ability to "reverse swing" the old ball at extreme pace, because they had never seen such skill before. (Please don't ask me to explain the technicalities – suffice to say the ball would move late in the air in a way that made it almost impossible to play.)
As a consequence, the summer of 1992 was pockmarked by spectacular collapses, almost all of them by England. Stumps flew, balls boomeranged; England lost nine wickets for 102 runs and eight for 67 at Lord's, eight for 28 at Headingley, and seven for 25 at the Oval. Time after time their batsmen would be bowled or trapped LBW by unplayable balls vrooming violently towards the stumps. There has been never been such a devastating and sustained display of fast bowling in this country – not even from the West Indies in their prime.
At the time, before its late 20th-century makeover, Test cricket was a sober, staid business, a rational experience rather than a primal one. Draws were the norm and runs and wickets came at a funereal rate. It's in that context that we must understand the 1992 Pakistan side, and particularly Wasim and Waqar: they played unimaginably sexy cricket. It widened the eyes and tantalised the senses like a teenager's first visit to a nightclub, or the first sip of a high-class scotch. So this is what life can be like.
It also began a torrid love affair with the Pakistan team that, in the case of this cricket obsessive, has endured to this day. It is hardly surprising: to fans of the English game, Pakistan are especially seductive because they are everything we are not: unfettered, emotional and exceptionally gifted. When they play England, it is naked talent versus honest endeavour. Vicarious bliss. They also invest thrillingly and unashamedly in youth. Pakistan are top of the list when it comes to Test runs and wickets scored and taken by teenagers, with 6,532 and 363 respectively. England are bottom of both lists, with 388 and 16.
There is no team in sport quite like Pakistan. With bat and especially ball, they prefer to leave the uncontrollable uncontrolled, to let the chips fall where they may. Watching their bowlers' effect a batting collapse, which they have done more than any other nation, is one of the great sensory overloads to be had in sport. There is a mood of gleeful anarchy and unstoppable mischief that cannot be replicated.
But, if sublime is one of their two default settings, the other is ridiculous. Out in the middle, there is no middle ground. This is a team steeped in tragifarce, who do not do orthodoxy or mediocrity. Pakistan make the little girl with the little curl seem like equilibrium incarnate. And their status as the mavericks' mavericks, a team who could not be boring if they tried, means the overwhelming emotion at the latest match-fixing scandal is, for me, one of sadness rather than anger. Certainly, it was not surprise, for Pakistan have been transfixed by misfortune and controversy for almost two decades now, ever since Mr Adams came in with his bad news.
Yet even allowing for the back story, how has it come to this? How is it that a Test series full of charm and hope has ended with such numbing emptiness? How is it that a nation clinging to cricket for solace at a time when floods are decimating the country are left to feel only shame? And how is it that Mohammad Amir, the most promising 18-year-old bowler most of us have ever seen, may never bowl another ball in international cricket?
The suspicion of Pakistan cricket goes back to 1992: it was their highest point, but also their tipping point. There had been contretemps before, of course – most notably with regard to the perceived bias of Pakistani umpires, which exploded when England captain Mike Gatting was involved in his notorious finger-wagging spat with Shakoor Rana in 1987 – but it was the series in England that made them outsiders.
Pakistani cricket had never been healthier than it was that summer. They had just won the World Cup for the first time, and had drawn their three previous series against the otherwise omnipotent West Indies – a staggering and monstrously underrated achievement against a side who routinely thrashed everyone else. Pakistan then won a thrilling Test series in this country 2-1 and England, tired of slipping on the banana swing of Wasim and Waqar, responded with sour grapes. The whispers that Pakistan had illegally tampered with the ball to make it move so dramatically in the air became increasingly voluble, particularly when the ball was changed, without official explanation, during the fourth one-day international at Lord's.
Finally, Allan Lamb, England's South African-born middle-order batsman, accused Pakistan of ball-tampering in the tabloids – and so began almost two decades of mistrust and controversy surrounding the team. Much of it has been merited; but equally much of it has been mired in casual, often unconscious racism.
Take, for example, the contrasting reactions to Pakistan's reverse-swing in 1992 (Wasim and Waqar must be cheating) and England's in the Ashes in 2005 (masterful craftsmanship by Andrew Flintoff and Simon Jones). Such skewed conclusions can only partly be absolved by myopia and ignorance. But then again, to suggest that Pakistan have been entirely put-upon in their constant courting of controversy would be faintly ludicrous. Their story is an overwhelming and distressing mix of misbehaviour and misperception. Whether Pakistan cricket is institutionally corrupt or simply unable to escape its ripped genes is debatable; that it is a sorry mess is not.
Match-fixing has been the biggest bane. In 2000, when the South African captain Hansie Cronje was exposed and banned for life, there was a sad inevitability to Pakistan being dragged into the mix. Their former captain, Salim Malik, and second-string bowler Ata-**-Rehman were banned for life, with a number of other players – including the great Wasim Akram himself – fined.
Pakistan's Mohammad Amir with umpire Billy Bowden after the last match at Lord's in 2010. Photograph: Andrew Couldridge/Action Images Hindsight suggests that this was Pakistan's great missed opportunity to clean up their game. Instead, there was little more than a cursory hoover. Judge Malik Qayyum, who presided over the investigation, even said in 2006 that he had been lenient with some players because he "had a soft spot for them" – a confession of staggering negligence. And so the suspicions and rumours were allowed to fester unchecked until, finally, they exploded, in quite shocking fashion, during the 2007 edition of cricket's one-day World Cup, which was held in the West Indies.
The sudden death of Bob Woolmer, the English coach of Pakistan, only a few hours after his team's shock elimination by lowly Ireland, prompted an extraordinary overreaction: first it was officially announced as murder, then internet forums bubbled with the suggestion that one of the players had killed Woolmer, a disgracefully ludicrous scenario. Eventually, inevitably, it was formally confirmed that Woolmer had died of natural causes, yet that was not good enough for some. Pakistan cricket is far from innocent, but nor is it as guilty as some might have liked to believe then, and are suggesting now. The danger is that this can, and has, become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
There have been so many other problems. Pakistan are the only team ever to forfeit a Test match (at the Oval in 2006) after their then captain, Inzamam-ul-Haq, refused to lead his side back on to the pitch following yet more allegations of ball tampering. They have even had a player suspended for tampering with the pitch. And last year, Pakistan were banned indefinitely from playing Test cricket at home after the visiting Sri Lankan team were fired upon by terrorists while travelling to a match in Lahore.
Yet none of the above were as sad as this latest crisis, and for one principal reason: the involvement of Mohammad Amir, a teenager of extraordinary ability. This corruption of innocence, of the youngest bowler ever to reach 50 Test wickets, feels something akin to seeing your first born being arrested. It's almost impossible to comprehend.
We do not yet categorically know whether Amir is guilty, or whether we will ever again have the abundant pleasure of watching him bowl at international level, but his involvement has altered our perspective of this case. The inclusion of one so young in such allegations of match rigging (no matter whether they did or didn't affect the ultimate outcome of the Test match) suggests this is infinitely more complex than a case of unforgivable deviancy; that instead, there is an insidious process whereby young cricketers are being snared, particularly when they are susceptible to financial inducements: a gift here, a platitude there, the net closing imperceptibly all the while.
Cricket has, across the globe, never been as affluent as it is now – but not in Pakistan. The players were not allowed to play in the Indian Premier League, where participants earn three figures for every breath, because of cross-border tensions, and they are paid painfully little for representing Pakistan. The £4,000 cheque that Amir received through gritted teeth from the chairman of the England and Wales Cricket Board, Giles Clarke, for being Pakistan's man of the series against England was around three times the monthly retainer he gets from the Pakistan Cricket Board.
The game of cricket needs a healthy Pakistan, as anyone who has seen their Test matches against Australia and England this summer will confirm. Their on-field work possesses an almost blinding colour, but there is an even more powerful darkness off the field and, if these allegations are proven, the team has lost whatever credibility remained after its litany of past controversies.
Thinking back to that glorious English summer of 1992, when I first recognised the true joys of Test cricket courtesy of two extraordinary bowlers from Pakistan, I can only hope that now, finally, the issues that have beset this great cricketing nation for too long, immersing it in accusations both true and false, will be tackled and eradicated. And, most of all, that a sublime talent like Mohammad Amir will not be tainted forever. The alternative is far too depressing to contemplate. Say it ain't so, Mo.