HTG
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2011
- Messages
- 7,385
- Supports
- Bayern
And while Kaepernick is still out of work, the Raiders habe signed Peterman. They are not even trying to hide it.
Hide what? That they've given Gruden free reign to tank prior to Vegas or that Kaep is blackballed...?And while Kaepernick is still out of work, the Raiders habe signed Peterman. They are not even trying to hide it.
The blackballing, obviously.Hide what? That they've given Gruden free reign to tank prior to Vegas or that Kaep is blackballed...?
Ffs Gordon.
Our offense is fecked... Dez to the rescue
Why is it predominantly talked about as a "mental health issue" rather than a drug addiction issue? Can be both obviously, but now it looks like it's his own choice but he might be doing it because of the imminent suspension. I feel for him, hopefully he gets better quickly but playing football shouldn't be a priority for him anymore.
Re: the Eric Reid thing - I saw an OBJ comment on Instagram saying he got tested more than 10 times in just as many games this season, so I don't think 7 times in 11 games is anything spectacular if it's the same with other players (without a drug history).
Possibly, he didn't mention a specific timeline.Was that after the OBJ cocaine video came out though?
Possibly, he didn't mention a specific timeline.
Either way, you're a professional athlete, you're gonna get tested. What's the problem if you got nothing to hide?
Better in news, tbh. Easier and more vague in context.Why is it predominantly talked about as a "mental health issue" rather than a drug addiction issue?
Better in news, tbh. Easier and more vague in context.
Possibly, he didn't mention a specific timeline.
Either way, you're a professional athlete, you're gonna get tested. What's the problem if you got nothing to hide?
Every NFL player is hiding something regarding drugs.
That's a pretty ridiculous blanket statement.
Why so?
Why so?
Because you have absolutely no basis to say every single NFL player is doping.
Before you switch to the obvious extreme strawman I'm by no means saying the league is clean, there's almost certainly plenty of players upto some shady stuff, but you can't possibly say it's absolutely all of them across the league.
Why would they take the chance when getting caught would ruin their already short careers ?
I mean... sure. But do you actually believe those players are getting as big as they are naturally? Do you think these players are such genetic outliers that they recover from horrible injuries without a little help from the good old HGH?
I don’t mind though, doping makes the sport better when done safely.
Why would it ruin their careers? Coaches don’t give a toss if players take steroids. They habitually tell players to gain 10-20lbs in an off-season, how else are they supposed to achieve that?
So the only way for players to bulk up is steroids?
Also I don't think injury recovery is particularly fast in the NFL, is it? There's loads of players done for the season with injury every year. It's not like they're all coming back way ahead of expectations like at City.
Well for one they would get suspended, fined, blackballed as cheats etc etc. NFL players already have a very short life (3.3 years to be precise) during which they earn most of their money. So why would anyone jeopardize any of that ?
I don’t think it’s as much of a risk as you say. For a couple reasons:
1. It’s actually really hard to get caught taking steroids. There are loads of masking agents you can use, compounds are more sophisticated and harder to catch, and it’s a trivial matter for someone dedicated enough to time their cycles appropriately.
2. I don’t think you get blackballed as a cheat at all. I’ve yet to see a coach or organisation come out and rail against a player that’s been suspended for doping - they aren’t that stupid.
Lastly, the fines are negligible relative to the performance gains you get, which means way more earning potential.
The masking agents you describe are well known to the professionals at the labs who do the testing and are not as easy to evade as they were in the past. The fines are also "not negligible" when you consider that testing hot in season results in a 6 game suspension, which is about 40% or so of one's entire annual salary (NFL salaries are notoriously low when compared with MLB and NBA ones), so there's little to no incentive for a player who is already in the league for a limited period of time to squander their very short high earning years to bench a bit more weight or recover half a day faster.
I don’t think they are well known to testers actually. Masking agents proliferate at a faster pace than testers can update their methods. Also, for legal reasons, testers have to inform the entire league the exact substances they are testing for, and there needs to be a consultation period whenever they want to add new substances to the methodology - I’m actually impressed how professional athletes get popped for doping.
Hence why I said it’s not a risk, the penalties are heavy but not really worth thinking about cos you have to do something majorly stupid to get caught.
The incentive is huge - if you’re a lineman and you manage to gain 10-20lbs of good, lean mass that’s going to have a pretty good effect on your on-field performance. If you’re a linebacker it means you can play more downs, add more value to the team and earn more money.
That may have randomly been the case in the past but the penalties and technology in the current system make it much less feasible because the cost / benefit is lopsidedly in favor of the cost. Losing 40-70% of your annual salary makes whatever negligible gain you think you're getting (which itself is questionable since PEDs don't do anything if you have a poor work ethic or football technique) far too perilous. That's not to say various players don't do it, but to generalize that the entire league is doing it is a bit of a stretch.
Man I love this Ravens team so much , need them to win the division