Organic Potatoes
Full Member
The sharps coming in on the Pats; the public on the Packers.
I like the Steelers at 8-1.
I like the Steelers at 8-1.
Which WR deserves to be in the conversation this year though? No player went over 1,500 yards and the top WRs (Jones, Beckham, Brown, AJ Green, ...) just didn't do enough to be considered.There really needs to be more recognition for offensive players other than the QBs.
Not taking anything away from the QBs themselves, but there should be more WRs and RBs in consideration.
Their defense has been good off late. Not so sure about their offense though.
Yeah but what does he have to show for it? His team went from arguably the favourite to win the NFC with a 13-3 record to a losing record of 7-8-1 in a division with two of the worst teams in the NFL. His stats did improve, which was to be expected after last season, but I wouldn't say he was particularly valuable for them. If anything, the Cards had a more balanced and spread out offense yesterday after he went down.I disagree on Johnson as well, had a huge season
Rushed for 1239 yards and 16 TDs
Received for 879 and 4
That's an impressive season right there
Ryan for me, agree with the 123 of Ryan, Brady, Rodgers
Play-Off Predictions??
Saturday
Oakland at Houston (9.35pm I think)
Detroit at Seattle (1.15am I think)
Sunday
Miami at Pittsburgh (6.05pm)
Giants at Packers (9.40pm)
Never stopped JJ Watt being in consideration, his Texans never really did a lot eitherYeah but what does he have to show for it? His team went from arguably the favourite to win the NFC with a 13-3 record to a losing record of 7-8-1 in a division with two of the worst teams in the NFL. His stats did improve, which was to be expected after last season, but I wouldn't say he was particularly valuable for them. If anything, the Cards had a more balanced and spread out offense yesterday after he went down.
He was one of the big reasons why we got into the playoffs, contrary to Johnson's Cardinals, but I agree that JJ shouldn't have been in the MVP conversation either, yeah.Never stopped JJ Watt being in consideration, his Texans never really did a lot either
Yeah but what does he have to show for it? His team went from arguably the favourite to win the NFC with a 13-3 record to a losing record of 7-8-1 in a division with two of the worst teams in the NFL. His stats did improve, which was to be expected after last season, but I wouldn't say he was particularly valuable for them. If anything, the Cards had a more balanced and spread out offense yesterday after he went down.
Playoff prediction:
WILDCARD ROUND
Oakland @ Houston
Detroit @ Seattle
Miami @ Pittsburgh
Giants @ Green Bay
DIVISIONAL ROUND
Houston @ New England
Pittsburgh @ Kansas City
Giants @ Cowboys
Seattle @ Atlanta
CHAMPIONSHIP ROUND
Kansas City @ New England
Giants @ Atlanta
SUPER BOWL LI
Giants vs New England
It'll be Pittsburgh, Oakland, Green Bay and Seattle for me this weekend
Here's my question, why Brady?
I'll get lynched on here by some for daring to say it. I'd love to hear the arguments why Brady deserves it. He hasn't even been the best QB this season IMO.
Perfect away record, 28-2 TD-int ratio. Commanded the team with an inexperienced O line. Lost Gronk and Dola and didn't break stride.
Not going to lynch you, I'm biased for him of course, and he's having an incredible year.
Wouldn't deny he's had a great year but for me none of that puts him ahead of the likes of Ryan, who isn't playing under a coach that's debated as the greatest in the history of the game like Brady with as good of a system. I'd get it if Brady was number one in every stat and had blitzed his competition but he hasn't. He's missed 4 games (in which the Pats actually went 3-1 and looked good) and doesn't top any of the numbers bar the interception stat you mentioned. I can't see how you can have him ahead of a Matt Ryan just as an example based on this season (and I think there's others ahead of Brady too, I've already mentioned Bell who missed a similar amount of games as Brady and returned to be arguably as important to his team while putting up great numbers).
Hes doing it with no running game. Took him a game or two to find his stride, but then he's the best QB out there now. He should be rated above Brady and Ryan. Nearly a one man team dragging GB to playoffs.Common excuse is they had a bad defence. Fair enough, but then that actually counts against him. Ryan has had a worse defence for the entire year.
Brady's absolutely been the best QB this year, comfortably. The only thing going against him is that he missed four games.Here's my question, why Brady?
I'll get lynched on here by some for daring to say it. I'd love to hear the arguments why Brady deserves it. He hasn't even been the best QB this season IMO.
Brady's absolutely been the best QB this year, comfortably. The only thing going against him is that he missed four games.
True enough, but I think they're a better side than the TexansI'm unsure about Oakland. They looked really demoralised at the weekend.
True enough, but I think they're a better side than the Texans
Oakland has a quality Oline but our pass rush has been outstanding this season, so a lot will depend on who comes out on top of that battle. If we can consequently harass their third string QB (or will McGloin be fit?), we should be able to pressure him into mistakes and our secondary has been very good as well.It's a hard one, Texans are a bit of a train wreck at times, but it all depends if their D turn up. To me, I just watch the end of the Oakland game and felt sad for them - depends how much they can muster up in the coming week in terms of enthusiasm and self confidence.
Oakland has a quality Oline but our pass rush has been outstanding this season, so a lot will depend on who comes out on top of that battle. If we can consequently harass their third string QB (or will McGloin be fit?), we should be able to pressure him into mistakes and our secondary has been very good as well.
Will be an interesting game but we couldn't have asked for a better chance to proceed to the next round tbh, so no excuses.