Next permanent manager | Poll updated

Who should be the next permanent manager?

  • Luis Enrique

    Votes: 113 7.4%
  • Erik ten Hag

    Votes: 1,300 84.7%
  • Julen Lopetegui

    Votes: 10 0.7%
  • Mauricio Pochettino

    Votes: 79 5.1%
  • None of the above

    Votes: 32 2.1%

  • Total voters
    1,534
Status
Not open for further replies.
So..if tuchel becomes available..does he still become the number 1? He is underperforming in the league(after spending so much and wasted 90 on lukaku) and now real Madrid is having them for breakfast. A team that psg made look average last round.
no because of the situation at the club at the moment, he likely has a pass even if he capitulates and finishes 6th
 
I’m hoping this works out. I think there’s risks because so many great looking Dutch managers have failed miserably in the league but I do believe he’s worth the risk and deserves a shot more than Poch.

However I think the club have a big part to play in this also. If he establishes a style of play which is entertaining and we show we are moving in the right direction we need to allow that to develop. None of this top 4 or nothing balls. Even if we fail to get top 4 but have a more combative squad and style of play then we should consider that progress.

Get the playing style in order and we’ll establish ourselves as a too 4 team. None of this bouncing in and out of top 4 season to season is only leading to our short term outlook on how we move forward
 
Nonsense. You can't go from 9 years of rubbish to beating unstoppable teams like City and Liverpool to the title within 2 years. 5 years would be a sensible estimate
Agreed 100%. Expecting a shambles like Man Utd to reinvent itself in 2 years is la la land. Long term project is the only way.
 
Read some reports of him saying it will take five years to get us challenging again and quite a few people saying five years in this thread too....five years?

I know challenging next season is unlikely even signing all the right players and moving the right ones on, which wont happen, but five years?

If we made two good signings each season if not including the DeGea just outfield players, we would have a band new eleven in five years. Xavi with little management experience has come into a struggling Barca side that is virtually bankrupt and transformed them in months. Klopp came into a Liverpool side who were doing no better than us where the star players were ageing or wanting to move on and took less than three seasons.

This isnt the mid 80s where Ferguson took over United and took a good five years to get us challenging, no manager in the modern game gets that long at a top club to get them "challenging".

I dont know much about Ten Hag in all honesty, I dont think the right manager is out there at the moment. Hopefully he does really well here but just a gut feeling from all the comments I am reading on him. My initial thought is people seem obsessed with his playing style and coaching and brand of football or "a project" as seems to be the modern phrase, when that doesnt solve our problems, we need a real man manager who is ruthless as well, not sure I sense that from Ten Hag though dont know much about him
If the reports are true that he said it will take 5 years for him to make us "challenging" for a title, then how did he ace his managerial interview? Most top manager will take 2-3 season and if they had the same resource as our last manager, it will take 2 season. Unless they said that they will not back ETH and he will have the same budget as spurs, even then 5 years is a bad estimation. We already have a good foundation and it shouldn't take to long for him to have us challenging.
Stop making stuff up there are no reports just an article by Delaney who is hardly credible and have habit making stuff up and more often than not end up with egg on his face . With United's resources if manager can't put up credible challenge by third year in the league then he isn't upto to the job .
 
I just hope that on his arrival, ETH gets to the task of removing some of the first team squad and the toxicity which has caused the alarming drop in standards. Left at the club they'll only serve to thrown him under the bus.

Isn't part of the reason the club want him supposed to be that he is open to letting Murtough (who appears supremely unqualified) continue to make those decisions while he focuses on coaching.
 
Nonsense. You can't go from 9 years of rubbish to beating unstoppable teams like City and Liverpool to the title within 2 years. 5 years would be a sensible estimate
Yea it took Pep a full year and a half along with massive amounts of money to get Citeh playing his way consistently and that was already with a squad who had won a title not long before he got there.

It took Klopp 2 years before getting Liverpool to be a genuine trophy threat.

These things don't happen overnight, takes time to build greatness but I'll be feeling better than I have about the clubs long term future than I have at any point post-Fergie if it's ETH.
 
5 years:

year one, improved playing style, cut the deadwood, young hungry players that can be coached to greatness. OK if we miss out on Europe altogether as long as a clear path can be seen.

year two: progress. Perhaps Europa League qualification, good domestic cup runs, continue to recruit the right players.

Year three: deep cup run, top 4, maybe get a talented veteran player to supplement the squad, integrating young talent from the reserves/Academy.

year four top 3, domestic cup win, deep CL run.

year 5, title challenge CL final, domestic cup wins.
I could live with this if you told me this would happen under ETH.
 
Could say that about most managers post Sir Alex. 5-10 too late.
Feel better about this though. Get in!
He's still very young in managerial years so hopefully not too late.
That would have been a truly mental appointment back then. Much rather be hiring him now than then.
He had just made it to an ucl semi final barely losing in an upset so not that unlikely, also I remember there were talks of him replacing Valverde at Barcelona so he already was noted by the big names back then.
 
Nonsense. You can't go from 9 years of rubbish to beating unstoppable teams like City and Liverpool to the title within 2 years. 5 years would be a sensible estimate
In those 9 years, we have finished 2nd twice, won the europa league, and numerous domestic cup. We are not far from the top and if we achieved those with the managerial candidate we had, then a top manager should have us competing at a higher level and winning title faster.

Stop making stuff up there are no reports just an article by Delaney who is hardly credible and have habit making stuff up and more often than not end up with egg on his face . With United's resources if manager can't put up credible challenge by third year in the league then he isn't upto to the job .

That makes more sense. No manager worth his salt, would say that.
 
Nah that is some revisionist history you are going on about. I was the one taking most of the abuse because I remember how many supported him before he was appointed. People was drooling over the night in Paris moment and I knew then that, it was a false flag because we didn't deserve that win. I got critized a lot for my opinion then the same way I am now. That moment and the new manager bounce where pogba was exceptionally during that period made many people want Ole appointed. When we was appointed, his support grew even more. I know many people want to revise history in their favor, but the one who was critique for being wrong then, knew what exactly happened.

I just want to make it more clear now that the hype for ETH is phenomenal and there is an expectation that we are signing a Pep or klopp with the way people talk of him. Yet, I see similiarties with ralf who knows how to talk the talk and has the philosophy to back it, but not the experience at a top club to make the players respect him enough
There is confusion. I am talking about before his interim appointment, and you are talking about his official appointment. The reason why I don't use the latter is because there is no similarity between ETH and Ole. ETH isn't going to be given an interim job before deciding on his appointment. Ole had a couple of months to get fans on his side.

ETH is not in that situation so I don't know why you're comparing the two situations as if fan favor of appointment is a similar situation between the two.
 
Nonsense. You can't go from 9 years of rubbish to beating unstoppable teams like City and Liverpool to the title within 2 years. 5 years would be a sensible estimate

Sounds reasonable to me. Ajax has always been a well-run club with a philosophy ingrained since the days of Rinus Michels. We are a far bigger club, also with a philosophy that goes back to the days of Matt Busby and Jimmy Murphy. Trouble is, United have evolved into two separate entities with commercial success driving the club. How will ETH cope with those demands? He should have a chinwag with LVG before he puts pen to paper.
 
He's still very young in managerial years so hopefully not too late.

He had just made it to an ucl semi final barely losing in an upset so not that unlikely, also I remember there were talks of him replacing Valverde at Barcelona so he already was noted by the big names back then.

Not in 2018 he hadn't? The CL semi was in 2019 wasn't it?
 
Your ignorance is on show. McClaren and Ten Hag worked together at FC Twente and even won the Eredivisie. McClaren was also arguably the best no.2 Fergie ever had.
No it’s not ….Name something he’s done in the last 5 years …. The best number 2 20 years ago :lol: This place
 
Sadly not a problem I’ll ever experience!

I'm in the same boat. I just totally randomly stumbled on a video where Jay Leno explained why he refuses to buy a Ferrari.
 
Not in 2018 he hadn't? The CL semi was in 2019 wasn't it?
It was in 2018/19 basically the same season we made it permanent with ole.
We could have waited till the end of the season and then had gotten ten hag
 
He was right in that regard. He still played him a lot though. Where he was most certainly not right was deciding that the ideal "main centre forward" would be Lukaku :eek:

His rotation of Rashford and Martial on the left was obviously not ideal, but it worked reasonably well in his second season. What really buggered it up was signing Sanchez and playing him on the left as well.

Perisic did do well after United vetoed him, so I'm happy to concede that maybe Jose was right in that instance. What the latter's fanboys are less keen to shout about is all the expensive duds he landed us with. It's hardly surprising the board, in an extraordinary moment of lucidity, began to question his judgement.

Jose kept on about knowing how to win, yet brought in quite non Jose players.

He's big on dominant centre backs, yet in Bailly and Lindelof brought in 2 with very little aerial dominance.
And Lukaku who is the size of a target man, but nothing like one.

The whole thing was like an exercise in we need to employ Jose just to scratch that itch finally.

I feared we'd do the same with Poch, but the early noises sound positive on the high ceiling Ten Hag.

Obviously it can still very much not work, but it feels like the first time we've looked at a guy doing well at a strong European history club, yet to come to his peak.
 
5 years:

year one, improved playing style, cut the deadwood, young hungry players that can be coached to greatness. OK if we miss out on Europe altogether as long as a clear path can be seen.

year two: progress. Perhaps Europa League qualification, good domestic cup runs, continue to recruit the right players.

Year three: deep cup run, top 4, maybe get a talented veteran player to supplement the squad, integrating young talent from the reserves/Academy.

year four top 3, domestic cup win, deep CL run.

year 5, title challenge CL final, domestic cup wins.
I could live with this if you told me this would happen under ETH.

The fans would be out with #ETHout tweets by March of year one....
 
5 years:

year one, improved playing style, cut the deadwood, young hungry players that can be coached to greatness. OK if we miss out on Europe altogether as long as a clear path can be seen.

year two: progress. Perhaps Europa League qualification, good domestic cup runs, continue to recruit the right players.

Year three: deep cup run, top 4, maybe get a talented veteran player to supplement the squad, integrating young talent from the reserves/Academy.

year four top 3, domestic cup win, deep CL run.

year 5, title challenge CL final, domestic cup wins.
I could live with this if you told me this would happen under ETH.
You would think we are fecking Burnley with those goals :lol: Year three should be year one.
 
5 years is bollox talk as always.

Year one, big improvements in play style.
Year two, continuous improvements and obvious playing style, big improvements in points per game.
Year three, start challenging for stuff.
 
I hope he doesn't bring in a load of the Ajax players, they're not good enough
 
5 years:

year one, improved playing style, cut the deadwood, young hungry players that can be coached to greatness. OK if we miss out on Europe altogether as long as a clear path can be seen.

year two: progress. Perhaps Europa League qualification, good domestic cup runs, continue to recruit the right players.

Year three: deep cup run, top 4, maybe get a talented veteran player to supplement the squad, integrating young talent from the reserves/Academy.

year four top 3, domestic cup win, deep CL run.

year 5, title challenge CL final, domestic cup wins.
I could live with this if you told me this would happen under ETH.

:lol:

First 3 years belong to West Ham.
 
In those 9 years, we have finished 2nd twice, won the europa league, and numerous domestic cup. We are not far from the top and if we achieved those with the managerial candidate we had, then a top manager should have us competing at a higher level and winning title faster.
We've never come anywhere close to 1st place in any of that time. City, and now Liverpool. are so far ahead of us. Our squad will see wholesale changes in the next couple years. We'll likely miss out on CL football and therefore our budget will be smaller. To suggest that we could rebuild the squad to a point where it's capable of achieving 95-100 points in merely two seasons, given the current state of the squad, is ridiculous in my opinion, and all it does is set unreasonable expectations that can then be used to cause unrest further down the line.

As far as I'm concerned all we should be expecting in the next couple seasons is clear progress. The same way we seen clear progress when Klopp took over Liverpool and finished 7th, but they were playing some fantastic football regardless. If fans on the whole aren't prepared to get behind the plan long-term, then we may as well not bother at all quite frankly. There are NO quick fixes for this club, too much damage has been done for that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.