We should base our decision on not if it's an interim or not but on the fact is he doing a good job or not.We wasted 3 years on an interim, who should never have been given the permanent job, so we should do exactly the same thing again?
We should base our decision on not if it's an interim or not but on the fact is he doing a good job or not.We wasted 3 years on an interim, who should never have been given the permanent job, so we should do exactly the same thing again?
My biggest worry with ETH would be that the football he prefer is very circumstantial and not suited to any of the players in our squad. A bit like van Gaal. I'm also vary the difference between Ajax and Man Utd, and Eredivise and Premier League.
I'm really, really impressed by Graham Potter, and he would probably be my first choice. Their style is not that different, but Potters approach can be pragmatic and he knows the PL very well. Young too.
"Doesn't suit the players we have" cannot be an argument. Most of this squad will be replaced, or should be replaced, by the start of season 2023/2024 with players that fit the manager's vision and have what it takes to rise to the top. That is 2 summer and 1 winter transfers seasons. More than enough. Which is how a proper football club would go about it.
"Doesn't suit the players we have" cannot be an argument. Most of this squad will be replaced, or should be replaced, by the start of season 2023/2024 with players that fit the manager's vision and have what it takes to rise to the top. That is 2 summer and 1 winter transfers seasons. More than enough. Which is how a proper football club would go about it.
Yup my thoughts as well, i'd also rather take a punt on Gallardo than Poch.Ten Hag or bust.
Enrique won't leave Spain, but he'd be a fine choice as well.
I'd rather take the risk on Potter than employ Poch. His time at PSG has been heavily uninspiring.
ETH may or may not succeed at United but if you do bit of research on him it would make it clear he isn't somebody who need everything to be perfectly in order to make it work , if you have some spare time just go through this reddit post it might address some of your concern about him.I think that is a very optimistic view. We will not buy more than ten players within the start of 23/24. My guess is that we will buy eight. Maybe.
That is what I think makes Klopp time at Liverpool so great and made him able to succeed. He was able to work with a group of players that is quite different from the one he has today (and is probably more aligned with how he prefer to play). We need someone who can make it work with this squad, and then gradually change/upgrade it.
If ETH came in and tried to play "Ajax-football" at Man Utd, with our squad, in the PL it would not look good. Even if we buy three-four new players this summer.
ETH may or may not succeed at United but if you do bit of research on him it would make it clear he isn't somebody who need everything to be perfectly in order to make it work , if you have some spare time just go through this reddit post it might address some of your concern about him.
I think that is a very optimistic view. We will not buy more than ten players within the start of 23/24. My guess is that we will buy eight. Maybe.
That is what I think makes Klopp time at Liverpool so great and made him able to succeed. He was able to work with a group of players that is quite different from the one he has today (and is probably more aligned with how he prefer to play). We need someone who can make it work with this squad, and then gradually change/upgrade it.
If ETH came in and tried to play "Ajax-football" at Man Utd, with our squad, in the PL it would not look good. Even if we buy three-four new players this summer.
Ten Hag or bust.
Enrique won't leave Spain, but he'd be a fine choice as well.
I'd rather take the risk on Potter than employ Poch. His time at PSG has been heavily uninspiring.
Enrique and it's not even close. Also Enrique is a bit of a prick and would get rid of the drama whores currently playing for us.So who do you guys prefer ETH or Enrique
The more I think about it, the more i think Poch would be another one on his way out of OT in 2-3 years. No pedigree at all and his "fame" seems to be based on Spurs playing nice attacking football in a handful of games.
At the moment, for me, it's Ten Hag or Enrique unless the club is clever enough to interview 4-5 and they find someone better who we haven't thought about. I wouldn't be overly upset if it was Marco Rose. I don't understand the people here saying someone in their fifties is too old for the job. SF was in his early fifties when he won his first PL.
I can't make my mind up about Potter, other than he too hasn't won anything and his time could still come at a later date...
Pep, Jose and Zidane have skewed people’s opinions on manager age and what they should have achieved by a certain age I think. Good point that SAF was in his early 50s when he won his first PL. I didn’t know that.
ETH may or may not succeed at United but if you do bit of research on him it would make it clear he isn't somebody who need everything to be perfectly in order to make it work , if you have some spare time just go through this reddit post it might address some of your concern about him.
I think we ought to seriously look at tempting Diego Simeone away from Atletico Madrid if we can.
He's proved his ability to build teams, and maintain a high level of performance over a long period of time. And lord knows a bunch of our players need kicks up their backsides - which he is not afraid to provide.
Sir Alex won the Cup Winners Cup for Aberdeen and was the last manager to break the old firm axis in Scotland. Ferguson done a lot before United
His style of play is horrendous though and will not fly here
Is it really horrendous, though?
Defending deep and compact is not a bad thing, and quick counter-attacks was a huge part of SAF's teams. His teams also counter-press high up the pitch usually.
More importantly, he will instill a team-spirit in our team, and a cohesiveness in our play - which I believe is the need of the hour.
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...0/diego-simeone-italy-catania-atletico-madrid has some interesting quotes from Simeone about formations and tactics. He seems to be a pretty adaptable manager, making the best of what he has at his disposal...
But maybe others can chime in.
I think we ought to seriously look at tempting Diego Simeone away from Atletico Madrid if we can.
He's proved his ability to build teams, and maintain a high level of performance over a long period of time. And lord knows a bunch of our players need kicks up their backsides - which he is not afraid to provide.
Is it really horrendous, though?
Defending deep and compact is not a bad thing, and quick counter-attacks was a huge part of SAF's teams. His teams also counter-press high up the pitch usually.
More importantly, he will instill a team-spirit in our team, and a cohesiveness in our play - which I believe is the need of the hour.
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...0/diego-simeone-italy-catania-atletico-madrid has some interesting quotes from Simeone about formations and tactics. He seems to be a pretty adaptable manager, making the best of what he has at his disposal...
But maybe others can chime in.
That's almost Kelllyanne Conway levels of brazenness in this line of argument, I give you that muchPoch is a serial Bottler - Finished 3rd in a 2 horse race with Spurs and with that squad should of won the league the season Leicester did
- Finished 2nd in a 1 horse race last year with PSG bottled a cup final and his only trophy is the French Community shield - yes he is gonna win the league but so did Unai Emery shall we appoint him
I forgot, against whom did he lose that semi final, can you remind me?ETH - Has won the league at Ajax every season bar the Covid cancelled season
- Took them to the champions league semi final while dismantling Juventus & Real Madrid along the way and was a couple of minutes away from a champions league final
That's almost Kelllyanne Conway levels of brazenness in this line of argument, I give you that much
I forgot, against whom did he lose that semi final, can you remind me?
I forgot, against whom did he lose that semi final, can you remind me?
Klopp is 54 and Pep is 51. SAF was around 45 when he joined us so your comment makes no sense.ten Hag is already 52, he's too old.
Poch but who won the Champions league that year?That's almost Kelllyanne Conway levels of brazenness in this line of argument, I give you that much
I forgot, against whom did he lose that semi final, can you remind me?
Going by your logic, you can find problems with every manager's resume. "Guardiola? Nah, not fit for United. He hasn't done anything outside of the best club in the league. Klopp? Nah, not good enough for United. He's only been at small or struggling clubs. Can he withstand United's pressure? Probably not". It's insane. There's no guarantee that Ten Hag will succeed here, nor that any manager would. We can only judge by what he's showcased so far as a manager and that has been very, very impressive. The way his mind works, the way he sets up his teams to play, his philosophy, etc are all what we need to go back to the top.I've read that article before. And it sounds good! But it still is Eredivise and FC Utrecht. Louis van Gaal won the Eredivise with AZ. Dick Advocaat and John van den Brom have a higher points per match with FC Utrecht than ETH. Maybe they owe that to the job ETH did. Or maybe the management at FC Utrecht is a lot better these days and all three of them got to work in a good "environment".
Dont get me wrong, I would be very excited about ETH too. I just dont think we should get too carried away and pretend that there will not be any risk with him. There is no way to be sure that his approach will work in the PL or at a higher level.
That's almost Kelllyanne Conway levels of brazenness in this line of argument, I give you that much
I forgot, against whom did he lose that semi final, can you remind me?
Hansi Flick was 54 when he was appointed Bayern's head coach. And if I'm nor mistaken, it was his first big job as a head coach.Klopp is 54 and Pep is 51. SAF was around 45 when he joined us so your comment makes no sense.
But he was just an interim solution at first. He wouldn’t have gotten the job if he hadn't already been at the club. So while I agree that age in itself is not a blocker, Flick isn't a great example to prove rhis due to the special circumstances around his appointment.Hansi Flick was 54 when he was appointed Bayern's head coach. And if I'm nor mistaken, it was his first big job as a head coach.
Flick is a good example because he was 54 years old and was part of Kovac's backroom staff and hadn't been a head coach at a big club before. So Flick from assistant to interim to head coach, without having much experience as a head coach, is a very good example imo. And proves that coaching talent is there even at the age of 54, it just needs to be given a chance.But he was just an interim solution at first. He wouldn’t have gotten the job if he hadn't already been at the club. So while I agree that age in itself is not a blocker, Flick isn't a great example to prove rhis due to the special circumstances around his appointment.
Flick is not a good example, generally speaking, because he's an exception, his complete lack of previous team management jobs is somewhat misleading when you realize that he's worked closely with most of Bayern's spine during the NT's most successful years.Flick is a good example because he was 54 years old and was part of Kovac's backroom staff and hadn't been a head coach at a big club before. So Flick from assistant to interim to head coach, without having much experience as a head coach, is a very good example imo. And proves that coaching talent is there even at the age of 54, it just needs to be given a chance.
Ten Hag on the other hand has been showing his worth at the highest level for several years now and is far more proven than when Flick got the gig at Bayern at 54 years old.