BlackShark_80
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2016
- Messages
- 1,169
Main culprit for the situation we're in now?
You're some kind of comedian?Oh my life you’re deadly serious. I can’t cope!
You must of been up all night. Let’s hope your real name isn’t Ed Woodward
I think from 2013 till now there was more than enough time to restructure the club.Yes. The lack of direction today comes from the fact that we started from scratch in 2013. Before that the structure was SAF, he built a small team that fitted him and only him, in Summer 2013 we lost our CEO and our football structure, all the people left were inexperienced and had nothing to lean on, they also ultimately showed that they weren't competent but it doesn't change the fact that they were left with nothing from a structural standpoint.
I think from 2013 till now there was more than enough time to restructure the club.
This is depressing. We literally had one of top 10 managers in the world willing to accept an 18-month contract mere three weeks ago.
Whilst I think we can't blame it all on SAF he has indeed played a part, we know that he had a hand in bringing in Moyes and I'd suspect he played a part in getting Ole through the door and the subsequent overdue stay due to board inaction in the face of terrible results.It's for an other thread but SAF responsibility is a bit larger than that, if you consider the fact that he was in charge of the Football side organization, he knew that by leaving he would totally gut the team, yet he never altered the way he worked and introduced outsiders to the organization. As much as I have a lot of fondness and respect for SAF, he is one of the main culprit. With power comes responsibilities.
The stories were that SAF was against giving Ole the permanent job and wanted Poch instead.Whilst I think we can't blame it all on SAF he has indeed played a part, we know that he had a hand in bringing in Moyes and I'd suspect he played a part in getting Ole through the door and the subsequent overdue stay due to board inaction in the face of terrible results.
Seems there was an argument for and against Ole and if SAF put in a word in support of giving Ole more time when immediate action was required. As a result we lost out on a very good manager who could have stabilized us this season. Admittedly all of this is based on conjecture and we can't condemn the man on speculation.
Another thing is that Woodward has a fudiciary responsibility to take care of the club and he shouldn't allow 'outside' influence to alter his decision making processes. If he allowed SAF, Co92 or anyone to influence his decisions on the club then its on him. In nearly ten years in charge Woodward doesn't have the feel for the game, that intuition to know when and how to act in any situation is alien to him so we are always going to be playing catch up and in constant damage control if remains as influential as he is.
Who is Scuttlebutt? If it’s Rodgers then agreed, we are done as a serious football club for the next 3/5 years.Alright, scuttlebutt says Brendan Rodgers is all but confirmed at this point. And I'm inclined to believe that, as he is the most Woodward appointment ever.
sigh
We are finished. With Brendan Rodgers at the helm this club will at long last cement it's position firmly out of Top 4. On the bright side, at least will have a go at Carabao and FA I guess, haha.
Whilst I think we can't blame it all on SAF he has indeed played a part, we know that he had a hand in bringing in Moyes and I'd suspect he played a part in getting Ole through the door and the subsequent overdue stay due to board inaction in the face of terrible results.
Seems there was an argument for and against Ole and if SAF put in a word in support of giving Ole more time when immediate action was required. As a result we lost out on a very good manager who could have stabilized us this season. Admittedly all of this is based on conjecture and we can't condemn the man on speculation.
Another thing is that Woodward has a fudiciary responsibility to take care of the club and he shouldn't allow 'outside' influence to alter his decision making processes. If he allowed SAF, Co92 or anyone to influence his decisions on the club then its on him. In nearly ten years in charge Woodward doesn't have the feel for the game, that intuition to know when and how to act in any situation is alien to him so we are always going to be playing catch up and in constant damage control if remains as influential as he is.
Conte is a multiple title winner and was the last manager to take the title off Pep and Klopp and then went to Serie A and broke Juve's hold there. He deserves more respect.Surely Poch is a better option than Conte
How?Surely Poch is a better option than Conte
Why is there so much talk about interim managers?
This is Manchester United, decide who you want. Go to him, put an offer on the table that is now or never. Pay his club what they want.
Get the manager now, don't write if another season and so much talent.
The club is run by idiots!
Surely Poch is a better option than Conte
You are absolutely right, the Glazers needed to know the risk of someone like Fergie leaving suddenly and should have made moves to change the structure in 2011 or 2012. They are so negligent its beyond shocking.It's definitely not all on SAF, he had bosses. The Glazers and Gill are even bigger issues because they should have asked SAF to implement changes or they should have imposed them because it was in the long term interest of the club.
It will be Pochettino. His contract is up in June and PSG will want Zidane when they fail to win the CL again. It's all pretty obvious.
Didn't he go to protect Oles job for him when he clearly should have been sacked? I mean , it's hard to know what to believe. I loved Fergie back in the day but it seems like everything he has a hand in since his retirement fails.
This is depressing. We literally had one of top 10 managers in the world willing to accept an 18-month contract mere three weeks ago. Now we are going to go through next weeks with virtually the same coaching team before we MAYBE appoint an interim manager before potentially appointing a manager with worse record than him. 'Process only started' really tells you everything you need to know.
All those 3 clubs have a foreign manager.My preference would be a British manager who can help putting the right structure in place and sets out to play modern high pressure football as we see Shitty, the scousers and Chelsea play. Best candidate to meet those requirements is probably Potter.
If the board want poch I think they should just approach him now pay out psg because I bet the day after he comes to United Zidane is the new psg manager. He would want that gig where as he obviously doesn't want the United jobIt will be Pochettino. His contract is up in June and PSG will want Zidane when they fail to win the CL again. It's all pretty obvious.
Based on what?Surely Poch is a better option than Conte
Interestingly enough when looking at the starting line ups it doesn't really paint that picture, especially in the first leg where Kane and Son were missing.Yet another thing to factor in would be the relative squad strength. (ETH seems to get Ajax consistently 'punching above their weight'.)
I had the story then but also there were stories that he advised the board to give Ole more time. His influence in bringing in Moyes can't be wished away, it happened.The stories were that SAF was against giving Ole the permanent job and wanted Poch instead.
I have no idea where your assumptions have come from
Yes, admittedly I did think like that. How about you?
It does look similar. Just as similar when we're trying to sign Maguire, and people kept using Van Dijk as reference to justify the signing. There are similarity, but when you watch them closely how they play, they are different.
Fergie likes him.Watch us go for Poch despite Ten Hag clearly making himself available in the summer. Don’t understand where this high admiration for him is coming from within the board? Is trophies or progressive playing style? I mean his best run at Spurs is associated with playing 3 at the back, so why did they not go for Conte instead, who’s at least a proven winner? Just smacks of incompetency again.
How is Ten Haag making himself available in the summer exactly? I might be missing something.Watch us go for Poch despite Ten Hag clearly making himself available in the summer. Don’t understand where this high admiration for him is coming from within the board? Is trophies or progressive playing style? I mean his best run at Spurs is associated with playing 3 at the back, so why did they not go for Conte instead, who’s at least a proven winner? Just smacks of incompetency again.
How is Ten Haag making himself available in the summer exactly? I might be missing something.
He really isn’t.Surely Poch is a better option than Conte
People just assume he played a part in Ole getting the job but I've seen nothing to suggest that's true. We know Woodward and the Glazers loved Ole and were all on board with making him permanent.The stories were that SAF was against giving Ole the permanent job and wanted Poch instead.
I have no idea where your assumptions have come from
More reason to stay clear of poch.Fergie likes him.
It is because the fans says that this is Man Utd. Surely he is interested. But agree I have seen nothing from Ten Hag that suggest he is interested. And from player performance against City and Watford he should be thinking if these players are just interested in their own ego.How is Ten Haag making himself available in the summer exactly? I might be missing something.
SamePiers Morgan