Ubik
Nothing happens until something moves!
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2010
- Messages
- 19,408
Well I'm gutted that the Tories are going to find it so easy to increase their majority at the next election mainly, but you can believe that I've got green scales and razor teeth if you really want to, along with all my other war-criminal buddies.With spin-skills like that I'm not surprised you're gutted about the Blairites getting annihilated.
The policies you mention aren't socialism. Socialism is generally slightly more ambitious than simply curbing the worst excesses of an unfair economic system, it's about creating an economic system where those excesses don't exist. I'm not saying they were bad policies by any means - as you say, they did a lot of good - but you can't seriously say they were socialist policies. If you brought Disraeli into 2001 he'd recognise New Labour's welfare policy as a slightly sexed up version of classic one nation conservatism, but to some in the Labour Party it's socialism
And I didn't say his NATO thing was inclusive - I simply gave it as an example of how he's not the set-in-stone ideologue straw man the right of the party and the press are trying to paint him as.
If those weren't examples of his inclusive leadership style then I'm still interested in hearing some, given that the original point you made was that he is much better at that sort of thing than Blair. I can't imagine him budging on economic matters, on foreign intervention or on public services, which limits the scope for him to deliver on this somewhat. Would he agree to maintain some sort of nuclear deterrent for instance if enough people in the party thought it best for instance?