Patriotism of the rich is a wonder to behold.
Yeah, I'm sure you'd stick around out of sheer solidarity if you were in the same boat.
Patriotism of the rich is a wonder to behold.
Yeah, I'm sure you'd stick around out of sheer solidarity if you were in the same boat.
The structural defects are in a system that allows anybody to earn so much in the first place, not in any system that seeks to redress this by taxing them.Fair fecks to him I guess. 75% marginal tax is way above what's reasonable. The rich have to carry more of the load yes, but if France needs 75% then there are structural defects in the system that need to be fixed.
I guess someone has to pay for the lazy 10% French unemployed..and retiring at 60
Fair fecks to him I guess. 75% marginal tax is way above what's reasonable. The rich have to carry more of the load yes, but if France needs 75% then there are structural defects in the system that need to be fixed.
What a terrible boat to be on, earning over €1million.
Aye, unemployment is always due to laziness.
Those in that wage bracket could of course just stop working altogether once they reach € 1 million, seeing as it's hardly worth the trouble when you're only working 1/4 of the hour for your own good. I'm sure that will really allow France's economy to pick up, when people decide it's just not worth the hassle to put in an extra shift.
Those in that wage bracket could of course just stop working altogether once they reach € 1 million, seeing as it's hardly worth the trouble when you're only working 1/4 of the hour for your own good. I'm sure that will really allow France's economy to pick up, when people decide it's just not worth the hassle to put in an extra shift.
People are being very literal tonight, it would seem. I'm not suggesting they're actually stood at the assembly line.
What a terrible boat to be on, earning over €1million.
The structural defects are in a system that allows anybody to earn so much in the first place, not in any system that seeks to redress this by taxing them.
Yes, it's called Capitalism, how do you think he got so much in the first placE? It's fecked everywhere.
So no one deserves to earn more?
Most of the rich people I know got their money through very hard work, taking risks very few people would dare to take or just simply being significantly better at something. Silly idea to punish them for that.
You seem to be under the illusion that earnings are related to talent, hard work and social usefulness.People are being very literal tonight, it would seem. I'm not suggesting they're actually stood at the assembly line, but they still work... a lot.
So no one deserves to earn more?
Most of the rich people I know got their money through very hard work, taking risks very few people would dare to take or just simply being significantly better at something. Silly idea to punish them for that.
Let me guess...they did it all on their own too with no govt. help whatsoever.
This needs to head to the CE so we don't have to go over basics again.
Nobody earning £20k a week would intentionally stop earning at that point and start taking Fridays off, that's not how those kind of jobs work.
Of course I have a problem with people earning that much. Ibra gathers the resources required to feed 43000 people, we live on a finite base of resources, as much as we'd all love to have everything we want, you can't as that way there isn't enough to go around.So you have a problem with people earning that much? Why?
As long as they earn their money legitimately and pay proper tax, why should we be concerned about how much they have?
Yeah, I'm sure you'd stick around out of sheer solidarity if you were in the same boat.
Because the system is inherently flawed if someone can earn £250K a week when someone else earns £25K a year. Think about it for a minute... it's just lunacy.As long as they earn their money legitimately and pay proper tax, why should we be concerned about how much they have?
But the people earning that amount may very well decide that they can get paid a lot better, doing the same amount of work, elsewhere. If you had the opportunity to get paid a lot better for the same job, but you had to move to another country, wouldn't you at least consider it?
75% of everything over 1 million euros, it's much fairer than the 45% nonsense we have at the moment. People can't just keep holding those levels of resources, it's not sustainable.
You seem to be under the illusion that earnings are related to talent, hard work and social usefulness.
then don't pay them/give them those resources.
problem solved.
Yeah I would. If I had millions upon millions I would be happy to pay more in taxes so that my countrymen could put food on the table or send their kids to a decent school or get proper healthcare.
Revolutionary I know but some of us still believe in the common good.
Yes because the poor frenchman on unemployment benefit are going hungry, are without healthcare and homeless...
Or not.
Why not cap earnings instead?
Why not cap earnings instead?
Wouldn't that just be a top rate of 100%? I'm all for that.
Because France is completely isolated from the rest of the world...
Or not.
Yeah that's true, technical but important point concededI know where you're coming from but it would raise no revenue as it wouldn't be paid out, so isn't a tax.
Wouldn't that just be a top rate of 100%? I'm all for that.
Because that's a stupid idea. They'll just get other benefits, shares in the company, free cars, houses, homes, usual stuff. It already happens. In fact a company I worked for gave free-cars and rent in Paris, and they were probably earning around 100k a year.
Because we don't have multinational charitable organisations we can give money to if we wanted.. right?