Skills
Snitch
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2012
- Messages
- 42,989
Wow, what a series.
So if OKC gets out in the first round, does Durant still get MVP?
Wow, what a series.
His dismal first round display will get cancelled out by his ridiculous out-of-this-world January, and the rest of the season still holds up to a MVP standard. So yeah, still deserves it.
Dirk won the MVP award in 2007 when the Mavs lost the first round series against the Warriors.Wasn't Dirk all lined up for MVP until the Mavs went out in the first round as the 1 seed in 2007 or whatever?
I can't see the NBA giving the MVP to a player whose team loses in the first round. Has it ever happened before?
Dirk won the MVP award in 2007 when the Mavs lost the first round series against the Warriors.
Read this one tirade against the league this morning because it has taken them a little over 2 days to come to this decision. The person actually argued that two days was too much time, that it should have acted within hours. Now granted in this day and age 2 days gives everyone in the world a chance to hear the story 500 times or more, but the league did have a responsibility to do at least a little investigation into this didn't they?
I think two days is actually a pretty quick turn-around even on something this blatant.
Now it will be up to his fellow owners to step up and force him to sell the Clippers.
It simply was a nightmare match-up for the Mavs. They lost all games during the regular season against the Warriors, started the season with 4 losses and finished it with 15 losses in total, just to face the one opponent, that has all the tools to hurt them. Nowitzki playing one of his worst ever playoff games in game 6 then finished the job. I really felt sorry for Dirk back then, it all sucked so bad after the nightmare final series against the Heat the year before and I feared he will never win a title. Still, he was clearly a deserving MVP for his regular season.
As far as I know, the vote is done before the first playoff round is finished anyway, so it can't be influenced by the playoff performances?
KD fully deserves the MVP award this year. Overall he had the best regular season, and was about 5 points (!) ahead of everybody else in scoring per game. 2nd best record in the NBA as well with the 1st being SA. KD MVP, Pop coach of the year.Yep.
Thing is LeBron, his closest contender himself had a slump after a brilliant February until the play-offs. If LeBron wouldn't have had that slump, then may be he would have had a chance of winning it. But as of now, KD is getting MVP award irrespective of what OKC do.
Brooks should gtfo. That play was crazy. I can't see any other team beating Miami if OKC gets eliminated.
Surely OKC will have to re-assess things if (basically when) they do go out? You just can't have Westbrook being so selfish. I don't have an issue with him taking lots of shots, it's just some of the shot selections are atrocious. Ridiculous 3 point attempts that are just never going to work.
Ah thanks. So it was not set up by a court/the league/...etc. I can see that being a potential slippery slop now, I wish Silver mentioned his previous history as a factor in the decision and not categorically deny it and stress that was wholly based on the leaked recording. That was the only thing I disagreed with in the whole announcement.Her lawyer denies she had anything to do with the recordings, however after listening to a lot of sports radio in the last few days, many pundits and callers think she was indeed the one who recorded and released the audio.
The Bobcats' best player was injured in the series, so they didn't even play full strength against the Heat.True. But the current Bobcats team is quite good. Considering how poor Miami were post all-star weekend, I think it was good to see that they had not gone the Pacers way and were simply pacing themselves for the postseason.
Ah thanks. So it was not set up by a court/the league/...etc. I can see that being a potential slippery slop now, I wish Silver mentioned his previous history as a factor in the decision and not categorically deny it and stress that was wholly based on the leaked recording. That was the only thing I disagreed with in the whole announcement.
Are you referring to playoff ball-or in general? Regarding the playoffs-all of the teams are pretty good (some are very good) and so the difference in quality isn't that great. As a result, you'd expect close games. Moreover, during the playoffs games are spread-out, unlike in the regular season when a team may play on consecutive nights after traveling between two cities.I'm relatively new to watching basketball avidly. I caught it sparingly for a few years and then last year got really into it. I have a question I've always wanted to ask though; why are the games always close? It's just so odd. I see a team get a decent lead but I know it's irrelevant because the other teams will always come back. Like the Brooklyn and Toronto game today. It's like they just switch off and allow it to be close again. I know there are some matches where it isn't close, like when a terrible team plays a good one, but it just seems to happen quite often.
Durant is gonna have a terrific game 6.
Are you referring to playoff ball-or in general? Regarding the playoffs-all of the teams are pretty good (some are very good) and so the difference in quality isn't that great. As a result, you'd expect close games. Moreover, during the playoffs games are spread-out, unlike in the regular season when a team may play on consecutive nights after traveling between two cities.
But-basketball, for whatever reason tends to be a game of runs--so when a team goes up by 20 it's unlikely that the team with the lead is really that much better. At some point the other team makes a run-which generally means that they're reverting back to their average shooting percentage. Also, coaches call time-outs to break up a team's momentum-which sometimes works to stop a team from pulling ahead too much.