NBA 2022-2023

Nope, but then you probably weren't aware that in 2010, halfway through Brady's career that lasted as long as it did only because the game is 10 times softer now, the NFL did a top 100 players of all time and Brown and LT were in the top 3. Brady was 21st. If you do it today then Brady would likely be number 1 but it's just wrong to say they are not comparable to him. They are the most dominant players in the history of the sport.

So your whole argument is based on a poll from 13 years ago informing the hypothetical scenario where Brady didn't play more than half of his career?
 
Nope, but then you probably weren't aware that in 2010, halfway through Brady's career that lasted as long as it did only because the game is 10 times softer now, the NFL did a top 100 players of all time and Brown and LT were in the top 3. Brady was 21st. If you do it today then Brady would likely be number 1 but it's just wrong to say they are not comparable to him. They are the most dominant players in the history of the sport.
Brady wouldn't likely be #1, he'd be a near unanimous #1.

If you think a RB can be in the discussion for greatest NFL player ever than I just don't know what to say to you - we simply disagree, nothing more to say about it.

EDIT: and that's all I say on the subject on here because we're hijacking the NBA thread with NFL talk.
 
Of course he's better at it than they were. He has twice as many SB appearances as the next QB on the list. Do you think that Jim Brown or LT were more than twice as valuable as the next best player at their position, since you seem to be implying that Brady and other QBs should be measured via team success? This might help you get started on that: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/av_career.htm

It's amusing that you are trying to argue that "well for a long time, this is how people thought" as if that's somehow relevant to someone better coming along and blowing them out of the water.
Super Bowl appearances are what teams accomplish, not players. The QB position is more valuable, that is not in debate. But he was not better at doing what he did than they were at what they did. That's why LT was 8 times first team all pro and Brady was 3 times.
 
Controversial not commercial

Meh, The Great Ones records are untouchable, but that's circumstantial on certain things, the sport heavily evolved by even the time Mario showed up... and he proved to be a more dominant player in that changing game. I dunno, maybe I'm being contrary, but I don't think so, Mario is more magical to me, maybe it's career and life story to go with it swaying me, I don't know.... but swap their roles(and health) and Gretzky struggles to replicate Mario more than Mario replicating Gretzky's career.

If you get so hung up on pure numbers with Gretzky, given he played in a shitty ass era for goalies .... players like Crosby, Ovechkin and McDavid don't stand a chance in the strict cap and better goalie depth era. Gretzky peaked in an near 8 goal per game era which dropped to just above 7 for LeMiuex's peak... and then as low as 5.5 for the Crosby/Ovi era.
 
Super Bowl appearances are what teams accomplish, not players. The QB position is more valuable, that is not in debate. But he was not better at doing what he did than they were at what they did. That's why LT was 8 times first team all pro and Brady was 3 times.

You do realize that there are 2-3 spots for a linebacker / edge rusher in an all-pro team versus 1 for a QB, right?
 
Meh, The Great Ones records are untouchable, but that's circumstantial on certain things, the sport heavily evolved by even the time Mario showed up... and he proved to be a more dominant player in that changing game. I dunno, maybe I'm being contrary, but I don't think so, Mario is more magical to me, maybe it's career and life story to go with it swaying me, I don't know.... but swap their roles(and health) and Gretzky struggles to replicate Mario more than Mario replicating Gretzky's career.

If you get so hung up on pure numbers with Gretzky, given he played in a shitty ass era for goalies .... players like Crosby, Ovechkin and McDavid don't stand a chance in the strict cap and better goalie depth era. Gretzky peaked in an near 8 goal per game era which dropped to just above 7 for LeMiuex's peak... and then as low as 5.5 for the Crosby/Ovi era.
I love when people challenge the Gretzky orthodoxy. I've seen people stump for Orr as well.
 
That shows how Brown and LT were viewed then.

No one is arguing against them being great. You cannot cite that poll and Brady's position in it as some sort of gotcha when you are omitting 13 years of Brady's career. If anything, it's fecking ludicrous that he was already ranked 21st all time 9 years in.
 
A technical to all the gentlemen here morphing the NBA into the NFL? One on One against Draymond.
 
Brady wouldn't likely be #1, he'd be a near unanimous #1.

If you think a RB can be in the discussion for greatest NFL player ever than I just don't know what to say to you - we simply disagree, nothing more to say about it.

EDIT: and that's all I say on the subject on here because we're hijacking the NBA thread with NFL talk.
Of course they can FFS. This whole totally QB centric thing is a relatively recent phenomenon. The list I referenced had no QBs in the top 3
 
Of course they can FFS. This whole totally QB centric thing is a relatively recent phenomenon. The list I referenced had no QBs in the top 3

Yes - as teams have become smarter and have embraced analytics and data, the value of the QB has risen as opposed to the RB. Or do you think teams are getting worse at evaluating what does or doesn't lead to success?
 
Yes - as teams have become smarter and have embraced analytics and data, the value of the QB has risen as opposed to the RB. Or do you think teams are getting worse at evaluating what does or doesn't lead to success?
No, the rules have changed so the pass has become more valuable. Do you actually know anything about the history of this sport? That you used to be able to jam and bump receivers? That you could actually hit QBs?
 
ok thanks, back to basketball… two great games incoming: bucks at heat & grizzlies at lakers!
 
No, the rules have changed so the pass has become more valuable. Do you actually know anything about the history of this sport? That you used to be able to jam and bump receivers? That you could actually hit QBs?

Shockingly yes, I do know some things about the history of this sport. You've also missed the biggest pro-passing game shift, that being the targeting rules.

LT is up there with the greatest defensive players of all time. He's also simply not as good as Brady, unless you for some bizarre reason prefer to focus on individual accolades bestowed by AP writers than actual team success on the field.
 
LT is up there with the greatest defensive players of all time. He's also simply not as good as Brady, unless you for some bizarre reason prefer to focus on individual accolades bestowed by AP writers than actual team success on the field.

Why would this be bizarre if you are talking about a GOAT - essentially a non-existent, individual accolade?

Also, LT isn't up there. The gap between him and next for defensive player is legitimately huge.
 
Why would this be bizarre if you are talking about a GOAT - essentially a non-existent, individual accolade?

Also, LT isn't up there. The gap between him and next for defensive player is legitimately huge.

Because citing AP all pro selections when it's voted on by the media is entirely subjective and largely narrative-driven?

I also just simply don't really think the gap from LT to Reggie White is bigger than the gap from Brady to Montana.
 
Because citing AP all pro selections when it's voted on by the media is entirely subjective and largely narrative-driven?

I also just simply don't really think the gap from LT to Reggie White is bigger than the gap from Brady to Montana.
So let's just compare players in different positions in different eras solely by rings in a 50+ man sport then. In which case Terry Bradshaw is twice as good as LT. Yes, that makes much more sense
 
So let's just compare players in different positions in different eras by rings in a 50+ man sport then. In which case Terry Bradshaw is twice as good as LT. Yes, that makes much more sense

Don't really want to derail this thread further so feel free to DM me if you want to continue trying to earnestly argue that LT is closer to Brady than Lebron is to MJ
 
Don't really want to derail this thread further so feel free to DM me if you want to continue trying to earnestly argue that LT is closer to Brady than Lebron is to MJ
Don't see any need for DMs but there is an NFL thread so I agree that it ends here in the NBA thread.
 
What deal with the devil did the Warriors make to get all this luck?
I will be surprised if Fox doesn't at least try to give it a go for game 5. He made the 3 pointer at the end of game 4 after he picked up the injury so it's feasible that he could at least try to play.

As to luck, let's ask Klay Thompson and Kevin Durant how lucky they felt in 2019. It's swings and roundabouts. Sometimes you get the breaks, sometimes you don't.
 
Last edited:
I will be surprised if Fox doesn't at least try to give it a go for game 5. He made the 3 pointer at the end of game 4 after he picked up the injury so it's feasible that he could at least try to play.

As to luck, let's ask Klay Thompson and Kevin Durant how lucky they felt in 2019. It's swings and roundabouts. Sometimes you get the breaks, sometimes you don't.

Fox is guaranteed to play game 5.

2019 is the most unluckiest finals for any team in recent history.
 
This Heats Bucks game was wild. The playoffs are a different beast.

Butler has been a top-5 player in the playoffs in recent years.
 
Crazy game from Jimmy. The Bucks on thin ice now.

Buckets went off! Spo is a better coach and schemer than Bud, so if Heat get this Jimmy, no way Bucks win a game or series.

Middleton hasn't been good enough, but their bench is getting exposed. Also, Miami had dominated and outscored Bucks in 4th quarter scoring, +47. Only negative 4th quarter was game 1 by 1 point. Games 2 to 4, 4th quarter has seen Miami blast Milwaukee.
 
What a ridiculous call by the refs in the laker game. AD down injured. Dead ball. Red puts it right back in play and when the lakers foul so he can get medical help they call it a take foul.
 
I will be surprised if Fox doesn't at least try to give it a go for game 5. He made the 3 pointer at the end of game 4 after he picked up the injury so it's feasible that he could at least try to play.

As to luck, let's ask Klay Thompson and Kevin Durant how lucky they felt in 2019. It's swings and roundabouts. Sometimes you get the breaks, sometimes you don't.

But the Warriors have had far more good luck than bad.

1. Steph's ankle injuries, which he got over, leading to him being underpaid.
2. The 2016 cap Spike coinciding with Durant's free agency.
3. 2015 - Love and Irving injuries.
4. 2017 - Zaza injures Kawhi.
5. 2018 - Chris Paul gets injured.
6. 2021 - Ja gets injured.

And now Fox. I probably missed some other things too.

EDIT: Getting KD to agree to a sign-and-trade and subsequently turn D'lo into Wiggins. That's an underrated example of good fortune.
 
Bucks should sack Bud. Vogel or Nurse would be a good upgrade.
 
But the Warriors have had far more good luck than bad.

1. Steph's ankle injuries, which he got over, leading to him being underpaid.
2. The 2016 cap Spike coinciding with Durant's free agency.
3. 2015 - Love and Irving injuries.
4. 2017 - Zaza injures Kawhi.
5. 2018 - Chris Paul gets injured.
6. 2021 - Ja gets injured.

And now Fox. I probably missed some other things too.

EDIT: Getting KD to agree to a sign-and-trade and subsequently turn D'lo into Wiggins. That's an underrated example of good fortune.
Some of the things you list are just part of being a well run organization. As @SinNombre points out though 2019 was about as bad a run of luck as a team has had in recent years. It almost certainly cost the Dubs a Championship. Also the injuries to Irving and Love in 2015 were pretty much offset by Steph carrying an injury in 2016. Although unlike Irving and Love, Steph was able to play, by the end of the series he was a shadow of his normal self and it almost certainly cost the Dubs that Championship as well. That's even without considering Draymond's stupidity and the league deciding to suspend him.

As I said at the time though, the Raptors deserved their Championship. You can only beat what's in front of you. Same with Cavs in 2016 and the Dubs in 2015. Swings and roundabouts. Sometimes things go your way, sometimes they don’t.
 
Memphis graduated from the Draymond Green "School of hitting people in the nuts"