Chip
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2010
- Messages
- 2,948
They don't really need it tonightCleveland "supermarket" Cavaliers. No defense whatsoever.
They don't really need it tonightCleveland "supermarket" Cavaliers. No defense whatsoever.
Funny how even the Denver crowd wanted him to get that last assist and his teammates bottle it several times.Westbrook just beat the record!
I rest my case... (I don't have a horse in the race either by the way)With no horse in this race between any MVP candidate, I appreciate both sides of the argument, and for once I think no choice is wrong. Storyline-wise, it's been one of the best regular seasons I can recall.
Say again?They don't really need it tonight
It was a legit bottle job by the Cavs. But I'm sure they would've won in OT if LeBron hadn't wrongly been fouled out.Say again?
Flagrant 1 is unnecessary contact (don't have to be excessive). Westbrook was pushed while he was in the air with no attempt to play the ball whatsoever. That's a flagrant 1. The refs also reviewed the call and had a good look at it before making the decision.Props to Flexbrook but ref's won them the game with that absurd flagrant.
Honestly if anyone says Westbrook doesn't deserve MVP they would be lying.
Haven't really followed the NBA at all this season. So could someone please explain how Harden is even in the same conversation as Russ for MVP? Besides the Rockets being a better team, I just don't get it. As ESPN never forgets to point out, Westbrook is averaging a triple-double ffs.no they wouldnt
Haven't really followed the NBA at all this season. So could someone please explain how Harden is even in the same conversation as Russ for MVP? Besides the Rockets being a better team, I just don't get it. As ESPN never forgets to point out, Westbrook is averaging a triple-double ffs.
Harden is much more efficient and leads a more efficient offense (even more efficient than last year's Warriors ffs!). He's led a worse supporting cast to a better record.
Yeah, nah. Gordon and Williams are the leading 6th man of the year candidates. Rockets have more talent around Harden than Thunder has around Westbrook. I don't think it is a huge difference but they are better IMO. The real difference is that Houston has a roster made for Harden so they function a lot better than an OKC roster that is built for Durant and Westbrook.
Harden definitely more efficient though. And wins do matter. I want Russ to get it and think he deserves it, but I can see the argument for Harden and he also is just as deserving.
Eric Gordon is 25th in TS% among SG, tied with Alex Abrines. Lou Williams has been good offensively this year but he's never played any defense. Houston's second best player has probably been Clint Capella. Would anyone have taken Capella over Steven Adams a year ago? Or Eric Gordon over Victor Oladipo?
If they gave the award at the end of the regular season, Westbrook would probably have a big chance of winning it. Harden was in the lead for most of the season but in the last 2-3 weeks combined with his wrist injury and Russ still showing up with top numbers has made him a favourite. Also, Rockets have a good chance of going to the NBA finals this season while OKC and Russ aren't gonna get anything in the playoffs so they don't have much of a reason to slow down while Rockets have to manage the roster carefully. Won't mind Harden still winning it but at this point Russ has overtaken him as far as this season's performances are concerned.
However, they are going to do the awards the week after the draft this time, and in all probability Rockets would be dispatching Thunder in the playoffs and that could (unfairly) influence the votes especially if Rockets go deep into the playoffs.
Yeah normally they were as the awards were announced during the playoffs but they've changed the scene this time out so not sure if that's still the case.I think votes are tallied before playoffs begin.
So based on the TS% you believe Gordon and Abrines are at a similar level?
They wouldn't have a year ago but that was when Adams looked like he was going to take a big step. He's still improved but it hasn't been a huge leap and Capella has definitely been just as good if not better. They probably would have taken Oladipo, yes. Like I said, I don't think the gap is that large...but IMO there is a marginal one. The main reason is that D'Antoni is a better coach and the roster is more suited to Harden. Westbrook also having significant stints without Kanter and Oladipo has hurt the team's record.
EDIT: The Thunder's back-up PG is Semaj Christon. Rocket's have Williams. The difference right there is too much for the rest of the supporting cast to make up.
No, that's not what I said at all.
Flagrant 1 is unnecessary contact (don't have to be excessive). Westbrook was pushed while he was in the air with no attempt to play the ball whatsoever. That's a flagrant 1. The refs also reviewed the call and had a good look at it before making the decision.
Well what were you using that stat to illustrate?
That he isn't something to crow about. TS% is good for a rough idea of a player's offensive value but it's rough. There's a lot more to it.
I agree, I'm just saying if Westbrook win it wouldn't be a surprise and it would be also deserved.Harden should win MVP imo
lol at Cavs haha
For anybody who doesn't think Russ is the MVP, the cricket thread is that wayHonestly if anyone says Westbrook doesn't deserve MVP they would be lying.
Harden's case is very strong too, you can't say he doesn't deserve it either, his team is 3rd in NBA, not 6th in the west.For anybody who doesn't think Russ is the MVP, the cricket thread is that way