Bryan_Munich
Aka RichieRich12
You and a few others seem to have forgotten our club announced we had signed Aaron Ramsey.
Exception rather than the rule.
You and a few others seem to have forgotten our club announced we had signed Aaron Ramsey.
Sounds like a plan.
Get Nasri to sign a pre-contract agreement to come to us next year on a free, and then we can really have a good laugh at Arse. It would serve them right tbh...
the earliest he can do that though is at christmas...Sounds like a plan.
Get Nasri to sign a pre-contract agreement to come to us next year on a free, and then we can really have a good laugh at Arse. It would serve them right tbh...
Sounds like a plan.
Get Nasri to sign a pre-contract agreement to come to us next year on a free, and then we can really have a good laugh at Arse. It would serve them right tbh...
protracted saga may affect the relationship of the two concerned clubs.
That's what I would have always thought, that ultimately the player holds all the cards but our steadfast refusal to allow Heinze join Liverpool does seem to indicate that the club the player is contracted to still has a major say in their next destination.
"That's where I play best, that's how I was formed. In every age group at every level, I often played through the middle. I've been playing out wide for two years with Arsenal but feel more at ease in the centre of the pitch."
Arsenal would be stupid to do that. They should be taking the £20m now so they can get a replacement in and get him into pre-season training.
the earliest he can do that though is at christmas...
this also gives you an indication of his main motivator - money
city will offer over 200k a week, chelsea, barca and madrid probably 150k a week so it will be even harder to compete
Exception rather than the rule.
As far as I know this issue haven't been tested in EU court.
Let's say a legally correct contracted player hypothetically refuse to play for his current club in order to change to a new club. No matter circumstances, going by today's rules, UEFA/FA would refuse him to get a new registration.
That means that the player had to see his contract out, if his club is not willing to sell or terminate his contract.
But what happened if the player take this to court and point to EU laws? Then UEFA would have a serious problem.
For example. Let's say Cesc Fabregas immediately want to move back to his home because his father has a life threatening sickness and he want to live closer to his father. The question is can Arsenal and the UEFA refuse him to play (and earn money) for his local team/Barcelona, even if he has time left on his current contract? Isn't he free under our current EU laws to work where he want's, if it's inside EU?
Today the club holds all the cards. Off course it's economical madness to hold on to a player who don't want to play for you but with new wealthy owners this unwritten rules became irrelevant if these rich clubs want to make a stance.
I'm not 100% sure if I'm right regarding this but please feel free to help me if you know more what's correct in this matter.
As far as I know this issue haven't been tested in EU court.
Let's say a legally correct contracted player hypothetically refuse to play for his current club in order to change to a new club. No matter circumstances, going by today's rules, UEFA/FA would refuse him to get a new registration.
That means that the player had to see his contract out, if his club is not willing to sell or terminate his contract.
But what happened if the player take this to court and point to EU laws? Then UEFA would have a serious problem.
For example. Let's say Cesc Fabregas immediately want to move back to his home because his father has a life threatening sickness and he want to live closer to his father. The question is can Arsenal and the UEFA refuse him to play (and earn money) for his local team/Barcelona, even if he has time left on his current contract? Isn't he free under our current EU laws to work where he want's, if it's inside EU?
Today the club holds all the cards. Off course it's economical madness to hold on to a player who don't want to play for you but with new wealthy owners this unwritten rules became irrelevant if these rich clubs want to make a stance.
I'm not 100% sure if I'm right regarding this but please feel free to help me if you know more what's correct in this matter.
Top football agent Phil Smith has claimed Samir Nasri will definitely leave Arsenal this summer – and has his pick of Manchester clubs.
The Frenchman has been linked with both City and United recently with the Red Devils offering £20million for the midfielder.
Smith though told the Alan Brazil Sports Breakfast show that the Citizens’ wealth might play a factor in any deal.
He said: “I think Arsenal would sell him to anyone but Manchester United. The money may talk with Manchester City lurking and offering £150,000 per week.
“I think he’ll go but it could easily be either of them [Man United or Man City].
“Arsenal have to make a decision, £20million now or nothing at the end of the year.”
Radio: Smith: Nasri will definitely leave this summer and has pick of Manchester clubs | Radio talkSPORT
Earlier this week, Nasri said: "Money has never been my motivation.
"The priority is to make a big career and to win titles.
Top football agent Phil Smith has claimed Samir Nasri will definitely leave Arsenal this summer – and has his pick of Manchester clubs.
The Frenchman has been linked with both City and United recently with the Red Devils offering £20million for the midfielder.
Smith though told the Alan Brazil Sports Breakfast show that the Citizens’ wealth might play a factor in any deal.
He said: “I think Arsenal would sell him to anyone but Manchester United. The money may talk with Manchester City lurking and offering £150,000 per week.
“I think he’ll go but it could easily be either of them [Man United or Man City].
“Arsenal have to make a decision, £20million now or nothing at the end of the year.”
Radio: Smith: Nasri will definitely leave this summer and has pick of Manchester clubs | Radio talkSPORT
What is he going to do with the money when he's not winning trophies?
We'll he how honest his talking is/was.
I think the thread title is slightly misleading amidst all the continued speculation.
Not having a pop, but its mental how mad a sentence can sound with just two letters missing..
According to a report in the Daily Mail this morning, Arsene Wenger has given Samir Nasri his blessing to move on from The Emirates.
One condition that the French manager has stipulated however, is that Nasri waits until a replacement is found.
Top football agent Phil Smith has claimed Samir Nasri will definitely leave Arsenal this summer – and has his pick of Manchester clubs.
The Frenchman has been linked with both City and United recently with the Red Devils offering £20million for the midfielder.
Smith though told the Alan Brazil Sports Breakfast show that the Citizens’ wealth might play a factor in any deal.
He said: “I think Arsenal would sell him to anyone but Manchester United. The money may talk with Manchester City lurking and offering £150,000 per week.
“I think he’ll go but it could easily be either of them [Man United or Man City].
“Arsenal have to make a decision, £20million now or nothing at the end of the year.”
Radio: Smith: Nasri will definitely leave this summer and has pick of Manchester clubs | Radio talkSPORT
I like to blame the cat for tripping all over the laptop. And you are right, that sentence should burn in hell.
Hopefully people get the "idea" of that slur.
According to a report in the Daily Mail this morning, Arsene Wenger has unleashed a curse on Manchester United after they tried to poach Samir Nasri.
A condition of the curse being lifted is that the Old Trafford outfit provide Wenger with his own water slide, and a trampoline.
Not the first time you've had pussy on your laptop eh?
Ah yeah, Nasri will look like a plank if he ends up at City after his "titles - more than money" speech, but as one poster mentioned a few pages back - nothing would surprise about the modern footballer, many (or most) of them are money-hungry souless twats that couldnt give a feck about winning Cups aslong as the bank balance is bustin out...
Top football agent Phil Smith has claimed Samir Nasri will definitely leave Arsenal this summer – and has his pick of Manchester clubs.
The Frenchman has been linked with both City and United recently with the Red Devils offering £20million for the midfielder.
Smith though told the Alan Brazil Sports Breakfast show that the Citizens’ wealth might play a factor in any deal.
He said: “I think Arsenal would sell him to anyone but Manchester United. The money may talk with Manchester City lurking and offering £150,000 per week.
“I think he’ll go but it could easily be either of them [Man United or Man City].
“Arsenal have to make a decision, £20million now or nothing at the end of the year.”
Radio: Smith: Nasri will definitely leave this summer and has pick of Manchester clubs | Radio talkSPORT
Not the first time you've had pussy on your laptop eh?
Ah yeah, Nasri will look like a plank if he ends up at City after his "titles - more than money" speech, but as one poster mentioned a few pages back - nothing would surprise about the modern footballer, many (or most) of them are money-hungry souless twats that couldnt give a feck about winning Cups aslong as the bank balance is bustin out...